Saturday, March 31, 2007

Whitley Streiber Says 'They're Coming !'

It is possible that the visitors are about to show up. I am not saying that this will happen, but only that this is a time when it could happen, and there are some indications that it may be about to happen.
The indications are these: First, the large number of UFO sightings around the world, capped most recently by a report that there is an active UFO on the ground in southern Somalia. Is this report true? So far, it has not been possible to follow up, and probably the only way to get confirmation would be from a US military satellite, and we can forget that. Second, the sudden upsurge in official and semi-official statements, with the latest being Gov. Fife Symington's reiteration on Good Morning America this morning that he had seen a UFO.

So, all of the activity and public pronouncement suggest change. Interestingly, conditions within our society suggest that a basis of rational response to contact that has not been present in the past is present now. For example, this website now reaches a million people every month with its sophisticated and sensible view of the UFO and close encounter phenomena. Even five years ago, nothing like it existed. Public reaction to UFOs is now muted. The appearance of even extensive UFO activity in a given area does not cause panic or sensational press response. They are more-or-less taken for granted as a relatively benign mystery of interest to some but not most people.

This is a profile that is conducive to a more productive form of contact than has been possible in the past. It will not be the way the world at first presents itself to the visitors, but it is there, and behind it there lies the potential for a rational response.

At first, the media will likely go to all the wrong authorities: to scientists who know nothing of the history of the phenomenon and will look upon whatever is happening now as the beginning of a process of contact and not what it is, which is the culmination of many years of effort; to religious leaders who will contend that their own beliefs must be reflected in the culture of the visitors, and, if not, that they are somehow fallen, or 'not saved' or otherwise ignorant; to government officials who might make false claims about what has happened in the past; and to various UFO researchers, probably the ones with the most sensationalistic theories, or who assert their leadership most forcefully, and are therefore ego-driven and least capable.

Later, though, cooler heads will hopefully prevail, and we will begin to explore how contact can help us. Initially, this will be a matter of looking back over the past 60 years at a higher level of scientific analysis, and seeing what it has already left behind that can be of use to us. Then learning to communicate with the visitors, which will involve using our minds in a new way, and accepting that such things as what we call 'telepathy' are merely aspects of nature and perfectly detectable and measurable.

It will take human culture many years to evolve an efficient organ of communication and exchange with them, and they will not be in a hurry. There will turn out to be people, as it were, hidden away in our socieities all over the world who have already been prepared and will together provide a useful beginning.

This will unfold outside of the context of current religious and governmental structures. The planet is dying, which is why the visitors are showing up now, to try to offer us a new perspective. They will not lay out a plan of action. But observing their presence, the knowledge they have left behind already, and whatever messages we can glean from early attempts at communication, will provide us with a rich new source of ideas.

Depending on how serious our situation actually is, they may intervene in the cultural milieu in some very surprising ways, by taking specific action to deflect or curtail the activities of those most unwilling to try to live in a way that will sustain the planet's functioning long term. If that happens, then we will see interventions that will cause a good deal of consternation, although I cannot even begin to guess the exact form they may take.

They will not at first address the species' various religious ideas except in very general terms, by communicating with us in triads, with a positive thrust and a negative thrust, leaving us to evolve the message by reconciling its two parts. I know that this is very, very different from the way we commuicate, but it works and if they do show up it will become familiar enough.

Face-to-face communication, if the experience of close encounter witnesses so far is any example, will be extremely varied. Not only will there be many different physical forms involved, they will be presenting us with sometimes radically different views of the way they should approach us.

Imagine what it would be like on another planet if human spacefarers showed up, some from the US, others from Brazil, others from Borneo, from France, from India and China, and you can get a very minor idea of what this will be like.

What we are apt to see are many different variants of known forms as well as some we have never seen, or hardly seen, and some of these will be quite frightening, with a combination of toughness and capabilities that will make it very hard to face them. But not impossible.

I did it alone in the woods in the middle of the night, so it certainly can be done.

There are also going to be more human forms. It turns out that physical evolution follows similar patterns on worlds with similar mineral content and similar stars. There is something about the stars themselves that determines what sort of creature will evolve on their planets, and so the mix of forms is tremendous, but also strangely familiar, and, in some cases, shockingly so.

People ask me what I will do under the circumstances of contact. I already know my role, very precisely. I will not volunteer myself, but I do have a lot of knowledge that will be freely available to anybody who asks. I am not ego-driven, in the sense that I will want to take some place that I might think I deserve.

In this, we are all equal. Nobody knows much more than another and nobody deserves any special place in regard to the contact process. Those who seek to impose their presence between the visitors and the rest of us will find that they have made a grave mistake, in that they will be among the first human beings called to task for violating laws created elsewhere, that now also pertain to us.

What I will be eager to do is to help evolve effective human institutions of contact. These will be scientific and cultural. In my work on this subject in fiction and in the movies, I am already struggling with the cultural aspect. I am not trying to use fiction to disguise what I believe to be factually true, but to offer stories that are emotionally true, and give a taste of the wonder, fear and sense of question the actual experience involves.

Once contact comes, my primary work will change. It will be to offer persepective and guidance in the development of a useful scientific response to this new model of the universe, as an entity that contains a certain amount of intelligent life beyond our own, and knowledge associated with it that we can integrate into our own understanding.

This is what I have been unable to do so far, because official denial has led to a broader culture of denial within educated human circles. Right now, it is as dangerous to a scientist's career to propose that money be spent on the study of UFOs as it was in the fifteenth century for him to propose that the earth revolves around the sun.

But the earth does revolve around the sun, and when we faced that reality, we embarked upon a five hundred year journey into science that has culminated in all the magnificent knowledge we possess today.

Similarly, when science acknowledges that the visitors are real and therefore that communication with them and use of the knowledge we get from that is possible, a second, and even greater scientific revolution will unfold.

At the end of the first scientific revolution, we are sending instantaneous messages around the world, feeding billions more than we ever dreamed possible, flying, and doing so much more. It has been a triumph.

The next scientific revolution begins when the scientific community acknowledges that other intelligence is here and that it has unknown origins. When we look back from the perspective of another five hundred years, we will find that this second scientific revolution has been even more profound, and the triumph great beyond the most hopeful imaginings of today.

from www.unknowncountry.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Friday, March 30, 2007

Fastwalkers

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Oxygen Healing Therapies

Medical Miracle?
Ozone and Hydrogen Peroxide in Healing

By Nathaniel Altman
Author of Oxygen Healing Therapies

Although used by an estimated ten million patients in Europe since the early 1960's, the therapeutic use of medical ozone and hydrogen peroxide (technically known as "bio-oxidative therapies") is largely a mystery to North Americans. Hailed as a safe, eff ective and low-cost treatment for a wide spectrum of diseases- including candida, cancer, heart problems and HIV-related infections- in Europe, proponents feel that they can go far in resolving America's health care crisis. However, physicians who have tr ied to utilize these therapies in this country are often harassed by local medical societies and threatened with loss of license. As a result, every year hundreds of patients have been forced to seek out physicians in Germany, Russia and even Cuba where t hese therapies are an accepted part of the medical mainstream.. Others spend tens of thousands of dollars to receive bogus ozone cures from unlicensed practitioners here and abroad who ignore established protocols. Many end their lives in both poverty and despair.

What is the truth behind bio-oxidative therapies? Are they a panacea to our health-care crisis, or are ozone and hydrogen peroxide ineffective and even dangerous to health? And despite decades of clinical success, why are they considered "experimental" an d not approved by the FDA? On the following pages, let's examine some of the major questions about bio-oxidative therapies and their role in human health care picture.

Q: Exactly what are bio-oxidative therapies?
A: Bio-oxidative therapies involve administering small amounts of diluted ozone and hydrogen peroxide into the body for the prevention and treatment of disease. Ozone therapy has been used by licensed physicians in Germany since the early 1960's, while hy drogen peroxide therapy was developed in the United States primarily by Dr. C.H. Farr, nominee for the 1993 Nobel prize in Medicine.

Q: What is the scientific basis for bio-oxidative therapies?
A: The philosophy behind bio-oxidative therapies is a simple one. The use of hydrogen peroxide and ozone in medicine is based on the belief that the accumulation of toxins in the body is normally burnt up by the process of oxidation, a process wherein a s ubstance is changed chemically because of the effect of oxygen on it. Oxidation breaks the toxins down into carbon dioxide and water, and eliminates them from the body. However, if the oxygen system of the body is weak or deficient (whether through lack o f exercise, environmental pollution, poor diet, smoking, or improper breathing), our bodies cannot eliminate them adequately and a toxic reaction can occur. In minor cases, a toxic buildup can lead to fatigue, while a wide range of diseases can result whe n poor oxygenation is chronic.

Q: Are these considered "new" therapies?
A: Although few of us have ever heard of them, bio-oxidative therapies have been around for a long time. They have been used clinically by European physicians for over a century, and were first reported by Dr. T.H. Oliver in the British medical publicatio n The Lancet in 1920.1 Since that time, they have been studied in major medical research centers throughout the world, including Baylor University, Yale University, The University of California (Los Angeles) and Harvard University in the United States, as well as in medical schools and laboratories in Great Britain, Germany, Italy, Russia, Canada, Japan and Cuba. Today, between fifty and one hundred scientific articles are published each month about the chemical and biological effects of ozone and hydroge n peroxide.

Q: How do they work?
A: Bio-oxidative therapies are used to provide the body with active forms of oxygen orally, intravenously or through the skin. Once in the body, the hydrogen peroxide or ozone breaks down into various oxygen subspecies which contact anaerobic viruses and microbes [i.e. viruses and microbes which have the ability to live without air], as well as diseased or deficient tissue cells. It oxidizes these cells while leaving the healthy cells alone. When the body becomes saturated with these special forms of oxyg en, it reaches a state of purity wherein disease microorganisms are killed, while the underlying toxicity is oxidized and eliminated.

According to Frank Shallenberger, M.D., who is best known in the United States for treating AIDS patients with a holistic protocol including ozone, bio-oxidative therapies have affect the human body in the following ways:

They stimulate the production of white blood cells, which are necessary to fight infection.

Ozone and hydrogen peroxide are anti-virucidal.

They increase oxygen and hemoglobin disassociation, thus increasing the delivery of oxygen from the blood to the cells.

Ozone and hydrogen peroxide are anti-neoplastic, which means that they inhibit the growth of new tissues like tumors.

They oxidize and degrade petrochemicals.

They increase red blood cell membrane distensibility, thus enhancing their flexibility and effectiveness.

Bio-oxidative therapies increase the production of interferon and Tumor Necrosis Factor, which the body uses to fight infections and cancers.

They increase the efficiency of the anti-oxidant enzyme system, which scavenges excess free radicals in the body.

They accelerate the Citric Acid Cycle, which is the main cycle for the liberation of energy from sugars. This then stimulates basic metabolism. It also breaks down proteins, carbohydrates and fats to be used as energy.

Bio-oxidative therapies increase tissue oxygenation, thus bringing about patient improvement.2
Q: What exactly is hydrogen peroxide and how is it used therapeutically?
A: Hydrogen peroxide (H202) is made up of two hydrogen atoms and two oxygen atoms. A powerful oxidizer, hydrogen peroxide kills bacteria, viruses and fungi; most of us have used a 3% solution of hydrogen peroxide externally to disinfect wounds. Higher co ncentrations of hydrogen peroxide are used extensively in the agricultural, food and chemical industries as a disinfectant, water purifier and bleaching agent. It is also a common ingredient in contact lens cleaners, eye drops and mouthwashes.

Hydrogen peroxide is involved in all of life's vital processes, and must be present for the immune system to function properly. The cells in the body that fight infection (known as granulocytes) produce hydrogen peroxide as a first line of defense against invading organisms like parasites, viruses, bacteria and yeast. It is also required for the metabolism of protein, carbo-hydrates, fats, vitamins and minerals. As a hormonal regulator, hydrogen peroxide is necessary for the body's production of estrogen, progesterone and thyroxin; it also helps regulate blood sugar and the production of energy in cells. Hydrogen peroxide has long been used medically as a disinfectant, antiseptic and oxidizer, but has only recently been found to successfully treat a wide variety of human diseases with a minimum of harmful side effects.

The most common form of hydrogen peroxide therapy used by doctors calls for small amounts of 30% reagent grade hydrogen peroxide added to purified water and administered as an intravenous drip. However, some individuals like to add a cup of 35% food grade hydrogen peroxide to a bathtub of warm water; the hydrogen peroxide is absorbed into the body through the skin while the person soaks in the tub. Others drink a glass of water to which several drops of food or reagent grade hydrogen peroxide have been ad ded. Although there have been reports of improved health with this method, physicians like Dr. Farr believe that taking hydrogen peroxide orally can have a corrosive effect on the stomach and small intestine and advise against using it. 3

Q: What about ozone? How is it used medically?
A: Ozone (O3) is an energized form of oxygen with extra electrons. It forms the protective ozone layer around the planet, yet becomes a pollutant when mixed with hydrocarbons (like carbon dioxide) and nitrogen oxide from automobile and factory emissions. Because scientists have focussed on the negative effects of inhaled ozone, the medicinal aspects of the gas when applied intravenously or through the skin have been largely overlooked.

Because ozone was found to be an effective bactericide and fungicide during the mid-1800's, it was first used to purify drinking water in a number of European cities. Today, over 2000 municipalities around the world- including Montreal, Paris, Los Angeles and Moscow- purify their drinking water with ozone. However, ozone was not used medically until 1915, when it was found to be an effective disinfectant of wounds and skin diseases in Germany during the First World War. It was later found that ozone has t he ability to "blast" holes through the membranes of viruses, yeasts, bacteria and abnormal tissue cells and therefore killing them. Ozone was the focus of considerable research in Germany during the 1930's where it was successfully used to treat patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disorders, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and chronic bacterial diarrhea. The four primary ways to administer medical ozone include:

Autohemotherapy, which involves removing about one half pint of blood from the patient, adding ozone and oxygen to the blood, and infusing the blood back to the patient.
Rectal insufflation, in which ozone and oxygen is administered as a rectal enema. The ozone/oxygen mixture is then absorbed through the large intestine.
Ozone "bagging", which involves having an airtight bag placed around the area to be treated. A mixture of ozone and oxygen is pumped into the bag and absorbed through the skin.
Ozone is also used externally in the form of ozonated olive or sunflower oil.
Q; What types of diseases can be treated with ozone and hydrogen peroxide?
A: Bio-oxidative therapies offer a tremendous range of medical application. According to the International Bio-Oxidative Medical Foundation (IBOMF), an Oklahoma-based organization devoted to research and education about these therapies, the following cond itions or diseases have been treated with ozone and hydrogen peroxide with varying degrees of success:

Heart and Blood Vessel Diseases

Peripheral vascular disease (poor circulation)
Cerebral vascular disease (stroke and memory loss)
Cardiovascular disease (heart disease)
Coronary spasm (angina)
Cardioconversion (heart stopped)
Cardiac arrhythmias (irregular heartbeat)
Gangrene (of fingers and toes)
Raynaud's disease ("white finger")
Temporal arteritis (inflammation of the temporal artery)
Vascular and cluster headaches
Pulmonary Diseases

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Emphysema
Asthma
Bronchiectasis (dilatation of bronchus or bronchi)
Pneumocystis carinii (PCP or AIDS-related pneumonia)
Chronic bronchitis
Infectious Diseases

Influenza
Herpes zoster (shingles)
Herpes simplex (fever blister)
Systemic chronic candidiasis (candida)
Epstein-Barr virus (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome)
HIV-related infections
Acute and chronic viral infections
Chronic unresponsive bacterial infections
Parasitic infections
Immune Disorders

Multiple sclerosis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Diabetes mellitus Type II
Hypersensitive reactions (environmental and universal reactors)
Other Diseases

Parkinson's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Migraine headaches
Chronic pain syndromes (due to multiple causes)
Pain of metastatic carcinoma
Cancers of the blood and lymph nodes 4
Q: Is it true that ozone cures AIDS?
A: There is growing evidence that ozone (as well as hydrogen peroxide, since ozone becomes transformed into hydrogen peroxide in the body) can destroy lipid-enveloped viruses both outside and within the body, including those related to hepatitis, Epstein -Barr, cancer, herpes, cytomegalovirus and HIV. The results of a study coordinated by the Canadian Armed Forces and published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal showed that ozone kills HIV, the hepatitis and herpes viruses, and other harmful agen ts in the blood used for transfusion. The author of the article added, "The systemic use of ozone in the treatment of AIDS could not only reduce the virus load, but also possibly revitalize the immune system." 5 Although a related study on AIDS patients p roved inconclusive, Cmdr. Michael Shannon, MD, one of the coordinators of the study, wrote that "Of interest, however, the three patients (out of ten volunteers) who responded to minor autohemotherapy in the first trial, are still alive after four years p ost treatment, with CD4 counts in excess of two hundred. These patients should have theoretically succumbed to AIDS within a year post-treatment."6 In several clinics in Germany, AIDS patients are being treated successfully with different types of ozone t herapies, including rectal insufflation, ozone bagging, and autohemotherapy.

Bio-oxidative therapies can be an important part of holistic treatment for HIV-related problems, including lower T-cell counts, opportunistic infections, and AIDS-related diarrhea. Dan's was one such case. He was diagnosed HIV-positive and his T-cell coun t had dropped below 600. After only one month of ozone therapy as part of a protocol including vitamin supplements, anti-viral compounds and intestinal cleansing, his T-cell count rose to 900 and his swollen lymph nodes shrank for the first time in years.

Although there have been other cases of improvement of AIDS patients after regular ozone treatments (and several documented cases of people who were HIV+ reverting to HIV- status) ozone and hydrogen peroxide should not be considered as a "magic bullet" ag ainst HIV and AIDS. According to Frank Shallenberger, M.D. "Ozone therapy works in AIDS by acting as a an immune system modulator. In this capacity, it is very effective, safe, inexpensive and readily available. Proper therapy for AIDS will be directed at early intervention (i.e. CD4 count > 300), ozone plus other synergistic immune-augmented therapy, intestinal cleansing is paramount due to the immuno-suppressive aspect of parasites.7

Dr. Silvia Menendez, the co-founder of Cuba's Department of Ozone Department (part of the prestigious National Center for Scientific Research in Havana), suggested that ozone works best when administered as soon as possible after HIV infection, before the virus has penetrated the lymphatic system and bone marrow. The personal, economic and social ramifications of this possibility cannot be underestimated.

Q: Are these therapies safe?
A: Although ozone and hydrogen peroxide are highly toxic in their purified state, they have been found to be both safe and effective when diluted to therapeutic levels for medical use. When administered in prescribed amounts by a qualified practitioner, t he chances of experiencing adverse reactions to bio-oxidative therapies are extremely small. For example, a German study on 384,775 patients evaluating the adverse side effects of over five million medically-administered ozone treatments found that the ra te of adverse side effects was only 0.0007 per application. This figure is far lower than any other type of medical therapy.8

It has been estimated that over ten million people (primarily in Germany, Russia and Cuba) have been given bio-oxidative therapies over the past seventy years to treat over fifty different diseases. As cited before, they include heart and blood vessel dis eases, diseases of the lungs, infectious diseases, and immune-related disorders. In some cases, bio-oxidative therapies are administered alone, while in others, they are used in addition to traditional medical procedures (such as surgery or chemotherapy) or as adjuncts to alternative health practices like megavitamin therapy, acupuncture or herbal medicine.

Q: If these therapies are so great, why aren't they used more widely in Canada and The USA?
A: Despite the fact that both ozone and hydrogen peroxide therapy have been proven in clinical trials (and in regular clinical practice) to be safe and effective in Germany, Austria, Cuba, Mexico, Italy and Russia, very few people have heard about bio-ox idative therapies in the United States and Canada. Although an estimated 15,000 European practitioners legally use bio-oxidative therapies in their practices, the number of physicians using these therapies in North America is probably fewer than 500. This is partly due to the fact that information about medical ozone and hydrogen peroxide is not provided in medical schools, and students simply do not learn about them. In addition, the medical establishment (and especially provincial and state medical boar ds) often discourages or prevents licensed physicians from using them in their medical practice. Some, like Dr. Robert Atkins, M.D., the author of the popular book Dr. Atkins' Diet Revolution, have been threatened with having their licenses revoked if th ey administer hydrogen peroxide or ozone. Clinics have been closed down and practitioners have been threatened with jail.

Q: Why is there so much prejudice against these therapies by the medical establishment?
A: A major reason for this lack of interest in bio-oxidative therapies is that ozone and hydrogen peroxide are non-patentable substances that are very inexpensive to manufacture and use. In Germany, Russia and Cuba, physicians have successfully treated m any serious and chronic conditions (including cancer and heart disease) without expensive surgery. The net cost of the materials for a treatment of autohemotherapy or a medical infusion of hydrogen peroxide is under $10. Even though physicians must includ e professional fees and the use of their offices and equipment, bio-oxidative therapies administered in a medical setting cost up to fifty percent less than traditional therapies, especially for patients suffering from chronic and degenerative diseases. Self-administered treatments by patients themselves, while not recommended, can cost far less. For these reasons, ozone and hydrogen peroxide pose a threat to the continued dominance of the medical establishment: the pharmaceutical industry, medical cente rs and physicians who are accustomed to providing expensive drugs, complex medical procedures and long hospital stays.

Q: But why don't agencies like the FDA and Health and Welfare Canada encourage clinical trials on these therapies?
A: Because government health agencies are often influenced by the pharmaceutical industry and medical lobbies, objective investigation and development of effective protocols for bio-oxidative therapies have been difficult to undertake. However, the Canadi an government has shown a greater willingness to investigate these therapies than American government agencies like the FDA or NIH, as shown by the HIV studies cited earlier. However, like the American press, the Canadian media largely ignored the importa nt findings that ozone can completely remove HIV, hepatitis and herpes viruses from the blood supply.

Q: What is the future of bio-oxidative therapies?
A: After reviewing the laboratory and clinical evidence regarding the use of ozone and hydrogen peroxide, a recent report by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on Alternative Medical Systems and Practices in the United States has recommended that "de finitive studies be undertaken to determine whether these treatments have any utility".10 At the same time, a number of states- including New York and North Carolina- have recently passed "freedom of medicine" laws which allow the use of experimental th erapies by licensed practitioners. Many physicians who are members of IBOMF from both Canada and the United States are sharing their clinical data with the goal of presenting their findings to government agencies like the NIH and FDA.

Medical ozone and hydrogen peroxide form the "cutting edge" of a new healing paradigm, involving safe, effective, natural and less costly forms of medical therapy. As more people discover the value of these therapies, there will be greater consumer demand . Because bio-oxidative therapies like hydrogen peroxide and ozone hold great promise in treating both minor health problems and some of the most devastating diseases confronting humanity today, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, and HIV-related pr oblems at low cost, they can help solve our national health care crisis. As more physicians become acquainted with the value of these therapies, they will become a valuable part of mainstream medical practice.

Notes

Oliver, T.H. and Murphy, D.V., "Influenzal Pneumonia: The Intravenous Use of Hydrogen Peroxide", The Lancet, February 21, 1920, pp. 432-3.
Shallenberger, Frank, "Intravenous Ozone Therapy in HIV-related Disease" Proceedings: Fourth International Bio-Oxidative Medicine Conference, April 1993.
Farr, Charles H., letter to the author, February 4, 1994.
Shallenberger, Frank, letter to the author, December 9, 1993.
Oxidative Therapy, (Oklahoma City: IBOMF, n.d.)
Baggs, A.C., "Are Worry-Free Transfusions Just a Whiff of Ozone Away?" Canadian Medical Association Journal, (April 1, 1993) :1159
Shannon, Cmdr. Michael, letter to the author, 21 January, 1994.
Jacobs, Marie Theres, "Adverse Effects and Typical Complications in Ozone-Oxygen Therapy", Ozonachrichten, 1982: (1), pp. 193-201
Carpendale, M.T., Interview in Ozone and the Politics of Medicine (Vancouver, Threshold Film, 1993).
Alternative Medicine: Expanding Medical Horizons (Washington: U.S. Government Printing office, 1994)
Nathaniel Altman is the author over fifteen books on diet and health, including Oxygen Healing Therapies , which was published in April by Healing Arts Press, and distributed in Canada by Alive Books.
[ISBN: 0-89281-527-2, illustrated, 201 pp., trade paper, $12.95].

NATHANIEL ALTMAN

169 Prospect Park West Brooklyn, New York 11215 (718) 499-2384 fax (718) 499-3129

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Iodine And The Pineal

The pineal gland has been called "the mind's eye". Also, the "Eye of Horus". Some call it the "third eye". Do an internet search for any of these terms and see what you find out. Here is one:
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/thirdtyepinealgland.htm


If one closes their eyes, they can sense the focus of their consciousness shift upward, to a region in the middle of the forehead.

Few realize that the pineal gland contains photoreceptor cells. Why would a gland that is in the middle of the brain have photoreceptor cells ?

Few realize that the pineal gland also contains small amounts of a magnetic form of iron oxide. Some scientists attribute the sense of direction to this.

Few are aware that the pineal also contains calcite, a particular form of calcium carbonate, which when subjected to tiny pressures can , by the piezoelectric effect, generate tiny electrical currents.

Still fewer are aware that FLUORIDE is now known to accumulate in the pineal gland. Jennifer Luke, PhD. did her dissertation on this in the 1990's.


http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/12/30/fluoride_accumulates_in_pineal_gland.htm


From this article, it is evident that large amounts of FLUORIDE accumulate in the pineal. Probably exists as calcium fluoride, which is a highly stable calcium compound having fluoride atoms bridging between calciums in a network lattice.

Do you think that the pineal can function properly if it is plastered with FLUORIDE ?

I am of the opinion that FLUORIDE effectively de-commissions the mind's eye.

I am also aware that the pineal is not protected by the blood-brain barrier, and it receives a constant large supply of blood, probably receives more blood than the kidneys. Evidently, nature meant for the pineal to interact with large volumes of blood, constantly.

I am also aware from the many articles authored by several MD's that iodine can cause removal of FLUORIDE from the body.

I would like to suggest therefore that iodine therapy may be a potent tool in assisting in the restoration of the normal function of the mind's eye, in subjects whose pineal glands have accumulated large amounts of fluoride over a lifetime.

If after prolonged iodine ingestion, people begin reporting increased episodes of ESP, I would not be surprised in the least. Iodine could be the key to remote viewing.

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Friday, March 16, 2007

Health Benefits Of Apple Cider Vinegar

From NewsTarget.com The well-known saying, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away," is actually derived from the old English saying:
"To eat an apple before going to bed will make the doctor beg for his bread."

The undisputed benefits of eating apples, however, can be further multiplied many fold by the consumption of apple cider vinegar (ACV). A veritable host of vitamins, minerals and other nutrients and substances is available in ACV to improve and reinforce health.

The Bragg family, who make the famous Bragg's Apple Cider Vinegar, like to tell the following story: Farmer Bragg had an old hen prepared for dinner. The old hen's meat was tough and didn't taste good (this being what happens to poultry and beef when it's deficient in potassium; human flesh suffers the same problems). To prove to the children that ACV and raw honey needed to be an important part of their daily nutrition, he would then select another old hen for the dinner table. But this time he fed that old hen ACV twice a day. For a week to 10 days he gave the hen the ACV mixture. When the hen was prepared for the dinner table, the children saw the difference in the old hen's meat. They tasted how tender it was. It was just like eating a young hen.

When acid crystals harden in the joints and tissues of any animal, the joints become stiff and the tissues become hardened. The meat becomes tough and tasteless. But, when the animals are given ACV regularly, the precipitated acid crystals enter into a solution and pass out of the body, thus making the body tissues healthier and tender. This applies to human flesh also.

Now, when body tissues hold all the precipitated acid crystals they can, the crystals next appear in the bursae and joints of the body, resulting in arthritis and bursitis. One to two teaspoons of ACV with one to two teaspoons of raw honey in a glass of water daily will help relieve the stiff aching and prematurely old joints. You be the judge. See how elastic and well-oiled your joints will become!

Even the very healthiest people must continually fight the build-up of acid crystals in the body. The strongest solvent of acid crystals is a simple drink made up of ACV, raw honey and water. This powerful daily mixture puts the acid crystals in solution so they can be flushed out of the body by the kidneys and other organs of elimination. The malic acid content of the ACV dissolves calcium deposits in joints, while ACV acts to balance the acid-alkaline pH levels in the body and helps to oxygenate the blood.

Animal proteins and fats have a tendency to thicken the blood. Blood has to circulate all over the body through the arteries, blood vessels and tiny capillaries, and it's impossible for blood to circulate freely through these incredibly thin pipes when it's thickened with too much protein. However, the natural acids in ACV help keep the blood healthier and thinner. It's been reported that soaring blood pressure can be dramatically reduced by a 48-hour fasting program with only ACV, raw honey and water (five glasses a day plus additional water) being taken; a longer program, without the fasting, is said to work just as well.

ACV also prevents the growth of bacteria and mold. The acid content of ACV helps reduce the chance of bacterial or fungal growth on fresh foods. If you use conventionally grown produce, you can remove pesticide residues by spraying fruit and vegetables with ACV, then waiting five minutes and rinsing. Similarly, to eliminate bacteria fromorganic or conventional produce, spray it with ACV, wait five minutes and rinse. ACV can also be sprayed on seeds during the sprouting period to prevent the growth of bacteria or fungi: Simply place ACV in a mister bottle and spray your seeds thoroughly with ACV after each rinse with fresh water until the seeds are sprouted. You can rinse the ACV from the sprouts before serving if you dislike the taste!

ACV has been helpful as an aid for digestion, helping to break down minerals, protein and fats. It also inhibits the growth of unfriendly bacteria in the digestive tract. ACV has detoxifying properties, strengthens the immune system and may ameliorate viral, bacterial and fungal infections. It's used as an antibacterial and anti-inflammatory medicine and has a natural antibiotic effect.

Its benefits also include alleviating respiratory infections and may reduce symptoms such as watery eyes and nasal discharge with complete relief of pollen, food and pet allergies. If you live in a highly polluted area where allergies and sinus infections are rampant, your system may better balance itself with a small dose of ACV each day. ACV has also been reported to cure sinus infections, acne, high cholesterol, chronic fatigue, Candida, acid reflux, sore throats, contact dermatitis, arthritis and gout. Many find it to be a general energy tonic. It can be used to sooth sunburns and insect bites, to make your hair shine, and to treat dandruff. A wonderful side effect of drinking ACV every day is that it brings a healthy, rosy glow to one's complexion. This is great news if you suffer from a pale countenance. And, what's more – although no one is quite sure how – ACV also seems to break down fat and is widely reported to be a gradual, yet permanent and effective aid for losing weight.

Many commercial ACVs have been pasteurized, filtered, refined or distilled in order to make the product look good, and thereby be more appealing to the general public. Unfortunately, this extra processing destroys much of the healthy goodness of the product. The best type of ACV to use is one made from cold-pressed, organically grown whole apples, to which no chemicals or preservatives have been added, which contain the "mother of vinegar," and are not pasteurized. This "mother," as it is affectionately known, is a natural gelatinous substance formed during the final fermentation step. This type of especially wholesome ACV can be found readily in most health food stores and even in some general grocery stores.

Kelly Joyce Neff has an interdisciplinary degree in Celtic Studies which includes work in cultural anthropology, history, linguistics, language, and literature. She is a traditional midwife and herbalist, a reiki master, and an active craftsperson. She lives in San Francisco.

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :
The Abraham Cherrix cancer story the media won't print: Harry Hoxsey's cancer cures and the US government campaign to destroy them
by Jessica Fraser

The idea of health freedom is one Americans likely never consider. Certain freedoms in this country are taken for granted -- like the freedoms of speech and religion -- so freedom to choose a method of health care seems a given. Unfortunately, recent cases have brought to the public's attention the startling truth that the government can (and does) make medical decisions for Americans, whether or not they agree.
This is especially the case concerning parents' decisions to treat their children's diseases with alternative therapies over traditional, and often harmful, treatments. The most recent in a host of such cases involves a 16-year-old Virginia boy named Abraham Cherrix, who was diagnosed in August 2005 with Hodgkin's disease -- a cancer of the lymph nodes. After his initial diagnosis, Abraham submitted to chemotherapy, which made him feel sick and weak. His cancer went into brief remission before returning earlier this year, when he decided he would not undergo more chemotherapy, but rather try alternative herbal treatments. Abraham's parents supported their son's decision and began taking him to the Hoxsey Clinic in Mexico for treatments involving cancer-fighting herbs and an organic diet.

The story should end there. Abraham and his parents should be taking their son to the clinic in Tijuana, with no interference. However, the Virginia Department of Social Services decided to get involved, and asked the state court to require Abraham's parents to return him to a hospital in Virginia for conventional treatment, which would include stronger chemotherapy than he'd previously undergone, as well as radiation therapy. The court agreed and ordered Abraham's parents to give consent for their son to be treated with harsh chemo treatments at Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters in Norfolk.

That's right: The court ordered his parents to give consent, which flies in the face of the spirit of "consent," which by definition involves a willing agreement between the consenting parties. Fortunately for their son's health, Abraham's parents refused, and an ongoing court battle began -- but for how long can Abraham's family fend off the courts seeking to subject their son to a "therapy" that comes with side effects ranging from pain and hair loss to vomiting and infections?


Does the state own your body?
Americans should be disturbed by Abraham's ordeal, regardless of whether or not they believe alternative treatments work. As Abraham's family lawyer put it: "This is not a case about what treatment is best. It's a case about who gets to decide." Other recent cases of health authorities revoking parents' rights to treat their children with natural therapies eclipse even Abraham's nightmare.
Take, for instance, the case of 13-year-old Katie Wernecke, a Texas girl diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease in January 2005. After her parents took her to the hospital for what they believed was pneumonia, she was treated with chemotherapy, and doctors also wanted to give her radiation therapy. Her parents declined, citing possible complications such as stunted growth, an increase in breast cancer risk and learning difficulties. They opted to try an alternative therapy involving high doses of intravenous vitamin C, but before they got to try the much safer therapy, Texas Child Protective Services intervened.

Unlike Abraham's case, Katie was taken away from her parents after they were labeled "neglectful" by the state, and her mother was arrested and thrown in jail for taking Katie to hide at a family ranch to avoid the ordered "treatment."

On a June 9 episode of NBC's "Today Show," viewers saw a videotaped statement from Katie, who said, "I don't need radiation treatment. And nobody asked me what I wanted. It's my body."

Apparently, the state of Texas disagreed with the ownership of Katie's body -- a district court judge eventually ruled that the Werneckes would be allowed to treat Katie with the vitamin C treatments, but only after she underwent five days of court-ordered chemotherapy. What's worse, her parents weren't allowed to be with her during the chemo they'd fought so hard to avoid.


Outrage at medical terrorism is compounded by efforts of medical establishment to silence cancer cures
People might be justifiably outraged to hear of Abraham's and Katie's trials, or they might believe that the government acted in the best interest of the young patients in attempting to force on them the only known "treatment" for cancer. Hold the phone, though. What would Americans think if they heard that traditional cancer treatments are not the only therapy, and that safe, effective cancer cures have been around for decades? Moreover, what would they think if they heard that trusted medical establishments charged with protecting the health of Americans -- such as the American Medical Association -- have waged a decades-long battle against such cancer cures in an attempt to keep them from the public?
Enter Harry Hoxsey, founder of the "Hoxsey Method" with which Abraham Cherrix is attempting to treat his cancer. Hoxsey is the great-grandson of John Hoxsey, an American physician who discovered a remarkably effective cancer cure in 1840 by watching horses with cancer cure themselves by foraging for certain rare herbs.

Harry Hoxsey, a coal miner with no formal medical training, began promoting his great-grandfather's cancer formula -- which contained a number of herbs, including bloodroot, burdock, red clover, licorice root, pokeroot, barberry root, buckthorn, prickly ash, stillingia root and cascara -- in the 1930s. He also marketed a salve for external cancers, called an "escharotic," which essentially burns off external cancers. His treatments proved amazingly effective at curing cancer, and word of his cancer treatments spread. People from all over the country -- including "terminal" patients conventional doctors had given up on -- sought out his treatments, no matter where he was practicing, and a high number of them were successfully cured.

Hoxsey was not a doctor, and could not legally practice medicine -- even if he was offering genuine cancer cures -- so to stay in business, he partnered with various MDs throughout his life, letting them do the official "treatments" while he acted as "technician." Though he never claimed to be a licensed physician, he was arrested hundreds of times over the course of his life, mostly for practicing medicine without a license -- including 119 arrests between 1926 and 1931 alone. According to Ralph W. Moss' "Herbs Against Cancer," Hoxsey had even taken to carrying $10,000 in cash every day to bail himself out of jail.

At the height of his popularity in the 1950s, Hoxsey was operating a chain of cancer clinics in Texas, and had seven licensed physicians working for him. He'd earned a Doctorate of Naturopathy in Texas, and helped tens of thousands of patients cure their cancer without surgery, chemotherapy or radiation, using herbal treatments and escharotic therapies.


Organized medicine's campaign to eradicate cancer cures
People may wonder why the American public hasn't heard of Hoxsey, if his treatments were so effective and cured so many. The answer is because large-scale, vicious attacks by U.S. health agencies eventually sent Hoxsey packing to Mexico, where he could finally practice herbal healing in relative peace. One might also wonder what "health" agency would ever knowingly drive a cure for cancer out of the country. The American Medical Association (AMA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) would, just to name a few.
Why? Cliché as it may sound, they did it for political power. The AMA has historically been considered the "gold standard" of Western medicine -- a privilege that comes with vast control over what is and is not considered genuine medicine. Efforts to preserve and gain such political power have garnered the AMA a shady history rife with efforts to suppress natural and alternative treatments. For example, a small group of chiropractors won a landmark antitrust suit against the AMA in 1990 in the U.S. Court of Appeals 7th circuit, which ruled the AMA had violated the Sherman Act by "conducting an illegal boycott in restraint of the trade directed at chiropractors generally, and at the four plaintiffs in particular," This demonstrates the association's willingness to target entire alternative fields, as well as individuals within them.

Though a large part of the AMA's stated mission is to be "an essential force for progress in improving the nation's health," it was without a doubt Hoxsey's biggest enemy, and is largely responsible for driving him and his treatments out of the country. Morris Fishbein, editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) -- the AMA's flagship medical journal -- from 1924 to 1949, particularly targeted Hoxsey and his therapy, labeling Hoxsey a "quack" while simultaneously refusing to study his therapies or their efficacy. Fishbein went out of his way to sully Hoxsey's name in JAMA publications, and was eventually found guilty of libeling Hoxsey in two 1947 suits. "Fishbein had written an 'excoriating editorial' in JAMA titled 'Hoxsey -- Cancer Charlatan.' He also co-authored an article in the Hearst newspaper chain's weekly newsmagazine, titled 'Blood Money,'" writes Moss in "Herbs Against Cancer." Without evidence, Fishbein's JAMA articles attacked Hoxsey's treatment, claiming it "ate into blood vessels" and killed patients, Moss writes.


The FDA used money and corrupt political influence to chase Hoxsey out of America, state by state
The FDA, for its part in the Hoxsey debacle, used its influence to get courts in the states in which Hoxsey tried to practice to revoke the licenses of the physicians he worked with. "The FDA had limitless financial and publicity resources," writes Moss. "When Hoxsey employed physicians to give his treatment, Texas courts revoked their licenses and forbade him from operating a clinic. When he turned the clinic over to someone else, FDA secured a court order requiring the Hoxsey clinic to write individually to all patients and inform them that the treatment was no longer available. The final blow came on October 29, 1958 when the FDA simultaneously padlocked his clinics in a single day." Hoxsey's longtime nurse and current operator of his clinic in Mexico, Mildred Nelson, said, "In no way did Harry have the money to fight that state by state."
The NCI helped eradicate the Hoxsey method from U.S. soil in a somewhat different manner -- by giving him hope that the government would finally investigate his treatment, only to let him down on more than one occasion.

In 1945, Hoxsey met with three congressmen at the NCI offices in Maryland, where NCI director R.R. Spencer laid out the details of what the institute would need to review Hoxsey's method. Hoxsey went back to Texas and compiled above and beyond what the NCI had asked for, only to be told that his information was too incomplete and fragmented for investigation. However, in 1947, the NCI asked him to resubmit the information he'd sent before, for reconsideration by new staff members at the institute. He sent it, and soon received a reply that his records were still inadequate for consideration, and no government investigation would occur.

However, Hoxsey's cancer cures were not entirely without government approval. Dr. John Heinerman writes in "Natural Pet Cures" that: "A Dallas judge ruled in federal court that Hoxsey's therapy was 'comparable to surgery, radium and x-ray in its effectiveness, without the destructive side effects of those treatments.' (Hoxsey) faced unrelenting opposition and harassment from a hostile medical establishment. The AMA, NCI, and FDA organized a 'conspiracy' to 'suppress' a fair, unbiased assessment of Hoxsey's methods, according to a 1953 report to Congress."

In spite of that court's approval, Hoxsey's clinics in Dallas were shut down in the 1950s, and he moved his practice to Mexico. Hoxsey died in 1974, and his nurse, Mildred Nelson, has carried the torch at the Tijuana-based Bio-Medical Center ever since, caring for patients such as Abraham Cherrix.


Hoxsey's cancer cures really work
Though the government agencies that drove Hoxsey from the United States never bothered to test his therapy and called him a "quack" out of hand because he did not have a medical license, research has proven the efficacious effects of the herbs in his formulas.
For example, red clover has long been used as an herbal remedy for cancer, infections, tumors and menopause symptoms. It also supports the immune system and the blood. Burdock fights skin disorders and cancer, and supports the liver, skin and immune system. Licorice root is used for a myriad of health conditions ranging from inflammation and arthritis to cancer and heart disease. It supports the immune system, the blood, and the function of the spleen.

Pokeroot has shown anti-cancer properties, especially for breast cancers. Similarly, bloodroot is a powerful fighter against skin cancer. Cascara is a natural treatment for leukemia and liver disorders, and supports liver and gallbladder function. Stillingia root also treats skin conditions and acts as a blood purifier.

Though Hoxsey's formula often uses broad combinations of powerful herbs such as red clover and bloodroot, as well as many others, his formula is adapted to specially fit each individual patient, adding or removing herbal components case-by-case. The Hoxsey method also incorporates a healthy organic diet, along with vitamins and immune stimulation. While official government studies have never been performed, other forms of honest evidence support the benefits and success of Hoxsey's method.

"Today substantial laboratory data indicates that the Hoxsey herbal tonic could have genuine value against cancer," writes Kenny Ausubel in "When Healing Becomes A Crime." Ausubel continues, "Thousands of patients believe it saved their lives. There is no dispute that the Hoxsey remedies for external cancer are effective. Over the course of this century, numerous prominent figures including senators, congressmen, judges, and even doctors have affirmed Hoxsey's reputed cures and repeatedly called for an investigation. Why, then, has it taken so long? The answer is buried in medical politics. It revolves around a fierce trade war fought over money as well as fundamental conflict of medical opinion. Its consequence has been the exclusion and outright suppression of Hoxsey as well as numerous other unorthodox cancer therapies."


Alternative practitioners suffer from medical establishment's meddling, but patients suffer more
Unfortunately, Hoxsey's therapy is far from the only alternative treatment to be railroaded by conventional medical authorities. Unorthodox medical therapies have been forced to relocate to Mexico and other countries free of the red tape surrounding American medical politics.
Who suffers most from such medical bias and political lust? Sure, the alternative practitioners suffer, but so do countless Americans who are kept in the dark about natural, effective, safe treatments for diseases traditional practitioners treat with toxic chemotherapy and radiation -- which seem to kill the patients more often than save them. What's worse, the U.S. medical establishment seems to have convinced much of the country that its poisonous cancer "treatments" are the only option, and anyone who does not subject themselves or their children to it are criminals who must be punished.

"Since the early 1970s when President Nixon declared the War on Cancer, two trillion dollars have been spent on conventional cancer treatment and research, with the result that more Americans are dying of cancer than ever before," writes Walter Last in "The Natural Way to Heal: 65 Ways to Create Superior Health."

That's $2 trillion down the drain studying dangerous treatments that likely cause cancer as often as they temporarily delay its symptoms. Meanwhile, how much money does the FDA, AMA and NCI waste forcing holistic therapies like Hoxsey's out of the country? Today, such agencies have the public convinced that anyone seeking alternative therapies for serious diseases like cancer is misguided, uninformed and naive, and must be forced to submit to conventional treatments ostensibly for their own good, even if it is against their will.

A foundational principle of the United States is the freedom of its citizens to choose what is best for them, including how best to treat disease. With cases like Abraham Cherrix and Katie Wernecke seeing increasing media coverage, perhaps Americans will begin to realize how close they are to losing their health freedom. Medical agencies have already won many of the health freedom battles by successfully driving alternative therapies from U.S. soil, but it is far from too late for such offenses to be reversed. Americans may yet re-win their right to be in charge of their own bodies, regardless of the medical political scheming of the AMA, FDA and NCI.

Perhaps Abraham Cherrix says it best: "I think it's my body. I can choose what's best for my body. If I don't have the right to do that, then I don't have any rights at all anyway."

From www.newstarget.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Beating Cancer

Beating cancer -- how to take charge of your cancer cure and outlive the lies of the cancer industry
by Mike Adams

Here's an example of how backwards health care really is in this country: it's actually front-page news that a cancer center is serving anti-cancer foods in its cafeteria. This is taking place at the Miami Cancer Center at Mercy Hospital. And it's apparently a big deal. Wow! Front-page news. Nation-wide news. Here is a cancer center serving foods that actually prevent cancer. Who woulda thunk it? Just the fact that this is news tells you how backwards the health care system in this country is, because if they're just now serving anti-cancer foods, what on earth have they been serving up until today? Cancer-causing foods?
Today, you can find fast food restaurants, pizza joints and hamburger stands in hospitals all across the country. It should be an embarrassment to organized medicine. It should be an outrage to every patient who enters such an institution. These are supposed to be places of health, yet they are serving people foods with toxic ingredients like sodium nitrate, saturated animal fats, refined white flour in the buns of these hamburgers and MSG in the meats. There's sugar in the tomato sauce, acrylamides in the fried foods, and hardly a speck of life left in the menus of most hospitals. There is truly dangerous food being served right now in cafeterias at cancer centers, hospitals, clinics, and, of course, public schools, all across the country.


Stop killing the hospital patients with junk food
There's a heart surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic who has taken a stand and said, "We want McDonalds out of this clinic. We want these junk food and fast food restaurants out." But the staff there is against him. They say, "We want our junk food. We want our diabetes-promoting, heart disease-promoting, cancer-causing foods. It's our choice." They want this stuff. Gosh, I hate to say it, but have you ever been in a hospital and looked at the health of the nursing staff? I used to volunteer in a nursing home. I have seen it first-hand. These are not the healthiest people in the world, not by a long shot.
I'm sorry if I'm offending anyone with this, especially if you're trying to make a positive difference. I'm not trying to attack any particular individual, but how can we call this health care? How can we call it anything other than a disease care system? It's a sick care system, and the whole system itself is sick. It thrives on sickness. It thrives on keeping people sick by actually feeding them disease-promoting foods as they come into the hospital (and a little more disease-promoting food when they leave the hospital). By the way, right in the middle of your surgery recovery, they're going to bring you more disease-causing foods, right to your bedside. They're going to charge you gourmet meal prices for that food, even while it's loaded with chemicals that will probably make it even harder for your body to recover from whatever surgical procedure you just endured.


How dare they call it medicine
It's just outrageous. Sometimes I get emails from doctors who say I'm outrageous. They say, "How dare you question organized medicine? How dare you think that you know anything about nutrition or healing?" I say back to them, "How dare you claim to be a doctor when you're working in a system that's feeding disease-promoting foods to patients! How dare you claim to be a doctor! On one hand, you claim to have all this medical knowledge, and, on the other hand, you're sick, your staff is sick, your patients are sick and you are feeding them disease-causing foods inside and outside the hospital. You're not even teaching people how to be healthy. How dare you call yourself an M.D. or a doctor! You have no such right."
A medical degree does not give you the right to claim you know how to heal people. You know nothing about healing until you venture outside the bounds of traditional organized medicine and have healed yourself first. If you have a healthy body and mind and a healthy sense of self esteem, and you don't have to step on all the people around you with your over-inflated ego, and if you have the ability to be a healer and share information with people and help uplift people around you, then you can call yourself a doctor, and it doesn't matter what degree you have. You can call yourself a doctor when you are a true healer, not when you have a medical degree and you work in an institution of disease called a hospital or a cancer center.


All hail the cancer center
When I say institutions of disease, I mean it. Look at what they're named -- an institution that's supposed to be treating people with cancer. What's it called? It's called a cancer center, as if it's a center erected to worship cancer. It's a cancer center.
Shouldn't it be called an anti-cancer center? Shouldn't it be called a health or wellness center? Well, no, it's not their focus. Their focus is on cancer. It's called a cancer center, almost as if it's some kind of monument to the disease. I think that all the people whose jobs depend on disease in some way worship the disease. They worship them because those diseases give them job security. The very names of these institutions eliminate any possibility of living in a world free of cancer, because if you have an institution named the Cancer Center, then how in the world can anybody who works there even consider the possibility of curing cancer? Then what would it be? It would be the Empty Cancer Center. It would be the Closed Down Cancer Center.

Shouldn't these institutions really be there to try to help people eliminate cancer? But that's not what all these cancer centers are doing. They are really there to manage these diseases. I say, bring in the alternative healers, and help these people be free of cancer. I can't tell you how many people I've talked to -- clinicians, people trained in herbal medicine and Traditional Chinese Medicine, or even those trained in Western medicine -- who are doing some advanced research on cancer. They've cured cancer, or more accurately, they've helped patients cure their own cancers, because cancer is a disease that is actually quite easy to beat, especially if it's caught in the early stages.

This is not a difficult disease to eliminate, but in modern medicine they try to make it complicated. They try to talk about the microbiology of what's happening, at the cellular level, what's happening with the angiogenesis factors and the genetic influences. They try to figure out the biochemistry and physics, but they get lost in all the details. They forget about the big picture, which is, "Hey, we want this patient to be free of cancer. What do we have that really works?"


Many cures for cancer exist right now
At last count, in my own research, I counted 18 cures for cancers -- 18 different cures. They cover all different kinds of cancer: multiple myeloma, brain tumors, leukemia, breast cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, lung cancer and many others. Eighteen different cures for cancer. Now, the FDA says, "Oh no, you can't claim there's a cure for cancer." And organized medicine says, "Oh no, you can't claim there's a cure. There's no such thing as a cure." Then, if a patient is actually cured using some of these therapies, organized medicine still won't admit they're cured. They don't have the guts to stand up and say that maybe they were wrong, and maybe there is a cure for cancer. They think, "No, no, no, there is no such thing." I don't think any cancer center will admit there is a cure for cancer. They'll say, "No, it's just a permanent remission."
I'm here to tell you that there are cures for cancer. In fact, every day when I go running through the desert, I'm jogging by literally tons and tons of anti-cancer desert plants right outside my back yard. People are being cured of cancer every single day all over the world. They are curing themselves of cancer. It is just that it has been criminalized here in the United States. It has been outlawed because we live in the Dark Ages of modern medicine, in a system of oppression that tries to censor the truth and make curing cancer illegal. It's a system that tries to discredit all these alternative therapies and at the same time, tries to make a fortune managing all of these diseases that are easily preventable and curable if people just turn to therapies like a raw foods diet or the elimination of all animal products and processed foods from their diets.

Remember, it's headline news that this cancer center is serving anti-cancer foods. That tells you just how far behind things are in this country. You would think with all the hundreds of millions of dollars that have gone into cancer research -- this so-called research that's going on to find a cure for cancer -- that with all these doctors who study cancer, all these oncologists trained in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and all this incredible research that the pharmaceutical companies claim to be doing to make your life better... with all this going on, you would think somewhere along the line, somebody would have said, "Gee, maybe we should feed these people some anti-cancer foods."

It's common sense, right? If they put me in charge (which will never happen, so don't worry), I would walk in and scrap that whole menu at the cancer center, and I would give them a menu of serious anti-cancer foods: things like raw, organic vegan foods, loaded with broccoli, sprouts, cauliflower, kale, garlic, beans, berries, raw nuts and the like. After a couple of months of that, and some alternative therapies, those patients would never need to come back. Most of those patients would be free of cancer. Of course, that is one of the many reasons why they would never invite me to come in and do something like that. I would bankrupt these cancer centers by eliminating all their repeat business. I'd send people home cancer-free. And that's bad for business in the cancer industry. Their greatest fear, I believe, is that someone will actually promote a simple cure for cancer. It would wipe out a billion-dollar industry of profit and power.


Cancer cures from nature
Sometimes people say, "Okay, Mike, let's hear what you've got. You're talking big about this stuff. Name some anticancer foods." That's easy. Let's start with broccoli. Get some raw broccoli in your body. Broccoli sprouts are potent anticancer foods. Let's talk about some nutrition supplements -- selenium, zinc and modified citrus pectin for prostate cancer, for example. Vitamin D is a potent moderator of cancer tumor cell growth, so if you get enough vitamin D in your body, you're going to prevent and even help reverse prostate, cervical and breast cancers. The way you get vitamin D is to get some sunshine on your skin. This is not rocket science, folks. Doctors try to make it sound complicated, but it isn't.
You have anticancer properties in blueberries, and in all of the small fruits – blackberries, raspberries, acai and goji berries from Asia. Then you have onion, ginger and garlic. Garlic is phenomenal as an anti-cancer food. It contains sulphur compounds that just obliterate cancer cells. You've got spirulina, which contains anticancer phytochemicals called phycocyanin, which provide a blue-green color. When injected into breast tumors in laboratory studies in Japan, it's been shown to cause breast tumors to self-destruct. You've got chlorella and oxygen treatments. There is a product out there called Cell Food; when you take it into your body, it creates nascent oxygen and hydrogen. This oxygen helps create an environment in the body in which your body naturally eliminates its own cancerous cells. That's just the tip of the iceberg here.

Then you have traditional Chinese medicine, with some powerful anti-cancer herbs. There's an outstanding book on that by Michael Tierra, who is a master herbalist, and really one of the best herbalist authors out there. He's got a book called Treating Cancer with Herbs. This book teaches you about medicinal mushrooms -- the reishi mushrooms and the shitake mushrooms. Beyond that, we have anti-cancer oils: salmon oil, flax oil and cod liver oil. The list just goes on and on.

I haven't really covered them all, but in addition all those healing foods, there are all the foods you can eliminate from your diet to stop poisoning your body and stop giving yourself cancer. What are those foods? Well, there's sodium nitrate, which is in almost every processed meat product, found in every grocery store in the world, so if you just eliminate processed meats, your cancer risk plummets. You should also eliminate hydrogenated oils and partially-hydrogenated oils, both of which strongly promote cancer.

Eliminate homogenized milk and dairy products. Stop drinking liquids excreted from the glands of other species. (You thirsty pervert...) Eliminate all red meat from your diet. Eliminate all liquid refined sugar, such as soft drinks made of high-fructose corn syrup. Eliminate all food additives, preservatives and artificial colors; eliminate MSG, which is known as monosodium glutamate, yeast extract, hydrolyzed vegetable protein and autolyzed vegetable protein. Eliminate aspartame and sucralose and all the artificial chemical sweeteners. Eliminate white flour; stop barbecuing your meat, because barbecuing meat creates chemicals that cause colon cancer and stomach cancer. Stop cooking your food at extremely high temperatures. Or, better yet, become a live foods vegan. I'm just naming off a few things. You can be cancer-free if you follow the recipe.


Curing cancer is not profitable
So why aren't the cancer centers in this country giving people this recipe? It's freely available. I just named off some of the best strategies out there that are very easy to follow. So why aren't cancer centers giving people this information? Ill tell you why. There's no money in it. A world free of cancer is a world without any paying cancer patients. That's why there's virtually NO effort or investment being spent on the prevention of this disease.
The answers to cancer, to living free of this disease, are right here in front of us, right now. You can walk outside your door and look at nature, and those are the answers to cancer right there. It's not that difficult. It's eating foods of different colors; the rainbow diet. There's an anti-cancer strategy right there. There's another book called, Eat to Beat Cancer that lists all the anti-cancer foods out there, everything from nuts and peanuts to legumes, brown rice, onions, kale, spinach and cauliflower. If you do these things right, you won't have cancer. There's another book by Dr. Gabriel Cousens called Conscious Eating that gives you loads of information on using live foods to eliminate chronic disease (and heal the planet, too).

Cancer is not a matter of luck. Only doctors and pharmaceutical companies want you to think it's a matter of luck. If they can convince you to believe that, then you'll go through life thinking it doesn't matter what you eat, and then you are much more likely to have a poor diet and end up with the disease, which makes them a lot of money.

I am just astonished at what we have in this country -- this system that claims to offer health care is a complete myth. There is no health care. There is just disease management, exploitation and profiteering. That's the system we have in this country today, and the fact that it is headline news that a cancer center is serving anti-cancer foods is proof that we still live in the Dark Ages of modern medicine. We still live in an age of censorship and oppression, distortion and propaganda. The organizations out there pushing the pro-cancer propaganda include every major medical association and disease organization you can name. They also include medical journals that disallow the publication of articles on alternative medicine. These are some of the players who are defending this "Dark Ages" system they call medicine, which is really just a gimmick to turn the human body into a profit-generating machine for Big Pharma.


You were designed to live in a state of perfect health
How do I know all this to be true at a personal level? Because I'm the healthiest I've ever been in my life. I am healthy because I fired my doctor, I swore off prescription drugs and I started teaching myself about health and nutrition. I reversed my disease. I eliminated chronic back pain and I eliminated my borderline diabetes, obesity and depression. I did it all by turning to nature and ignoring all the information from modern medicine, companies, the FDA, the mainstream press, medical schools, cancer centers and everybody else. That information will, in my opinion, lead to a life of chronic pain, degenerative disease, and medical bankruptcy.
If you want to be healthy, you've got to acknowledge your human nature and your interaction with the natural world around you. You have a blueprint for health in you right now. You're supposed to be healthy. That's your DNA. Doctors always talk about DNA as providing a blueprint for disease, which is hogwash. They never tell you about how your DNA actually is designed to keep you at a perfect point of health. That's the whole point of the DNA -- to pass on a blueprint that lets you survive and reproduce. That's basic science, folks. How on earth can doctors think that DNA passed down through hundreds of thousands of generations could have a gene that would cause heart disease? That's ridiculous. They must not know anything at all about natural selection, because if someone caries a gene that kills them, guess what? They don't reproduce. So the genes that you have are genes that have survived and thrived through all of these generations, from healthy ancestry down to today, giving you the gift of a blueprint for perfect health.

The only reason you aren't in perfect health today, and the only reason we aren't healthy as a nation, is because we've gone off the map. We stopped following the blueprint. We changed our environment. We changed our foods, our diet, our levels of stress, our use of toxic products like personal care products, deodorants, shampoos, laundry products and soaps with triclosan and antibacterial chemicals. We started popping prescription drugs like a bunch of crack addicts in this country. Forty percent of the nation now is on prescription drugs. Then when people get sick, we poison them with chemotherapy and radiation, and we call it medicine.

So you want to be healthy? Get back to your nature. Recognize that you have a natural blueprint for being perfectly healthy. Now, as one disclaimer to all this, I want to tell you that it is important to work with a qualified health professional during any major health transition. That should be a naturopathic physician, ideally... or an M.D. who has really educated himself or herself about alternative medicine, nutrition and lifestyle changes. And there are such M.D.s out there. You just have to ask around and find one. You can't just settle for any old M.D., or you might get someone who is a big drug pusher.

And if you ever have to go to a hospital or cancer center, take my advice: Bring your own food. You don't want the stuff they're going to feed you; that is, unless you want to stick around the center for a lot longer. If that's the case, then go ahead and eat their hospital food. That will keep you in the hospital a few extra days, probably. But if you want to be healthy and free of disease, or if you want to recover from an injury or some kind of surgical procedure, bring your own food.

Real medicine is taking place at the personal level. It's taking place with education across the internet. It's taking place in the homes of people who are taking charge of their health. That's real medicine and real healing. Be part of it. Be healthy, and help us move out of the Dark Ages of modern medicine and into an era of authentic healing and disease prevention; an age where we can have the majority of the population healthy rather than chronically diseased and addicted to toxic prescription drugs. Be healthy yourself. Set a good example. My name is Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I thank you for your interest in this information.

From www.newstarget.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Bill Harris Discusses The Secret

Unless you've been living in a cave, you've heard of the hit DVD
movie, The Secret, which I was fortunate enough to have participated
in. The Secret has developed into quite a phenomenon. Many of the
teachers who appeared in it have appeared on Oprah! and Larry King
Live, and several other national television programs. Hundreds of
thousands of people have watched the DVD, and those who have are
hungry for information on how to implement what many people call the
Law of Attraction. This month I want to share my take on The Secret
and the Law of Attraction, and talk about what you can do to put
these principles into action in your own life.

As powerful as The Secret is, there are a few things—a few very
important things—it either leaves out, or de-emphasizes. I want to
discuss these things, because once you understand them you'll have
the maximum ability to use these important principles to take change
of your life. Without them, The Secret won't benefit you at all.

My belief is that there is a way, no matter who you are, and
regardless of your past or present circumstances, to master your
life, to master your mind, and to create anything you want in life.
The Secret describes a part of how to do that. It's a very important
part, but it's still just a part. I want to tell you about the other
parts, and share some of the practical details, the "how-to," of
what I and the other teachers talked about in The Secret, because
there's more to The Secret and the Law of Attraction than just
putting something out to the universe and hoping to get something
back.

As the people who made The Secret have said, it's true that for
thousands of years a certain small segment of the population has
known about and used this secret, and that those who've known it and
have used it have prospered in extraordinary ways, and have
influenced the world in ways that have seemed almost magical to
those who don't understand this secret. But you need to know more
than generalizations about this secret in order to fully implement
it, and I want to share some of that with you.

Before I get into some of the nuts and bolts, I want to tell you
about two aspects of this secret that were not emphasized in The
Secret DVD and book. I'm sharing this with you because these two
additional aspects of The Secret are crucial, and if you leave them
out, The Secret doesn't work.

What you focus on creates your life—but it ain't magic!
Let's start out, then, by acknowledging that it's true that you
create in reality, in one way or another, whatever you focus your
attention on. Your life is going to be an outcome of where you
predominantly place your attention. There are, of course, as I said,
some things you need to know about the how-to of this in order to
get all the benefits, and I'll talk about that in a moment. What is
unfortunate, in my opinion, is that all too often people think that
all you have to do is focus your attention on what you want, and
then, in some magic way, you'll get it.

I will say that the way this law works does seem like magic,
especially when you first use it and see your results suddenly
change from dismal to successful, but there is no magic involved,
and without the second two principles I'm going to share, you'll end
up being nothing but a wishful thinker, wondering how long
this "Secret" stuff is going to take. I know, because I get many
letters from people asking me how long it's going to take, and I
have to truthfully tell them that if all they do is focus their
attention on what they want, it's going to take forever.

So let's look at these other two principles I mentioned, and then
we'll get into some of the nuts and bolts of how to focus your mind
in a way that really works. The first principle you heard a lot
about in The Secret DVD, the fact that what you place your attention
on you tend to create or attract into your life. However, if you
stop there, not much happens. After you place your attention on what
you want to create or manifest, you have to use the second
principle, which is to then take action to get it.

Forget about the Wish Fairy
Yes, I hate to break this to you, but if you want money—or anything
else, for that matter—you can't just wish for it. Whether you want
great relationships, a fulfilling career, good health, or anything
else, in addition to focusing your attention on what you want, you
also have to take action.

And the action you take also has to, in some way, be of value to the
world, and to other people. You could act your ass off, but if your
action has no value for anyone, you won't get anything back. This is
why they call it the Law of Attraction. You get back what you put
out. To get value, you have to give value. That's the way it works.

For some of the people who come to me, or the other teachers you saw
in The Secret, life isn't working so well. I know what that's like,
because I used to be one of them. Such people aren't making much
money, usually. They very often aren't in a fulfilling career. Their
relationships aren't satisfying. They don't feel happy and peaceful.
Their health may not be very good. Many of them feel very lost in
the world. They sometimes feel like, well, like losers in the game
of life.

Often such people don't have the skills that allow them to offer a
lot of value. That doesn't mean that they couldn't develop those
skills, or in some other way figure out how to create value in the
world, but at the present time they either don't have the skills or
don't know how to use them to create benefit for others.

You see, the problem is that such people—and remember, I used to be
one of them, so I understand the thought process—such people would
LOVE to find out that there's a magic way to become prosperous,
popular, respected, happy, and loved. Then, when someone comes along
and tells them to just "put it out to the universe" it almost
becomes a cruel joke, because to create the kind of life I just
described, you have to do more than just think about it or wish for
it.

I want everyone who feels lost and discouraged about creating the
life they want to know that while you can't JUST focus your
attention on what you want, it isn't that difficult to add these
other two principles, and, having added them, you can learn how to
have everything you want in life. It isn't magic, and it isn't
difficult, but there is a price to pay. My career, once I found it,
albeit late in life, is about showing people what that price is, and
then showing them the easy way to pay it.

Here's how it works...
So let's look at the first principle, what most people think of now
as The Secret—the idea that what you place your attention on is
manifested in reality. This is a solid, real, principle, but it
isn't magic. Here's why this principle works—if, of course, you use
the other two principles with it.

When you focus your attention on something you want to create or
attract, several things happen. Your mind is a very powerful goal
seeking mechanism. You just have to give it a goal, and it gets busy
figuring out how to get it. When you focus on something, your mind
takes it as an instruction to figure out how to create or attract
whatever you've focused on. In fact, right now, you're already using
that power. The problem isn't a lack of ability to manifest what you
focus on, but rather a lack of conscious and intentional control
over what you focus on.

In other words, most people focus their mind unconsciously and
unintentionally. Their focus runs on autopilot. Your mind was pre-
set to focus in a certain way during childhood, and now it just runs
on automatic. Depending on what happened while you were growing up,
your mind focuses a certain amount of the time on what you want, and
a certain amount of the time on what you want to avoid. Either way,
though, it attracts or creates it.

Here's how it works. Now remember that this first principle works in
conjunction with the other two—taking action, and making sure the
action is of value to someone. So when you focus on something you
want to create or attract, a number of things happen. First, you get
ideas about what actions you could take. If you want to attract a
glass of lemonade, you think about having it, and your mind
immediately suggests that you to go to the kitchen, if you have some
lemonade there, or take a trip to the supermarket to buy some, if
you don't. Instantly, you get ideas about what action to take in
order to make your idea a reality.

Turning wishes into lemonade
You can probably see that sitting there visualizing lemonade without
doing something about it is a belief in magic, and if that's all you
do you're not going to get lemonade. Even if someone walks into the
room just as you think of lemonade, and you ask them to get you
some, you've still taken action. And, if by some coincidence you
thought of lemonade and right then someone walked into the room and
said, "I was wondering if you'd like some lemonade?" this is not
happening because you thought about lemonade. A lot of magic-
believers would like to think so, but you could sit there every day
and think about lemonade, and it would be a long time before that
method would work again.

Scientists have a name for this. It's called a coincidence. People
who believe in magic turn coincidences into evidence, but that
doesn't make it so, and you can easily prove this to yourself by
thinking of lemonade the next day, and the day after that, and the
day after that, and finding out what happens. What will happen is
that no lemonade will manifest the next day, or the next, or the
next, unless you get up out of your chair and take action to find
some.

How to find all the resources you need
So the first thing that happens when you focus on getting something
is that your mind generates ideas about how to get it, ideas about
what actions you could take to get it. The second thing that happens
is that you begin to notice resources you could use in getting what
you want. You might notice people who could help you that you
weren't noticing before. You might suddenly become aware of
information, books, seminars, TV shows, or whatever, that previously
you had not noticed.

Perhaps you've had the experience of wanting to learn about
something and going to a bookstore. Suddenly you see all kinds books
about the subject that you never noticed before, and would have just
walked right by if you hadn't told your mind to notice them.

Let's say you're driving down the street and you decide you want an
Italian meal. If there are any Italian restaurants on that street,
will you notice them? Of course. Would you have noticed them if you
hadn't focused your attention on Italian food? Probably not.

When you focus your attention on something, your mind develops a
kind of radar that causes resources to wave little red flags at you,
and to almost jump into your arms, or at least into your awareness.
But again, you can see how this relates to taking action, because
these resources you notice are useful only if you use them.

Okay, so far, by focusing on what you want, you've begun to develop
some ideas about how to get it, and you've started noticing
resources you could use. Next, focusing on what you want causes you
to become motivated to act. Because you're thinking about what you
want, and about how you'll feel when you get it—good, probably—you
become motivated to do something, to take action.

You can be a high-quality person
And, finally, focusing on what you want causes you to tap into or
develop certain internal qualities that help you to get it, such
things as courage, or persistence, or focus. Because you're focused
on what you want, and are thinking about the benefits of having what
you want and imagining how good it will feel, you're more likely to
be persistent, to focus your attention, to be disciplined, to be
self reliant, to take personal initiative, to use your imagination,
and to be enthusiastic.

Those who focus on what they want develop all of these personal
qualities, and, depending on what qualities are needed in order to
create what you want, possibly others. And, the more and the longer
you focus on what you want, and the more positive emotion you add,
the more these qualities become part of your personality.

So focusing your mind in the way described in The Secret causes you
to have ideas, to notice people and resources that could help you,
to become motivated to act, and to develop internal qualities that
will help you act to get what you want. You can see, then, how
incredibly valuable focusing your attention on what you want can be.
If you've ever wondered why some people seem to have so many ideas,
how they seem to always find the resources they need or the people
who can help them, how they stay motivated, and how they seem to
have all these amazing personal qualities, now you know. They did it
by continually focusing their attention on what they want and then
taking valuable action.

Ask the Magic Question
Now here's a really easy way to focus your attention on what you
want. I call it the Magic Question, but again, it really isn't
magic. To focus your attention on something you want to create or
attract, ask yourself, "How can I create X?" whatever X is, or "How
can I get X?" Sometimes, if you're in what seems to be a
particularly bad situation, you might say, "Given that I'm in this
situation, what can I do to get X?" For instance, if you just lost
your job and you have a lot of debts, you might ask yourself, "Okay,
given that I'm in this situation, what can I do right now to create
a new job and create enough money to pay all these debts?"

When you ask this type of How Can I? question, it focuses your
attention on what you want, and in doing so you enlist your mind in
finding an answer—in other words, to figure out what you could
actually DO to begin creating or attracting what you want.

Then, as you get ideas, you have to act on them. Sitting there
wishing and hoping for a miracle, or hoping that a coincidence will
slam into you is what NOT to do. Dr. Phil, if he were here, would be
asking such a person, "How's that workin' for ya?" I know a lot of
very successful people, including nearly every teacher who appears
in The Secret, and believe me, none of them sit around waiting for a
miracle to land on them.

Even the few of them who actually, and in my opinion mistakenly,
teach that focusing on what you want is magic, when you watch what
they're actually doing, they are taking action. How they can miss
the fact that they are is beyond me, but a few of them—who shall
remain nameless—do teach people to just "put it out to the universe"
and that no action is necessary. They too, though, take action, but
I guess they somehow fail to see the connection between the action
they take and the results they get.

If you look around at successful, make-it-happen people, you won't
see any of them who don't take action.

It only looks like they're not taking action
Now I'll admit that sometimes the results can look as if they are
coming to a very successful person awfully darned easy and awfully
darned quickly, but these results are still coming from action,
preceded by focusing on what that person wanted.

My friend Gay Hendricks, along with his wife Katie, have been
bestselling authors of books about relationships for over twenty
years. Another friend, Jack Canfield, is also a bestselling author.
Either one of them can pick up the phone, call a book publisher,
tell them an idea for a book, and get a book deal instantly. If some
other person wanted a book deal, it could take them years to make it
happen. If their idea didn't have value, based on what the publisher
wanted, they might never make it happen.

To someone who did not understand the principle of taking action and
the principle of creating value, it might look like Gay or Jack made
something happen as if by magic, without taking action. However, in
this case the book deal happened quickly because of actions they'd
previously taken. In fact, Jack visited scores of publishers with
the original Chicken Soup for the Soul book, and was almost ready to
give up, when he finally found a publisher willing to print his
book. But now, after selling well over 100 million books, he's
already proven that he can create a bestselling book. He's already
taken the action necessary to get a book publisher to send him a
contract and a check. The same goes for Gay Hendricks.

I can create a new course or a new product, and Centerpointe program
participants will buy it tomorrow, in droves. This isn't magic,
though. It's the residual of thousands of actions I've already taken
which have convinced my customers that when I create something, it's
going to be worth it for them to buy it in order to get the
benefits. I've already taken the required action, and sometimes that
makes it look as if little or no action is being taken in order to
get a certain outcome.

Will the Wish Fairy give you a raise?
Let's take this down to a more mundane example. If you work in an
office, and your boss approaches you and offers you a better job in
the company, with more pay, why does he do this? Is it magic? Is it
because you've been sitting in your cubicle putting it out to the
universe that you want a better job with more money? I doubt it. If
your boss offers you such a promotion, I'll bet you anything it's
because of past actions you've taken that have convinced your boss
that you're worth the raise, and because he's pretty sure that your
future actions will make it worth his while to give you new
responsibilities and more money.

Now, let's look at the third principle, the idea that the action you
take has to benefit someone, that your action has to create value.

Think of it this way. From time to time you give money to other
people, right? You pay your electric bill, you pay your car payment,
you give money to the supermarket, you give money to the clothing
store, or the gas station. Why do you do this? Is it just because
you like these people? Is it because they put it out to the universe
that you would stop by and give them money?

Well, you might like them, and they probably did sit down and focus
on how to get you and other customers to give them some of your
money, but when it comes right down to it, you gave them money
because they have something you want more than you want the money.
Like everyone else, unless it's just because you love them, you give
money to others if you get something valuable in return. What's
more, you're the sole judge of whether what they have is valuable.
It doesn't matter who else thinks it's valuable—if you don't think
it is, you don't give up your money for it.

The ONLY reason people will give you money
Other than money you might give to someone just because you love
them, this is the only reason why money changes hands. This means
that if you want money, someone else is going to have to give it to
you, and they're going to use the same criteria you use. If giving
you money gets them something they want more than the money, they'll
give you the money. In order to get more money, then, you have to
figure out a way to create more benefit, more value. This is really
the essence of the Law of Attraction. The amount of money you
attract is equal to the value you provide.

This applies to more than money, of course. As the Beatles said in
one of their songs, "the love you take is equal to the love you
make." I'm only talking in terms of money because that's what most
people think of when they think of The Secret and the Law of
Attraction. But whatever you want—love, respect, friends, or
anything else—you'll receive it to the extent that you put out,
through your actions, something of equivalent value. Be a good
friend, and you'll have friends. Act in a way that invites respect,
and you'll be respected. And so on.

The main point, though, is that for you to get something in this
world, you have to give. As Emerson said, the universe's books are
always balanced—which, by the way, also means that you can't fail to
receive when you give, and if you have to wait, you build up
interest, you might say, while you wait.

Now, some people struggle, at least partially, because they haven't
found a way to offer very much value, so they don't make much money.
If you're flipping burgers, it's probably because you don't have the
skills that make you more valuable to someone else, which means
others aren't willing to trade very much money for whatever you
provide. The burger-flipper needs to be reliable enough to show up,
smart enough to follow directions, and be able to get along with the
other employees, but not much else is required.

It's also possible that you have something that would be of value to
others, but you haven't found a way to let others know about it. In
that case, you have a sales and marketing problem, and you need to
find a way to convincingly let others know about the value you could
provide for them.

The more valuable you are, the more money you make
But there's a solution to this, and it isn't wishing and hoping. If
you don't have a way to create very much value for others, you can
always get more knowledge or more skills. I have people who work for
me who know how to take orders over the phone and enter them into
the computer, and they do it well. However, a lot of people can do
such a job, so it isn't a very lucrative job compared, for instance,
to someone who knows how to manage people, or who knows how to run a
computer network, or who knows how to create an advertisement that
creates a lot of sales. Such people end up getting more money
because they provide more value. And, they can provide more value
because they've paid the price to have those skills and that
knowledge.

Re: Two Parts of The Secret No One Talks About — and Why The Secret Won't Work Without Them Quote

So if you aren't making as much money as you want, you need to
figure out a way to create more value, and you need to figure out a
way to make sure people know you have this value. The value could be
your ideas, it could be your labor, it could be a product you create
or sell, or it could be a service you provide. If it has value, and
if you can find a way to make sure people know about it, you'll make
money equivalent to the value you provide. And, of course, none of
this will happen unless you take action, and you won't take action—
or know what action to take—unless you begin by focusing your mind
on what you want and asking yourself how you can get it.

But please don't think that you can just wish for something or "put
it out to the universe," and then, without taking action or
providing any value, expect to get it. In fact, let me clue you into
another aspect of the Law of Attraction. If a random event brings
you something, for which you haven't provided value—something you
haven't paid the price to have—I hate to tell you this, but you
still have to pay in some way.

If you win the lottery, you've received a bunch of money without
having provided value in exchange. You know what happens to nearly
all people who win millions in the lottery, don't you? That's right.
They almost always lose all the money within a few years. Unless
that person does something with the money that provides value to
others, they'll find a way to lose it.

And, by the way, this is the way debt works, too. If you go into
debt in order to have something before you've earned the money, you
end up paying more for it. There is a price for everything, and when
you pay in advance the price is lower, and when you pay in arrears
the price is higher. One of the big secrets to success is to find
out what the price is for what you want and pay it, in full, as fast
as possible. The price might be money, but it also could be time,
experience, learning, work, or something else. Sometimes the price
is a series of events that look like failures, but are really
preparation for success. But whatever the price is, the faster you
pay it, the better. This is what the second two principles are about.

Who wants $100,000?
Okay, let's take an example to see how you could use these three
principles to get what you want. Let's say that you do want more
money, and you realize right away that you don't yet have a way to
provide additional value to others, which is what would qualify you
to receive more money. For that reason, no one is giving you money.
What do you do? The first thing to do is to use the first principle,
the principle of focusing your attention on what you want. "I want
more money," you say. You ask yourself, "How can I get more money?"
Notice that I'm using that "How can I?" question again. It's always
a great question to ask because it focuses you on what you want.

It would be even better, though, if you were more specific. I might
say, then, "I want to make $100,000 a year. How can I do that?" Or,
I might say to myself, "Okay, how can I make $100,000 a year? Many
other people do it, so I know it's doable. How could I do it?" I
would keep asking myself this question, and I would focus my
attention on discovering a way to do it. Knowing the other two
principles, I'd know that when I get an idea, I'm going to have to
take action, and the action will have to benefit someone, so I'm
keeping that in the back of my mind.

So, what happens? First, you start getting ideas. Right now, off the
top of my head, I'm just going to share with you the ideas that come
to me, as if I was the person wanting to make $100,000 a year. The
first idea that comes to me is to see if I can find out who else is
making $100,000 a year. What professions make that much? Well,
certainly a lot of people who have their own business make that
much. A guy who owns a McDonald's makes more than that much for each
store he owns. Someone who owns a couple of dry cleaning stores
probably makes that much. I could probably go online and find
through Google a whole list of types of jobs that make $100,000 a
year.

People who sell certain products online, or through the mail,
probably make that much. Certain professional speakers, or authors,
make that much. Someone who sells real estate can make that much, or
more, and so can insurance agents. So one idea that came to me was
to check out who's actually making this kind of money, because that
might give me ideas for how I could do it. By finding this out, I
could at least save myself from doing something that I think will
make me a lot of money when in actual fact few if any people
actually make that kind of money doing it.

For instance, I see a lot of people in certain MLM-type businesses,
but rarely do I see anyone who even makes $1000 a month, let alone
significant money. I'm not trying to bash MLMs in general, because
some of them are great, and I'm not saying it isn't possible to make
good money in MLM, but if you're looking for a way to make a lot of
money, wouldn't it make sense to avoid something where nearly
everyone who does it fails?

If you want to start a business, do a little checking before you act
and find out what other people in that business are making.

Daydreaming, or acting?
Here's something else to keep in mind. If you sit around and focus
your attention on something you want, but you're daydreaming, you
aren't going to get it. Why? Because daydreaming is a kind of
thinking that already has lack of action built into it. There's a
huge difference between thinking about something when you're in
wishing mode, and thinking about the same thing when you're in
acting mode. If you want to create something, always do your
thinking while in acting mode.

But let's get back to creating that $100,000 a year. I've already
mentioned that focusing on how to do this gives you ideas. But it
also causes you to notice resources you might use. You might, for
instance, notice books about how to make more money. Or you might
notice that someone has a seminar about how to make more money.

It occurs to me as I'm thinking about this right now that my friend
Harv Eker, for instance, has a great seminar, and a book, about
making money. If you Google "Harv Eker", you'll see all kinds of
offerings he has. I know they're good, and if you follow his advice
you'll learn how to make more money. Jack Canfield has some great
stuff, too, and his book, The Success Principles, is a very complete
guide to how people create what they want in the world. I have a
very powerful online course that will teach you, in-depth, exactly
how to create whatever you want, which I'll tell you more about
later.

There are almost unlimited resources available about how to make
money. You usually don't notice them because you haven't focused
your attention on finding them. Then, of course, when you find them,
you have to take action and use them. This is where most people fall
down. There's a price to pay to get what you want in this world, and
most people would rather not pay it.

Paying the price—and enjoying it
The people you see who are getting what they want in life are almost
always those who have figured out how to enjoy paying the price,
which of course makes it easy to pay. As I said earlier, this is the
essence of the Law of Attraction—the price is just whatever you need
to give in order to attract or create what you want. That's why just
sitting there hoping and wishing doesn't work. When you do that, the
only thing you're putting out is an intention, which, while it's a
good start, is of no value to anyone—unless you act on it.

The resources you begin to notice when you focus on what you want
might also include people who could help you. And when you begin to
spot such people, you have to keep in mind that if you want their
help you have to make it worth their while to help you. This might
mean paying them, but you could compensate them in many other ways.
You could make them a partner. You could give them a feeling of
being a good person who helps others. Or anything in between.

And, quite often, if people who have the ability to help you see
that what you have has real merit, some of them will help you just
to help you, because they understand the Law of Attraction and they
know if they help you it will come back to them in some other way.
Often the people who have really mastered the Law of Attraction have
so much, and they create what they want so effortlessly, that they
just want to give back by helping others.

It never hurts to ask
It never hurts to ask for help, even if you're not sure how to
compensate the other person. But always start with the willingness
to compensate them in some way, even if you don't yet know how. In
fact, if you aren't sure, you could begin by saying, "I'm not sure
how at this point to make it worth your while, but I sure could use
your help." Ask, and see what happens, and always be open to
compensating the other person in some way, even if you haven't yet
figured out what it might be. In fact, be eager to compensate them.

So, you focus on what you want, and you ask yourself questions such
as "How can I make $100,000 a year?" Because of that, you get ideas,
you notice resources, you attract or notice people who might be able
to help. Focusing on what you want and imagining how good it will
feel to get it causes you to feel motivated to act, and so you take
action. Then, after you act, notice what happened. Evaluate your
action. Your action was either successful or not, or something in
between. Whatever happens, you'll get feedback. If your action
worked, you might want to do more of it. If it didn't work, learn
whatever you can from it, and then take another action based on what
you learned. Keep acting, evaluating, and then acting again, until
you create or attract whatever it is you're trying to get.

Even if you have to refine your actions many times, you're still
benefiting because you're gaining wisdom. This is why successful
people are so successful. They've acted, and received feedback, and
acted again, and received more feedback, and have done this so many
times that they've become wise. They've become experts. So be
willing to pay the price to become an expert. All these little so-
called failures are really tuition in the school of life, and the
learning they bring is very valuable.

All the while you're doing this, of course, you're remaining focused
on where you want to go and what you want to create, and you've
already decided, in advance, that nothing is going to keep you from
getting there. If you slip up, if what you're doing isn't working,
if you fall on your face, you learn everything you can from what
happened, and continue to focus on how to get where you want to go.

This constant focus on the end result, along with taking action, and
always trying to think of how to create value for others, always,
eventually, gets you there. The only way you can fail is if you're
mistaken about the value of what you provide, or you quit before you
get there. You might change your approach for getting there a number
of times, based on what you learn, but you otherwise just keep
focusing your attention on what you want and acting to get it.

The Secret Shortcut
Now, would you like to know a huge shortcut to this process? I
thought so. It's easy. Find other people who are already
successfully doing what you want to do, or getting what you want to
get. Then, find out what they're doing, and copy them. Also, while
you're at it, find out how they're focusing their mind.

So far I've spoken about focusing your mind as if it was a pretty
simple "one-size-fits-all" thing to do, but there are actually a
number of important things to learn about how to focus your mind,
and I'll tell you a little bit more about that in a moment. For now,
just know that it's very beneficial to find out what the person
you're modeling believes about what they're doing, what they think
is important about it, how they decide what to pay attention to and
what to delete from their attention, and many other nuances about
how they focus their attention.

And, then, of course, you want to find out what actions they've
taken to create what you want to create. All of this you can copy,
which gives you a huge head start. Then, as you gain wisdom through
your own actions, you can add your own twist to what you learned
from them.

How do you find these people? First, just asking yourself that
question—"How do I find people who are successfully doing what I
want to do?" causes you to think of ways to find them. But just off
the top of my head, I can think of a few ways. Again, you can use
Google. You can find books they've written. Ask other people if they
know someone. You can look in the Yellow Pages. You can spot them in
the newspaper. Many people are selling information on doing many of
the typical things someone might want to know how to do, in the same
way Harv Eker is teaching people how to make money.

How to get what you don't want
Now, let's talk about the other side of the coin. What happens when
you focus on what you don't want? Actually, the process works the
same way, except you end up getting what you don't want instead of
what you do want. Whatever you focus on, you mind takes it as an
instruction to create or attract it. And, as I said earlier, your
mind is very good at creating or attracting whatever you focus on.
If you focus on not being poor, for instance, your mind will get
busy figuring out how you can be poor. If you focus on not being
anxious, you're mind will figure out how to make you feel anxious.
If you focus on not making a mistake, you'll make mistakes.

As if it wasn't bad enough that you create it, the other big penalty
for focusing on what you don't want is that you get to feel bad. All
bad feelings—anger, anxiety, fear, confusion, panic, depression,
annoyance, shame, guilt, hopelessness, or anything else—come from
focusing on what you don't want. This is the flip side of feeling
good when you focus on what you want, especially if you're taking
action, and that action has value.

When you focus on what you don't want, or what you're worried about,
or what you're afraid of, or what you want to avoid, you put your
mind to work creating it, and you feel bad. Both of these penalties
obviously make focusing on what you don't want a bad idea. In fact,
focusing on what you don't want is poison to your life.

But how does focusing on what you don't want affect the second
principle, taking action? When you focus on what you don't want, one
of two things happens. You might, as a result, not take any action,
which is a kind of action, with its own results (or lack of
results). If you're afraid of making a mistake, you might avoid
acting, and the very failure to act is, in and of itself, a type of
mistake. When you don't act, you always know what will happen.
Nothing.

Or, you might, ironically, take an action, driven by your fear, that
creates the very thing you don't want. Not wanting to make a
mistake, you act in a way that creates mistakes. Not wanting to make
a bad investment, you figure out a way to become attracted to bad or
risky investments, or you fail to learn what you need to know to
make an good decision. Not wanting your business to fail, you are
led to take the very actions that do make it fail.

I see this all the time among my students. They focus on avoiding
something they're afraid of or worried about, and (almost) as if by
magic, they create it. The mind is ingenious in creating what you
focus on, and it doesn't care whether it's what you want or what you
don't want.

For this reason, it's crucial that you focus your mind consciously
and intentionally. Your mind is always focusing on something. As I
said earlier, it isn't that you can't manifest what you focus on,
it's that you're very likely choosing what to focus on
automatically, unconsciously. What you focus on is very often driven
by past events, childhood decisions and traumas, that cause you to
focus on what you don't want at least some of the time.

Attracting danger
Here's how it works. When you are traumatized during childhood (and
the trauma can be quite unintentional), you develop a belief that
the world is a dangerous place, or at least a potentially dangerous
place. In order to avoid this danger, you have to watch out for it.
To do that you have to focus your attention on it, and there you
are, giving your mind an instruction to create or attract the very
thing you don't want.

So The Secret is a wonderful thing. It works—especially if you add
the second and third principles I've shared with you. But it's like
electricity. You can light up a city with it, or electrocute
yourself. You can only use The Secret to get what you want to the
extent that you can consciously and intentionally direct your
attention. As long what you focus on is chosen without conscious
intention, you're going to find yourself attracting and creating, at
least some of the time, some things you don't want.

And some people are unfortunately attracting a lot of what they
don't want, a lot of the time.

But it doesn't have to be this way. You can develop the awareness
and the ability to use it to intentionally direct your focus. You
can turn off the autopilot. This is why Holosync is so powerful,
because it increases your ability to be aware, to live consciously
rather than automatically. As your awareness grows, you clearly see
how your focus creates what happens in your life, and as you watch
this happen it becomes more and more difficult to focus on what you
don't want, and much easier to focus on what you do want.

It's not an accident that so few people are truly successful.
Success, in whatever way you define it, flows directly from focusing
on what you want, and then, as a result, taking action that is of
value to the world. If you can't focus intentionally, though, this
process becomes very difficult.

You can't focus on what you've deleted
It also becomes easier to implement The Secret in your life if you
better understand the focusing process. In this discussion I've
treated focusing as a simple process, but it's actually a complex
cognitive process. There are many steps, and they whiz by very
quickly, mostly outside your awareness. For instance, you have
dozens of mental filters that delete much of what comes in through
your senses, then distorts (sometimes in a positive way, and
sometimes in a negative way) what is left.

Why does this matter? Well, you can't focus on what has been deleted
from your awareness. What if, for instance, you delete some—or even
all—of the possibilities? Many people do this. When they look
around, there are no possibilities! I correspond with people
everyday who tell me that they see no possibilities, yet the same
possibilities are actually available to them, as to anyone else. But
because they've filtered them out, they aren't there.

And this is just one of twenty-some filters people unconsciously use
before they ever get to the part of the process where they focus on
something.

People filter out possibilities, solutions, ideas, resources, ideas,
kindnesses, love, what they could be grateful for, and all kinds of
things. Many people filter things in such a way that all they see
are problems and what is wrong. They have nothing left to focus on
but what they don't want! Can you see how it would be valuable if
you could consciously choose how to use these filters?

We unfortunately don't have room here to go through the entire
process by which you focus your mind. However, even if you know
nothing about this, other than to focus as much as possible on what
you want—and you're willing to take action and to do whatever you
can to make sure your actions are of value to others—you'll get
results that are head and shoulders above those achieved by other
people.

However, I invite you to consider the possibility that you could
master this internal focusing process, by taking my online course,
The Internal Map of Reality Expander. Those who master this process
tap into a power that allows them to do or achieve anything they put
their mind to. There's no reason why you couldn't be one of them.

You can find out more, and listen to a free preview lesson, by going
to www.centerpointe.com/life/preview.

I also invite you, if you aren't already doing so, to use Holosync
audio technology to increase your conscious awareness (and to get
all the other mental, emotional, and spiritual benefits it brings).
You can get a free Holosync demo CD and a free Special Report at
www.centerpointe.com.

The Secret isn't a secret, and the Wish Fairy is a fraud
The Secret really isn't a secret. It's been around for thousands of
years, and many people have taught it in many different forms. The
only reason it can be referred to as a "secret" is that very few
people actually use it. It's been estimated that about 2% of people
actually embrace the three principles I've described and commit
themselves to using them consistently. Or, if they try to use the
first principle, they skip the second two and insist on wishing and
hoping and believing in magic, eternally waiting for the Wish Fairy
to give them what they want.

I'm hoping that you'll be one of those who embrace these principles
and actually use them. And I am here, along with my staff, to help
you use the tools we've created to become happy, peaceful, and
successful, and to create whatever you want in life.

Be well.

Bill

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

The MSM Miracle

MSM is an abbreviation of methylsulfonylmethane, an organic form of sulfur. The chemical formula of MSM® is CH3SO2CH3. It is the form in which sulfur appears in nature in all living organisms, and in which it is biologically active. MSM is an odorless, white, crystalline powder that is highly soluble in hot water and in a wide range of organic solvents (1). Biologically active sulfur has unbelievable preventive and therapeutic properties. The medicinal activities of biological sulfur are so all-encompassing, and are based on such obvious principles, that its discovery is generally considered one of the biggest advances in orthomolecular medicine in the second half of this century.


THE DISCOVERY OF MSM

About forty years ago, Dr. Stanley Jacob and Dr. Robert Herschler, chemists with the pulp and paper plant Crown Zellerbach Corporation, were asked to find a use for lignin, one of the primary waste products of the plant. Oxidation of lignin in a reactor was shown to result in the formation of DMSO (Dimethylsulfoxide), a natural, organic form of sulfur. This water soluble compound has a strong and bitter taste, and is absorbed rapidly through the skin. Workers coming in contact with the DMSO-containing wastewater, noticed their perspiration began smelling like DMSO, and they tasted its bitterness in their mouths. Moreover, the water appeared to have special medicinal qualities. Many stories about miraculous recoveries and benefits still go around, but they can not be authenticated. Certain is, however, that cuts, scrapes, burns and sprains recovered more quickly when dipped in this water. Several workers also noticed that conditions caused by arthritis and asthma improved when they came in contact with the DMSO-containing water (George Bergstrom, personal information).

Following its original discovery, several thousand articles and publications have appeared in the United States discussing the medicinal properties of DMSO. Because of its bitter taste and penetrating odor, DMSO never became very popular with the general public. Another problem with DMSO was that it sometimes caused skin irritation when applied topically. For these reasons researchers began looking for a more user-friendly derivative of DMSO. Oxidation of DMSO was found to produce MSM, a much more stable, organic sulfur compound with medicinal properties at least equal to DMSO, but without the odor and skin irritation complications (4, 8, 9).


NATURAL SOURCES OF MSM

MSM is the natural form in which sulfur is found in the earth's sulfur cycle (3). Algae and several forms of plankton in oceans are capable of absorbing massive amounts of inorganic sulfur from seawater, and to convert this into a simple, organically-bound form. When these algae and planktonic organisms die, enzymatic processes result in the breakdown of the organic molecules into DMS, or Dimethylsulfide. This compound is volatile and poorly soluble in water. It collects in the stratosphere, where it is oxidized under the influence of ultraviolet light into DMSO (Dimethylsulfoxide), and further converted into MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane). DMSO and MSM are highly soluble in water, and therefore concentrate easily in atmospheric water vapor, returning to earth in the form of rain. Plant roots rapidly collect and concentrate these sulfur sources. Laboratory research has shown, that a one ppm mixture of radioactive labeled DMSO and MSM, can concentrate hundred fold in plant roots within hours (4).

Rainwater in particular therefore contains a lot of MSM. It is also abundantly found in fresh fruit and vegetables in amounts generally ranging from 1 to 4 mg/kg (3). Raw milk from cows which graze in pastures contains 2 to 5 mg/kg MSM. Due to the volatile nature of MSM, it is rapidly lost due to heating during the preparation of food. It is also lost when vegetables and fruit are left for a period of time, heated or not. Pasturized milk therefore contains less than 0.25 mg/kg MSM, roughly the same amount as found in milk from cows fed dried, artificial food (3). Due to our present day's dietary patterns, it is unavoidable that modern man suffers from a chronic shortage of MSM.



MSM AND HUMAN HEALTH

The natural level of MSM in the circulatory system of an adult human male is about 0.2 mg/kg. Normal adults excrete 4 to 11 mg MSM per day in their urine. Several studies suggest, that the systemic concentration of MSM drops in mammals with increasing age, possibly as a result of changing diet or body metabolism. Some research suggests, that there is a minimum concentration of MSM that must be maintained in the body to preserve the normal function and structure (8, 9). Low concentrations of MSM in our bodies have been linked with unspecified complaints of fatigue, depression, high sensitivity to physical and psychological stress, and with a large number of degenerative diseases (5, 6). MSM is an important source of sulfur, but also has unique properties related to its chemical structure and biological activities. To understand the preventive and therapeutic properties of MSM, a distinction needs to be made between "why humans need sulfur" vs. "why humans need MSM".


WHY DOES THE HUMAN BODY NEED SULFUR?

Following calcium and phosphorus, sulfur is the third most abundant mineral in the body. A grown person contains approximately 140 grams of sulfur (6). Nearly half of all sulfur is contained in muscular tissue, skin and bones (5).

Protein Structure

When plants absorb MSM from rain water, they convert it into the sulfur containing amino acids methionine and cysteine. Taurine and cystine, the other two known sulfur amino acids, are synthesized from cysteine. The body manufactures about 80% of the amino acids it needs, and these are classified as nonessential. The remaining 20%, called essential amino acids, must be obtained from food. Methionine and cysteine are considered two of them. There are approximately 28 known amino acids. Each type of protein is made up of a unique collection of amino acids in a specific combination. Two molecules cysteine can oxidize and bond together through sulfur (-S-S-) bonds (5). These sulfur bonds are the key factors that hold proteins in shape, and determine the form properties and biological activity of proteins.

Connective Tissue

Nails and hair primary consist of a tough protein with a high sulfur content, called keratin. Flexible tissues like connective tissue and cartilage, contain proteins with flexible sulfur bonds. Collagen is the most abundant protein in the body, and a major component of all connective tissue. In skin, collagen works with fibers of another protein called elastin, to give skin its elasticity. In cartilage, the sulfur containing proteoglycans glucosamine and chondroitin form with collagen a fibrous protein substance that give cartilage its structure and flexibility (5, 6).

The importance of the connective tissue for the body goes beyond simply keeping cells together. The first biophysical regulatory model was developed by Prof. Dr. Pischinger which he termed the "Vegetative Building Structure." This theory was further developed by Prof. Dr. Heine who described proteoglycans and glycosamines, and by Dr. Popp, a biophysicist, who showed the importance of electromagnetic fields in bio-information. Their research has demonstrated that the soft, connective tissue, the extracellular matrix which surrounds cells, serves more purposes that structural and connective. It also is important in the transport of nutrients, electrolytes, signal compounds and atomic and subatomic particles. Thus, the soft connective tissue forms an essential communication network within the body through the transfer of fine matter bio-information (13 -16).

As many people notice later in life, the flexible tissues lose their elastic properties. A shortage of sulfur is the likely cause of this problem. The consequences are stiffening of muscles and joints, rippling of the skin, and decreased elasticity of lung tissues and arterial blood vessels. Without a doubt, the transfer of bio-information through soft connective tissue deceases also, and the occurrences of diseases at advanced age may well be caused by a decrease in communication between cells and body tissues.

Cell Membrane Permeability

All cells (and all organelles within cells) are surrounded by membranes. A membrane consists of two layers of molecules situated opposite of one another and consisting of an essential fatty acid on one end, and a sulfur containing amino acid on the other end. The amino acids are interconnected in such a manner that they form a surface into which the proteins and other membrane constituents are inserted and secured. These proteins are necessary for the transport through the cell membrane of many types of nutrients and waste materials.

Sulfur bridges form flexible connections between the cells and the surrounding connective tissues. This allows the cells to retain their elasticity. When sulfur is in short supply, the cell wall hardens, and the cells lose their elasticity. The transport proteins of the membrane become locked, and the membranes become less permeable. This results in a reduced transport of oxygen and nutrients into, and excretion of waste products from the cells. This causes a shortage of oxygen and nutrients, and an accumulation of toxic metabolic waste products inside the cells. Reduced vitality and eventually degenerative diseases are the result.

Recent insight in free radical pathology has shown that the thiol (-SH) groups of sulfur containing amino acids can protect cell membrane protein chains from oxidation. But that is not all. Studies by Dr. Johanna Budwig have demonstrated that sulfur containing amino acids in cell membranes resonate with the double connections of the fatty acids, resulting in the release of electrons. Electron clouds are formed, which can move along the fatty acid chains. In this manner, electrical currents evolve which form the basis of all electrical energy in the body. This energy can be measured in heartbeat, nerve stimulations, muscle contractions, in short, in all chemical and electrical reactions which make life possible.

Metabolism

Enzymes are proteins which control all-important life functions. For example, they regulated all metabolic processes in our bodies. Sulfur bridges are responsible for the spatial structure of enzymes. Without sulfur bridges, enzymes would lack biological activity due to deviations in their spatial structure. Shortages in sulfur cause reduced production of biologically active enzymes, which result in a reduction of many metabolic processes. Sulfur is important for the cellular energy production in which glucose is metabolized under the release of energy.

Most important, sulfur plays a role in the electron transport system, as part of iron/sulfur proteins in mitochondria, the energy factories of the cell. Furthermore, sulfur participates in the vitamin-B Thiamine (B1) en Biotin. These vitamins are essential for converting carbohydrates into energy, by burning glucose. Insulin is a hormone excreted by the pancreas which mainly functions to regulate the blood sugar level. Insulin therefore plays an important role in the carbohydrate metabolism. Each insulin molecule consists of two amino acid chains, connected to one another by sulfur bridges (Figure 4). These sulfur bridges are very important for the proper functioning of insulin. Without these bridges, the hormone loses its biological activity.



WHY DOES THE HUMAN BODY NEED MSM?

Preferred Dietary Source of Sulfur

It is generally believed that in humans, the sulfur-containing amino acids methionine and cysteine are the most important sources of sulfur. However, since the discovery of the earth's sulfur cycle, this theory is increasingly brought into question (3). Several hundred million years ago, algae in the oceans started producing simple organic sulfur compounds, which led to the formation of MSM. This biologically active sulfur was probably the most important source of sulfur for all subsequently developing life forms. This gives food for thought that the higher forms of life most likely are genetically preprogrammed to use MSM as source of sulfur. This theory is further enhanced by the discovery that MSM can be ingested by all organisms investigated so far in almost unlimited quantities without causing any toxic effects. The same cannot be said about the sulfur containing amino acids methionine en cysteine, which can be consumed in small quantities, but at larger doses cause undesired toxic symptoms (3).
Experiments using MSM containing radiolabeled sulfur (35S) have shown, that following ingestion, MSM releases its sulfur to form collagen and keratin, basic ingredients of hair and nails, as well as the essential amino acids methionine and cysteine, and serum proteins (8, 11). It appears abundantly clear that the importance of MSM as source of sulfur has been grossly underestimated. The reason for this underestimation is most easily explained by the way food is processed in our western society, which causes the loss of the majority of the naturally present MSM. It is therefore for good reason that MSM is referred to as "The Forgotten Nutrient" (6).

Protection of the Mucosa

Additional experiments with MSM containing radiolabeled sulfur demonstrated that after ingestion, MSM is bound to the mucosa. Apparently, MSM is binding to receptor sites at the mucous membrane surface in the intestinal and urogenital tracts and the respiratory system. By doing so, it presents a blocking interface between host and environment (4). There are many health-benefitting implications to such natural interactions. Allergens and parasites cannot bind to the mucosa, toxins are oxidized and free radicals are eliminated.



WHAT CAN MSM DO FOR YOU?

Deficiencies in biological sulfur can result in less optimal functioning of each cell, tissue and organ in the body. Inorganic sulfur is poorly assimilated. Organic, biologically active sulfur is therefore extremely important for the health of every living organism. MSM is the natural source of biological sulfur. Use of MSM has the following benefits:

Chronic Pain

Perhaps the most remarkable discovery regarding MSM is, that MSM is an effective pain killer which works with many types of chronic pain. In March 1999 a remarkable book was published: “The Miracle of MSM: The Natural Solution for Pain”. This book is based on the experience of two medical doctors who have worked with MSM. The authors are: Stanley W. Jacob, M.D., Head of the DMSO Pain Clinic in Portland, OR, and Professor at the Oregon Health Sciences University; and Ronald M. Lawrence, M.D., Ph.D., Founder of the International Association for the Study of Pain, and the American Association for the Study of Headaches. Both doctors discuss their extensive experience with MSM in this book. Combined, they have over 20 years of experience with fighting pain with MSM. They conclude that of more than 18,000 patients that suffer from chronic pain, about 70% have experienced benefits from the use of MSM, i.e., the pain either diminished or disappeared altogether.

The types of pain which has been treated successfully with MSM include:

Personal injury due to accidents, burns, etc.
Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis
Fibromyalgia
Lower back pains
Headaches, migraines
Muscle aches
Bursitis
Tennis elbows and other local sprots injuries
Carpal Syndrome
Sclerosis;
Whiplash
RSI (Repititive Strain Injury);
Scars due to burns, operations, accidents, etc.
The way MSM impacts pain is currently explained by the following mechanisms:
MSM is a natural analgetic: it blocks the transfer of pain impulses through nerve fibers (C-fibers).
MSM blocks inflammations and inflammatory processes. MSM enhances the activity of cortisol, a natural anti-inflammatory hormone produced by the body.
MSM improves the permeability of cell membranes. This improves the uptake of nutrients and many vitamins and the elimination of waste products and excess cellular fluids.
MSM dilates bloood vessels, enhancing the blood circulation. This, too, helps to eliminate waste products from the body, which speeds up healing.
MSM is a muscle relaxant. This is an important and often overlooked benefit of MSM. Many chronic pains are aggrevated by chronic muscle tension in the body.
MSM aids the natural defense mechanisms in the body by regulating the prostaglandin metabolism, and regulates the formation of anitbodies and immune complexes.
MSM slows down and restores crosslinking in collagen. Crosslinking in collagen is a natural process in scar formation, causing hard and often painful scar tissues. Particularly in the case of burn scars, in which large surface areas may be affected, this may lead to chronic pain. MSM heals scar tissue which makes the skin more flexible. Dramatic examples are known of people who have treated burn scars with a MSM ointment and have seen their scars almost disappear and have eliminated associated pains.

Synergetic Effect

MSM is considered a potentiator of most vitamins and other nutrients, such as vitamin C, Coenzyme Q10, all B- vitamins, vitamin A, D en E, amino acids, selenium, calcium, magnesium en many others. MSM improves the cellular uptake of these nutrients, and prolongs their lives (5, 6, 8). The body can better utilize the nutrients, and taking dietary supplements is more efficient. Additionally, fewer dietary supplements need to be taken.

Antioxidant

MSM is a strong antioxidant, capable of binding and inactivating free radicals. Free radicals are unstable molecules and atoms with unpaired electrons, which, by force of nature, attract electrons from their surrounding environment. Free radicals are not all harmful. Actually, life without free radicals is impossible. They are needed for te cellular energy production. The liver produces free radicals during the breakdown of harmful substances. And the body's immune system uses free radicals to kill viruses and bacteria. The body houses antioxidants which bind and deactivate free radicals. The normal productions of free radicals in a healthy human therefore are harmless. However, the overproduction of free radicals can be very harmful. They can begin a chain reaction which eventually can cause great harm to cell membranes and chromosomes. Overproduction of free radicals is caused by physical and mental stress, malnutrition, air pollution, heavy metals and organic contaminants in drinking water and food, radiation and cigarette smoke. In such cases the body needs extra antioxidants from our food. MSM is such an antioxidant.

As a major sulfur donor, MSM is essential for the proper functioning of the body's anti oxidation system. When neutralizing free radicals, the body uses a variety of antioxidant enzymes that contain sulfur amino acids, and derive their structure and biological activity from sulfur bonds (S-S). Besides, MSM provides the sulfur for the amino sulfur acids methionine, cysteine and taurine, that are considered powerful antioxidants. When split off, the thiol (-SH) groups of these amino acids are capable of neutralizing free radicals (17). Sulfur is also necessary for the formation of what is considered the most powerful nutritional antioxidant, glutathion (5). And as stated before, MSM potentiates the effect of well known nutritional antioxidants as the vitamins C and E, coenzyme Q10, selenium etc. (5, 7). MSM itself also appears to act as an antioxidant (7). The mucosa contains a carbon-sulfur bond cleaving enzyme, termed C-S lyase. Studies suggest that when bound to the mucosa, cleavage of MSM provides an electron deficient group CH3SO2 which can neutralize free radicals (4).

Detoxification

MSM is known to dissolve in many organic and inorganic compounds (1). Bound to the mucosa and split into an electron deficient group CH3SO2. , MSM reacts with toxins, affects inactivation and speeds excretion (4). Furthermore, MSM enhances the permeability of cell membranes, making it easier for nutrients to be taken up by the cells, and waste products to be eliminated. Practically speaking, MSM drastically increases the ability of cells to excrete toxic waste products. Many health practitioners working with MSM will state, that it is the most powerful detoxifying nutraceutical or pharmaceutical agent they have ever worked with.

A recent example shows the dramatic detoxification action of MSM. A young artist sought help in a psychiatric institution for severe mental complaints. Anti-depressives worsened his complaints to such degree that he decided to look for alternative care. Microscopic examination of his blood using the Life Blood / HLB test showed undeniably that the man suffered from several heavy metal and solvent poisoning caused by the paints which he used in his art work. This person subsequently sought the help of various traditional and alternative medical professionals who prescribed various pharmaceutical drugs, homeopathic and orthomolecular detoxifier as well as bioresonance therapy. After one and one half years of detoxification the blood picture had somewhat improved, but he still exhibited severe toxicity symptoms (Figure a).



Figure a Figure b

One and one half years later, his blood had improved somewhat but his basic complaints had remained unchanged. On the advice of the author, this man stopped taking the medications received so far, and was put on high dosages of MSM (15 grams/day), supported by weekly Ayurvedic sweat baths to stimulated waste discharge. Two months later his a microscopic examination showed that his blood had returned to normal (Figure b), and he indicated that, for the first time since seeking treatment, he had noticed a significant improvement in his condition.

Neurological Diseases

The brain is extremely sensitive to the effects of toxic materials such as heavy metals and organic compounds. Many of these compounds tend to accumulate in nerve cells where they can cause severe oxidative damage. Neurological disturbances such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, may be the result. MSM is one of the few antioxidants which can easily pass the blood-brain barrier. It prevents and repairs oxidative damage and restores cell membrane elasticity and permeability. This allows the nerve cells to start excreting waste products.

The powerful action of MSM is illustrated in the following example. An older woman suffered from poisoning caused by exposure to aluminum. This heavy metal had accumulated in her brains and caused severe neurological damage. The woman had been confined to her bed for six years, unable to communicate with her surroundings. All this time she had not spoken a word. Medical doctors could no longer help her and had given up on her. She was completely dependent on her husband who took complete care of her needs. A natural health care practitioner advised two teaspoons of MSM (about 15 grams) daily. The MSM passed the blood brain barrier, and restored the permeability of the brain cell membranes, following which her brain cells were allowed to purge the heavy metal poisons. Two weeks later, the orthomolecular physician prescribed a warm bath to her in which special substances had been added to help her eliminate the released poisons through the skin. After twenty minutes in this bath, the woman suddenly smiled and said "Gee, I feel much better now." These were the first words she had spoken in years. Several months later, the woman was capable of leading a normal life again (7).

Allergies

MSM alleviates the symptoms of a large number of allergies including food allergies, contact allergies, inhalation allergies, etc. The major anti-allergic property of MSM is probably caused by its ability to bind to the mucosa and present a natural blocking interface between hosts and allergens. Besides, MSM alleviates allergies through detoxification and elimination of free radicals, and improvement of cell permeability. A direct correlation between concentration of MSM used and resistance to allergens has been established. Several authors have noted that MSM works as a histamine inhibitor at least as well as the traditional antihistamines, without the negative side effects (5, 6, 7).

Autoimmune Diseases

MSM very effectively fights inflammations resulting from autoimmune reactions (in which the body's immune system turns onto itself). For example, people who suffer from arthritis often benefit greatly from MSM. Several studies have shown, that supplementation of MSM, significantly reduced joint degeneration and inflammation. In one study, 24 people with symptomatic osteoarthritis were treated with either a regular (NSAID) drug, or with 3 grams of MSM daily. After one month, both groups noted equal improvements in pain and stiffness( 6). In another experiment, a special strain of mice was studied that is prone to the spontaneous development of rheumatoid arthritis-like joint lesions.

Researchers have found that two-month old mice who were given water containing a 3% solution of MSM for a period of three months suffered no degeneration of articular cartilage. In the control group of mice receiving only tap water, 50% of the animals were found to have focal degeneration of articular cartilage. Nearly all (95%) control animals had inflammatory reaction in the synovial tissues, compared to less severe inflammatory reaction in 50% of the MSM group (8, 10). The beneficial effect of MSM is due in part to its ability to improve cell permeability, allowing harmful substances (lactic acid, toxins) to flow out while permitting nutrients to flow in, thereby preventing a pressure buildup in cells that causes inflammation in the joints (5).

Mice prone to the development of Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Disease (ALD) were fed a diet that included a 3% solution of MSM as drinking water from the age of one month. The mean life span of the control group was 5.5 months, whereas the mean life span of the MSM group was extended to more than 10 months of age. The MSM group showed decreased anti-nuclear antibody responses and significant diminution of lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly and anemia development, thus suggesting that MSM provided significant protection against the development of the autoimmune disease ALD (12). Other experiments were conducted on mice bred for their propensity to acquire the autoimmune disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

These experiments showed MSM to have a protective effect both before and after the onset of the disease. Mice which are maintained on a diet including 3% MSM in their drinking water from age one month, suffered lower death rates and liver damage than control groups drinking only tap water. After seven months 30% of the control group had died, while all the MSM mice were still alive. Also, when mice seven months old and already showing signs of advanced lupus were fed the MSM diet, 62% of the animals were still alive after nine months compared to 14% for the control group that received only tap water (8).

Cancer

Several experiments have shown, that oral administration of MSM can protect rats against the onset of cancer. In one study, rats specially bred to be susceptible to breast cancer when given certain carcinogenic compounds, were fed a diet containing MSM for a period of eight days. The control group did not receive MSM. Following this preliminary period, all rats were given oral doses of cancer-causing agents. There was no statistical difference in the number of tumors developing in the two groups. However, the MSM diet rats developed their first tumors some 100 days later than the control rats, and these tumors became cancerous some 130 days later than those in the control group. Considering a two-year average life expectancy of rats, 100 days are the equivalent of about ten years in human life (8).

In another research, rats received MSM as 1% solution in their drinking water throughout the time of the experiment. The control group received only tap water. One week after the start of the dietary regimen, all rats were injected with dimethylhydrazine, a chemical that induces colon cancer. Over the nine months that the experiment was conducted, the number of bowel tumors occurring in the rats was statistically the same for the two groups. However, the time of appearance of the first bowel tumors was considerably longer in the MSM treated rats. The researchers concluded, that MSM significantly lengthens the time of tumor onset compared to the controls (8).

Parasites

One of the most amazing discoveries on MSM is its anti-parasitic action against Giardia, Trichomonas, roundworms, nematodes, Enterobius and other intestinal worms (5). Animal studies include laboratory mice, determined to have pin worms (Enterobius) by fecal cast examination. They were given commercial food and drinking water, both containing 2% MSM by weight. After 17 days, fecal examination indicated the feces were free of worms and eggs. The blood level of MSM in one animal examined exceeded 30 ppm or mg/kg (3). Human studies include a man with confirmed Giardia lamblia, apparently contacted from contaminated water in a primitive area. He was given 500 mg MSM three times a day for 14 days. By the eighth day he was free of symptoms, and two stool specimens collected one week later were free of the organism (3). In another study, Trichomonas vaginalis was successfully treated by oral dosage of 1 gram MSM a day, and a daily topical application of 5% aqueous MSM for one week (3).

The major antiparasitic property of MSM is probably caused by its ability to bind to the mucosa and present a natural blocking interface between hosts and parasites. It's as though MSM puts down a coating on the mucosa, which parasites find impenetrable and can't cling to. Unable to stick, the parasites are simply flushed out of the body (5, 9). In vitro research has shown the antiparasitic, antifungal and antibacterial action of MSM concentrations. MSM concentrations of 1 mg/mL and less demonstrated no significant inhibition of Giardia lamblia. However, at 20 mg/mL concentrations it was strongly inhibitory, and concentrations above 40 mg/mL promptly killed the organism. According to Dr. Herschler, one can safely administer up to 1-2 gram MSM per kg body weight on a daily basis. One therefore builds a safely tolerated blood level up to 4000 ppm (mg/kg), which level is highly toxic to many infective organisms yet is harmless to the host (3).

A growing number of natural physicians are expressing concerns about parasites. It is becoming increasingly clear that they can be a continuous source of poisoning which can spread throughout the body and affect the immune system. It is an intriguing thought that MSM maybe nature's original means of protecting us against parasites.

Diabetes

The sulfur-containing B vitamin biotin is a critical part of glucokinase, the enzyme involved in the utilization of the sugar glucose. Sulfur is also a component of insulin, the protein hormone secreted by the pancreas that is essential to carbohydrate metabolism. Lack of nutritional sulfur in the diet can result in low production of biological active insulin. Studies indicate, that MSM improves cellular glucose uptake by improving cell permeability, thus balancing blood sugar level and returning the pancreas to normal functioning (5).

Muscle Soreness and Cramps

Especially in combination with vitamin C, MSM has demonstrated remarkable ability to reduce or eliminate the incidence of muscle soreness, leg and back cramps. MSM is particularly successful with geriatric patients who have such cramps during the night or after long periods of inactivity. Many people with stiff muscles and joints have reported a marked improvement after using MSM for some time. Several cases have been reported of people who suffer from carpal tunnel syndrome, who have been cured by using MSM. An elderly woman was slated to have an operation performed on both wrists. On the advice of the author she started using MSM. A month later her symptoms had all but disappeared, and the operation was no longer necessary.

Athletes who compete vigorously can learn from trainers of million-dollar racehorses. For many years and with great success, trainers administer MSM to their prize horses before a race to prevent muscle soreness, and afterwards to lessen the risk of cramping and improve physical recovery (4). The physical fatigue syndrome following intense athletic activity in competitive sports, which usually persist for 8-10 days in athletes, was gone in 2-3 days in individuals who had ingested 1-2 gram MSM per day for the preceding six months (3)

Constipation and Stomach Acidity

One study reveals, that at least 75% of individuals taking one or more antacids or H2 histamine receptor antagonists against stomach acidity, were able to sharply reduce or eliminate such medication within a week of initiating MSM as a dietary supplement. In another study, twenty-one subjects with a history of constipation were given 500 mg daily doses of MSM together with 1 gram of ascorbic acid. All subjects with abnormal colon function returned to normal and remained normal while MSM was part of their diet (5). These studies point out, that MSM often gives more relief from stomach acidity and constipation, than commonly prescribed medication. Many people have experienced, that one of the most exciting and rewarding benefits for those who begin taking MSM, has been the prompt and continuing relief from stomach acidity and constipation problems (7).

Lung Dysfunction

MSM allows the body to more effectively take up oxygen. In the first place, it improves the elasticity of the lung cells and the permeability of long cell membranes, allowing more air to be breathed and oxygen to pass through the membranes into the blood stream. Secondly, MSM prevents and corrects the clotting of red blood cells, allowing the blood to absorb more oxygen. Moreover, by improving the cell membrane permeability, cells throughout the body can take up more oxygen from the blood, and hence produce more energy. People suffering from lung dysfunctions may benefit greatly from treatment with MSM. In one study, seven human subjects with respiratory deficiency were given MSM in amounts ranging from 250 - 1.500 mg/day. Five had emphysema, and two had lung tumors with additional function impairment due to pleural fluid accumulation. Both were on radiation chemotherapy prior to including MSM in their diet, but without apparent benefit. Before and during the test period, the five subjects with emphysema were required to walk a measured distance compatible with their physical capabilities. Within four weeks of beginning the ingestion of MSM, all emphysema sufferers had at least doubled their 'comfortable' walking distance. The two subjects with lung tumors were assessed by attending physicians and nurses as more alert and with a better attitude than before the test. Most strikingly however, the lung fluid had disappeared during the first months of the test period (3).

Stress

Many people using MSM have reported to feel better and stronger, with increased endurance. During a test with 14 persons using MSM for periods from seven months to over one year, none of them became ill (3). One stress study involved two groups of 25 goldfish, which were removed from a large aquarium and placed in two identical, small aquariums. One group was fed ordinary goldfish food, and the other group received the same food with 2% by weight of MSM added. Movement confinement, temperature changes and marginal oxygenation stressed the fish in both aquariums equally. After five days, only one fish of the MSM group had died, against 11 (almost 50%) of the control group (3).

It is common practice in intensive cattle breeding to add antibiotics to animal feed to promote growth and prevent the outbreak of stress-related diseases. Animal products such as meat, milk and eggs contain residues of antibiotics, which are readily consumed. The abundant usage of antibiotics is largely responsible for the creation of resistent bacteria strains. Well known examples are the "hospital bacterium" MRSA (meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus), and the VRE's (vancomycin-resistant enterococci). Today, increasing resistance of bacteria is considered one of the major threats of human health. It is an intriguing thought that adding MSM to animal feed might reduce stress and improve animal health to a level where the usage of antibiotics can be strongly reduced.

Skin

Sulfur is called nature's "beauty mineral," because it keeps the skin smooth and youthful, and the hair glossy. Sulfur is necessary for production of collagen and keratin, protein necessary for health and maintenance of skin, nails and hair (6). Several experiments have shown, that all kinds of dermatological disorders which are often allergy-related, respond favorably to a diet supplemented by MSM. Oral dosages of MSM have shown to be effective against acne, Rosaceae and dry, scaly or itching skin(3). When used topically in the form of an ointment or lotion, MSM is helpful in treating skin disorders including acne, psoriasis, eczema, dermatitis, dandruff, scabies, diaper rash and certain fungal infections (1, 6). Scars resulting from operations and from burns also respond well to topical application. New scars can heal so perfectly, that they are almost invisible. Old scars, too, can improve markedly.

FOR WHOM IS MSM INTENDED?

MSM is intended for everyone who appreciates good health and intends to keep this as long as possible. Sport enthusiasts and athletes can use it to improve their performance and sped up recovery. People with degenerative diseases can use it to drastically improve their health.

MSM is no cure-all solving each and every health problem. It is a food supplement which people in ancient times probably received in sufficient degree. In our present time, this is demonstrably not the case. MSM assists the body to better cure itself and maintain its vitality. MSM cannot do this by itself. The basis for good health is maintaining healthy living conditions, in which one feels happy and takes good care of one's health. Such living conditions include:

Healthy food which, at a minimum, includes MSM, vitamin C and trace minerals and elements, as these are food ingredients which nearly everyone obtains insufficiently;
Loving relationships;
Sufficient sleep;
Sufficient sunlight and fresh air;
Periodic meditation or prayer;
Attainable life goals which fit one's essence;

DOSAGES AND USAGE
The optimal dosage depends on the nature and intensity of the complaints. In most cases, it is sufficient to take an initial dose of three 1-gram tablets twice daily (children ten and under take a tablet twice daily, older than ten, take two tablets twice daily). After several months this dosage can be reduced to two tablets twice daily. People with serious ailments have been shown to benefit from higher dosages, up to four 1-gram tablets three times daily. Such a high dosage may be advised to fight parasital infections. Case studies have been reported in which patients did not show noticeable improvement until they received a daily dosage of 30 grams (6). Such extreme dosage is not generally recommended for most people, although no negative effects were reported (3,6).

It is recommended to gradually increase the dosage from two tablets twice daily, and not to increase the dose as long as detoxification symptoms persist. Although uncommon, these symptoms may include nausea and headaches (see below). MSM is best taken with a glass of water one half hour prior to taking a meal. As it tends to stimulate one's energy level, it is generally advisable not to take it prior to retiring for the night.



HOW SAFE IS MSM?

MSM is considered to be one of the least toxic substances in biology, similar in toxicity to water. When MSM was administered to human volunteers, no toxic effects were observed at intake levels of 1 gram per kg of body weight per day for 30 days. Intravenous injections of 0.5 grams per kg body weight daily for five days a week produced no measurable toxicity in human subjects. The lethal dose (LD50) of MSM for mice is more than 20 g/kg body weight. MSM has been widely tested as a food ingredient without any reports of allergic reactions. An unpublished Oregon Health Sciences University study of the long-term toxicity of MSM over a period of six months, showed no toxic effects. More than 12,000 patients were treated with MSM at levels above two grams daily, without toxicity (8).


DETOXIFICATION SYMPTOMS

In practice, most people who use MSM notice very little at the onset, or may experience slight detoxification symptoms. These symptoms may include mild forms of diarrhea, skin rash, headache and fatigue. After one week, these symptoms usually disappear. Fewer than 20% of users of MSM may feel moderately sick in the first few days of using MSM. It may be small consolation to know, that the stronger the symptoms are, the more toxicants had been stored in the body and the more MSM was needed for its purification. If more moderate symptoms of detoxification are experienced, it may be advisable to reduce the dosage of MSM, and to gradually rebuild it once the symptoms disappear.


LITERATURE

Herschler, R.J.: Methylsulfonylmethane and Methods of Use. United States Patent 4,296,130: 1981.

Herschler, R.J.: Methylsulfonylmethane in Dietary Products. United States Patent 4,616,039: 1986.

Herschler, R.J.: Dietary Products and Uses Comprising Methylsulfonylmethane. United States Patent 4,863,748: 1989.

Herschler, R.J.: MSM: a Nutrient for the Horse. Eq. Vet. Data, 1986.

Mindell, E.L.: The MSM Miracle. Enhance Your Health with Organic Sulfur. Good Health Guides, Keats Publishing, Inc, Connecticut, USA: 1997.

Ley, B.M.: The Forgotten Nutrient MSM: on Our Way Back to Health with Sulfur. Health Learning Handbooks, BL Publications, California: 1998.

Owen, B.: Ask Dr. Bob?? Why MSM?? Health Hope Publishing House, California, 1997

Jacob, S.W: The Current Status of MSM in Medicine. Am. Acad. Med. Prev., 1983.

Jacob, S.W. and Herschler, R.J.: Introductory Remarks: Dimethylsulfoxide after Twenty Years. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.: 1983.

Moore, R.D. and Morton, J.I.: Diminished Inflamatory Joint Disease in Mice Ingesting Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) or Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM). Fed. of Am. Soc. for Exp. Biol., Proceedings 69th Ann. Meeting 1985: 692.

Richmond, V.L.: Incorporation of Methylsulfonylmethane into Guinea Pig Serum Proteins. Life Sciences 1986, vol. 39, pp 263-268.

Morton, J.I. and Siegel, B.V.: Effects of Oral Dimethylsufoxide (DMSO) and Dimethylsulfone (MSM) on Murine Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Disease. Proc. Of the Soc. for Exper. Bio. and Med. 1986, vol. 183, pp. 227-230.

Munck-Khoe, L.K. de: Vitaminen, Hardware of Software? Deel 1. Ortho 14(5), 1996: 204-211.

Munck-Khoe, L.K. de: Vitaminen, Hardware of Software? Deel 2. Ortho 14(6), 1996: 252-261.

Vos, R. de: De Magie Van Het Leven Zit in De Chemie. Folia Orthica 1998 (1): 7-10.

Lamers, H.J.: Ferdinand Huneke, Ontdekker en Grondlegger van de Neuraaltherapie. Tijdschr. Voor Integr. Geneesk. 1996; 12(1): 18-22.

Nieuwenhuis, R.A.: Anti-oxidanten, De Effectieve Beschermers van Onze Gezondheid. Orthos Media, Den Haag, 1993

From http://www.msm-info.com/

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Meeting God Face To Face

Man is not fated to being merely human; the human condition is perennially evolving and transmogrifying into the true Godlikeness inherent in even the most errant of hominids. It is not by breaking with Nature and with our own natural inclinations that our true likeness to God is exposed; it is, rather, by acknowledging and fully participating in our own natural Godhood that we may continue to evolve into a fully matured, fully upright and unfallen species of divinely Human men and women.

Gone now are the days when religion shone its penetrative searchlight on scattered tribes of uncivilized hominids, seeking to humanize the fire-wielding, tool-making proto-humans of the late Cro-Magnon era. Time is now for religion to serve the needs of a species of Being now much more angel than ape; time is now for the divinization of human civilization, and the full deployment of the deific inventiveness so characteristic of the Human Spirit.

Time is now for religion to cease from disparaging Mankind’s humanity. True theology should no longer regard Humankind as perennially deficient and in a permanent state of spiritual shortage, but rather recognize that our plentifulness of naturally human traits are truly signs of our collective spiritual abundance. Religion has indeed initiated society into the Mysteries of God; but time is now for religion to evolve our society into a civilization capable of exposing its own true Godlikeness, a more fully evolved species thoroughly readied and enabled to manifest and reveal its own innate, natural-born Divinity.

The mystic transcendence of our mortal limitations into which our religions initiate us is no lonely flight away from the World, nor does it encourage the continued condemnation of the human condition. On the contrary: the transcendent viewpoint bestowed upon those gifted with the theophany of mystic ecstasy provides them the inspiration for a deeper participation in the life of the World-- the fostering of a more angelic human species, and the nurturing of the long promised Utopia, the Golden Age that yet awaits the full employment of our deific inventiveness for its future construction. True theology does not disparage the natural World, nor the inclinations to which authentic participation in the life of Nature dispose us. Genuine religious faith makes us better caretakers of the blessings we find everywhere disclosed in the natural World, and allows the Spirit its rightful freedom to partake of the God-given miracles that naturally exude from our healthy human bodies.

Humankind’s natural tendency towards mystic transcendence is not something to be cloistered away in hermitages and chapels. The evolving global civilization will be much better served by the public sacramentalizing of each and every aspect of our common humanity. Each and every object of the material world needs to be rightfully regarded as holy, sacred, sublime. The human body itself needs to be properly esteemed as the crown of God’s creativeness, the foremost instrument of the Spirit’s expression.

Time is now when we must meet ourselves face to face, and see ourselves as we truly are. Time is now for the end of one age and the beginning of another, new evolutionary age. Time is now for the reclaiming of our original nature, our divine heritage and birthright, our true and properly destined stance in the Cosmos. Time is now for God to put on a human face-- or rather, time is now that Man’s own countenance should shine with the creative Light of God.

from http://upwinger.blogspot.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Health Benefits Of Cocoa

Epicatechin is biochemical found in teas, wine, chocolate and some fruit and vegetables.

Norman Hollenberg, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, believes that epicatechin is so important that it should be considered a vitamin.

Hollenberg has spent years studying the benefits of cocoa drinking on the Kuna people in Panama. He found that the risk of 4 of the 5 most common killer diseases: stroke, heart failure, cancer and diabetes, is reduced to less then 10% in the Kuna. They can drink up to 40 cups of cocoa a week.

Natural cocoa has high levels of epicatechin.

'If these observations predict the future, then we can say without blushing that they are among the most important observations in the history of medicine,' Hollenberg says. 'We all agree that penicillin and anaesthesia are enormously important. But epicatechin could potentially get rid of 4 of the 5 most common diseases in the western world, how important does that make epicatechin?... I would say very important'

Nutrition expert Daniel Fabricant says that Hollenberg's results, although observational, are so impressive that they may even warrant a rethink of how vitamins are defined. Epicatechin does not currently meet the criteria. Vitamins are defined as essential to the normal functioning, metabolism, regulation and growth of cells and deficiency is usually linked to disease.

At the moment, the science does not support epicatechin having an essential role. But, Fabricant, who is vice president scientific affairs at the Natural Products Association, says: 'the link between high epicatechin consumption and a decreased risk of killer disease is so striking, it should be investigated further. It may be that these diseases are the result of epicatechin deficiency,' he says.

Currently, there are only 13 essential vitamins. An increase in the number of vitamins would provide significant opportunity for nutritional companies to expand their range of products. Flavanols like epicatechin are removed for commercial cocoas because they tend to have a bitter taste.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070311202024.htm

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

The Global Warming Swindle (Video)

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Opening Windows In Time

Can "time windows" into other worlds be opened and let us view scenes from the past or future?

This is the story of Leonard Hall, who for a brief moment saw glimpses of past events that happened 400 hundred years ago.

Did a "time window" accidentally open in front of him?


In 1941, Leonard Hall and his friends went on a fishing trip on Missouri's crystal-clear Upper Current River. They set up a camp close to the beautiful Ozark Mountains. During the day, they went fishing and in the night, they slept in their tents. It was an ideal vacation. Then one early morning, at the dawn, unfamiliar voices woke Leonard Hall.

He assumed someone must have set up a camp in the vicinity and went out to find out what was happening outside. To his surprise, he noticed that someone had built a small fire about 100 feet from his and his friends' tents.
When Leonard Hall glanced to left, he saw more fires along the river and a small group of people. Hall had a feeling there was something strange about these people. They looked as if they came from somewhere else. They simply did not belong there.

It was difficult to hear what they were actually saying, but Hall noticed some of them spoke broken Spanish. Among them were several Indians dressed in traditional clothing.
As he watched the people standing at the river and listened to their voices, the image was slowly fading away.

A couple of minutes later, there was no fire, and the people and the voices were gone.



Leonard Hall stood for along while at the spot, trying to come to terms with what he had just seen. Did he imagine everything? Was it a dream? But he was awake and his mind was clear.
He went to his friends and told them his story. Together they all walked to the place where Hall heard the voices and saw the people, but nothing was there. There were no signs of recent fire. The place was empty.
His friends explained to him that he must have been tired and his imagination had played a trick on him.

When Hall returned home he could not forget the event and decided to visit the local library. Perhaps an answer or a clue could be found in one of history books. He searched through the archives and finally found what he was looking for, a possible solution to the mysterious incident he recently experienced.

In one of the books, he discovered an old document from which he learned something that surprised him. The document described how a small group of Spanish conquistadors led by the Dominican priest Domingo de Soto (1494-1560) were camping near the Upper Current River. The Spaniards were accompanied by Indians, who acted as their servants.

This event occurred 400 years ago, in August 1541!

Occasionally, it has happened that "time windows" open and let us view events, which occurred in the past. This is an unexplained and fascinating phenomenon.

There are many things which cannot be accected and fully understood by our minds even if they are true. If there is no absolute present, then it is possible to observe past events in this reality. This might even be possible without the use of any instruments. Present is built on the past. So, the past cannot be unreal because our reality cannot emerge out of unreality.

N.A. Mozorov, a revolutionary Russian scientist, once said: "If instead of being drifted towards unknown horizons by the uniform current of Time we could travel on it - into the past or the future as we chose, then Time would appear only as a dimension, exactly as height, depth or thickness."

This leads us back to the question: Did Leonard Hall accidentally stumble upon a "time window"?

From www.ufoarea.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon

Review: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (2001)
Directed by Bart Sibrel
Runtime 47 minutes

The Movie

Of all the conspiracy theories to subscribe to, few will destroy your reputation and credibility faster than the moon landing hoax. Even heavily criticized esoteric theorists like Richard C. Hoagland--despite having made a career of trying to expose NASA conspiracy--refuse to believe that we faked the Moon landing. But not so for documentary filmmaker Bart Sibrel. Sibrel laid it all on the line in his first of two films, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. Although I admit that I am by no means an expert when it comes to this subject, and thus may not have been able to spot inaccuracies in Sibrel's data as other, more qualified, viewers have, I must say that after viewing this film, my mind is now more open to the prospect of the Moon landing hoax theory.

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon (or 'A Funny Thing...' for the purposes of this review) opens quite irregularly. With the reciting of a few Bible verses and a mini history lesson about the Tower of Babel dominating much of the prologue, I had to double check that I was indeed watching the intended movie. But sure enough, Sibrel was trying to make some kind of connection between man's ambition--and God's subsequent irony in keeping it in place--and the moon landing. I can see what he was trying to do, but in practice I think it was ultimately the wrong choice to make. Right off the bat, he succeeded in muddying the waters by grouping both politics and religion to what should have been a straightforward, factual investigation. Not a good start, at all.

Though what followed was probably the high point of the documentary for me. Having little to do with anything, there's about a five minute montage of failed rocket launches and massive explosions set to some jazzy song that was far too reminiscent of the ending to Dr. Strangelove. But really, nothing says 'fun' like a gag-reel of failure and igniting rocket fuel. The movie then goes on to document the volatile state of the Cold War arms race and how America was slipping fast when it came to space travel. By first creating a foundation of motive for the US to perpetrate "the greatest government conspiracy of all time," Sibrel does at least a good job at explaining perhaps why we would hoax such a monumental event.

The first (and probably one of the most convincing) bit of evidence covered is the complications to NASA's official story caused by Van Allen belt radiation. The astronaut's shuttle, Sibrel argues, was nowhere near shielded enough to protect them from the dangerous radiation bombarding them on the way to the Moon. He goes on to say that the amount of lead required would have been impractically heavy. I don't know just how dangerous these Van Allen belts are to space travelers and, unfortunately (coincidentally?), Sibrel really doesn't delve too deeply into the science of it, but on the surface, it seems like a valid point.

Over the next 15 to 20 minutes, A Funny Thing... goes on to cover everything from photographic inconsistencies to the guilt faced by astronauts such as Neil Armstrong; who, as Sibrel points out, has never agreed to do a one-on-one interview regarding his first historic steps. The Armstrong bits were none that interesting, but the photographic stuff was pretty intriguing. I've heard most of this covered in other mediums in the past, but it was particularly powerful to see the actual pictures as the various errors and inconsistencies were narrated. The most convincing of this photographic proof for me was the analysis of the shadows cast on the lunar surface. If, as the official NASA report claims, the astronauts brought no artificial lighting units with them, then why is it that several shadows can be seen perpendicular to each other? Moreover, despite some photos showing that the shadowed regions of large rock formations are pitch black, how is it that detail could still be made out on images capturing the side of the lunar-lander facing away from the Sun? Then of course the mysteries of the superimposed cross-hair being shown behind objects and the US flag supposedly blowing in a non-existent wind were covered to good effect. All in all, I'd say that it was a pretty successful body of evidence leading to the possibility that, at the very least, images and video of the mission were altered by NASA.

To bring A Funny Thing... to a close, Sibrel tries to present the smoking gun of the Moon landing hoax. He shows a series of videos that, if taken at face value, show the astronauts essentially deceiving the Houston technicians and faking the shots of the Earth to make it appear that they were further away from it than they really were. It's unfortunate that Sibrel didn't just let the footage play, however, as the frequent cuts and imposed narration during this segment leads me to think he wasn't presenting the whole story. But suspicions aside, it was definitely a 'holy crap!' moment for me. Likewise, a video shown that contains what sounds like a mysterious voice transmitting instructions to the crew on how to deceive Houston was troubling. If true, this pretty much blows the lid off the whole thing. It's just too bad this relatively short documentary doesn't focus more on this subject.


The DVD

Bart Sibrel is what you would call an amateur filmmaker. Fittingly, A Funny Thing... shares a markedly amateur feel to it. Although the DVD cover itself is sufficiently eye-catching, the main menu once you get the movie going is definitely barebones. Moreover, except for a well-done animation showing the location of the Van Allen belts, A Funny Thing...'s effects and title work are nothing to write home about.

Comprised entirely of stock video footage and still images, there's really not much to be said regarding video quality. The vast majority of the video clips are of the Moon landing itself or from news coverage at the time so, suffice it to say, are pretty low quality. But where it counts, i.e. when analyzing shadows on still images, clarity is at an acceptable level. As far as audio quality is concerned, the crisp narration track provided by Anne Tonelson is great. Her British accent, if nothing else, adds some subliminal credibility to the movie as a whole. The understated, mainly instrumental soundtrack is also quite fitting.

Though as far as DVDs go, A Funny Thing... is pretty much as lacking as possible when it comes to special features. Frankly speaking, there are none. The scene selection is a welcome addition (though not entirely necessary for a film less than 60 minutes long), but the only other option on the main menu besides 'Play' is a useless link to Sibrel's website.

Whoop-de-doo...


Final Thoughts

Although creator Bart Sibrel takes the risk of coming out as a Moon hoax theory supporter--and provides more than a few eye-brow raising pieces of evidence in the process--I found it disappointing that he didn't actually appear (in voice nor image) at all in his movie. Likewise, I found the closing comments that the Apollo astronauts will come clean before they die to be in bad taste. It seemed to me that an anti-astronaut undertone permeated much of the movie.

But director baggage aside, the facts do speak for themselves. For uninformed viewers like myself, A Funny Thing... will certainly be an eye-opening experience. And although I'm not totally convinced, I do indeed have a new outlook when it comes to the Moon hoax theory, as well as its key proponents. Maybe this stuff isn't as crazy as everyone wants me to believe...?

From www.binallofamerica.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Schizoid Sexual Attraction

Ever wondered why uncouth, scruffy rock musicians are pursued by legions of doting, lovelorn female fans? Or why women threw themselves at Pablo Picasso? Well, a new study suggests that creativity may confer an evolutionary advantage in finding a mate; indicating that creative types have increased sexual appeal. But paradoxically, people who have certain traits predictive of schizophrenia - a condition not normally associated with evolutionary fitness - also have a higher propensity toward artistic ability. This creative ability, say some evolutionary experts, is far from being a disadvantage, as creativity is highly attractive when it comes to mate choice.

Like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett and Stephen Pinker, evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey Miller considers sexual selection to be right up there in importance with natural selection. Advocates of sexual selection argue that competition between members of the same sex drives the evolution of particular traits that mates of the opposite sex find attractive. Miller, author of The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature, claims that traits like morality, art, language and creativity, influence the way in which the human mind evolves. It may sound like a stretch, but recent studies show that reliable predictions of mate choice can be made using these kinds of traits as a guide. Before looking more closely at these studies, however, it's worth first considering whether creativity is actually quantifiable.

Neuroscientist V. S. Ramachandran's musings on savants, who display exceptional skills in a very specific field, is illuminating in this respect, as he "unashamedly speculates" that a savant's talents may stem from an enlarged section of the brain called the angular gyrus. "You can imagine an explosion of talent resulting from this simple but 'anomalous' increase in brain volume," says Ramachandran, adding: "The same argument might hold for drawing, music, language, indeed any human trait." Ramachandran explains that this theory is at least in part testable, and points to examples where damage to the right parietal cortex "can profoundly disrupt artistic skills, just as damage to the left disrupts calculation." Ramachandran also considers possible the idea that these esoteric human traits can be attractive to mates in the way that a male peacock's plume is attractive, as exceptional ability in music, poetry or drawing may be an "externally visible signature of a giant brain." Citing Dawkins, Ramachandran argues "that this 'truth in advertising' may play an important role in mate selection."

Despite what seems to be logically valid reasoning, Ramachandran stresses that the talents and specializations associated with the savant are not enough. They will not become a Picasso or Einstein, because they are missing one vital, ineffable ingredient: creativity. "There are those who assert that creativity is simply the ability to randomly link seemingly unrelated ideas, but surely that is not enough," writes Ramachandran. We may have a fantastic grasp of language, and think that we can knock out a half decent metaphor on call, but it is actually harder than most people think. Yet when we come across something truly creative, it speaks volumes to us, "In fact," says Ramachandran, "it's crystal clear once it is explained and has that 'why didn't I think of that?' quality that characterizes the most beautiful and creative insights."

But if creative juices are responsible for an evolutionary advantage, there must surely be some aspect of this seemingly ineffable trait that can be identified as heritable. This brings us back to Geoffrey Miller, who argues that traits such as creativity are a result of personality disorders such as schizophrenia. Yes, that's right; Miller is arguing that what is usually considered to be an evolutionary disadvantage is actually just the opposite.

After conducting their own study, researchers Daniel Nettle and Helen Clegg believe that they have confirmed Miller's assertions, and in doing so have solved a long standing mystery. "There is an evolutionary puzzle surrounding the persistence of schizophrenia, since it is substantially heritable and associated with sharply reduced fitness," the authors begin in their paper entitled "Schizotypy, creativity and mating success in humans", published in The Proceedings of the Royal Society. The authors cite previous studies that claim schizophrenia is associated with poor health and reduced chances of reproduction, but add: "The fact that this does not appear to happen has lead many commentators to speculate that there must be other, beneficial effects of the traits."

Nettle and Clegg state that schizophrenia-proneness manifests in a number of different personality traits collectively known as schizotypy, with schizotypy coming in 4 distinct dimensions. Schizophrenia patients score more highly on all 4 dimensions, say the authors, with schizotypy scores being predictive of schizophrenia in longitudinal studies. The authors also point to studies of people within the creative arts who display increased levels of certain schizotypy traits, as well as a bulging case file of people with psychiatric illness in artistically successful families. Nettle and Clegg believe that there is enough evidence to support the idea that "artistic creativity is a candidate for the evolutionarily beneficial effect of schizotypy."

Studying a cross section of the community which was augmented by a targeted sampling of artists and poets, Nettle and Clegg set about examining the subjects' mating conquests, measured by such things as the length, type and number of encounters each subject had. The study included a mix of the 4 schizotypy dimensions:

Unusual experiences
Contains items referring to perceptual and cognitive aberrations and magical thinking.
Cognitive disorganization
Describes difficulties of attention and concentration.
Impulsive non-conformity
Refers to violent and reckless behaviors.
Introvertive anhedonia
Measures lack of enjoyment and social withdrawal.
It was found that not all schizotypy dimensions are advantageous in regard to creative attractiveness. Cognitive disorganization, for example, was not included in the path analysis, because they found it had no significant bearing on creativity or mating success, and introvertive anhedonia was found to have an inhibiting effect on both creativity and the number of mates.

Of the two remaining dimensions, unusual experiences was found to have a positive impact on creative activity, which in turn led to a positive effect on the number of partners, while impulsive non-conformity had a significant positive effect on the number of partners. Nettle and Clegg believe that these results are enough to support Miller's hypothesis that artistic creativity functions as a mating display. "The results are consistent with the view that schizotypal traits are maintained in the human population at significant levels because the negative effects in terms of psychosis and other psychopathology are offset by enhanced mating success."

These findings raise interesting questions. Where do we acquire our receptiveness to creativity and our appreciation for creative works? Is it innate, or are the people exhibiting creative schizotypy traits doing the hard work for us, by presenting reality to us in novel, imaginative and inventive ways? Whether or not we have a natural capacity for creative appreciation, our like or dislike of specific creative works may be primed by prior creative achievements.

One recent study illustrates this point. It examined what is known as "white space" in the advertising industry, and showed that what might appear to be an innate pull toward specific aesthetics in humans has actually been acquired from prior periods in art. In this particular case, the researchers found that our appreciation for white space - and the refined, chic qualities it conveys - harked back to the 1950s minimalist period. They also found that subjects unaware of the origins of white space still appreciated its intended qualities nonetheless. Given these findings, can we conclude that while humans have a capacity for creativity or creative appreciation, that this creativity is influenced by social norms predicated on past creative periods? A creative feedback loop, if you like, that constantly advertises one aspect of evolutionary fitness: creativity.

From www.scienceagogo.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Dummies Guide To Mind Reading

What would a world where we could read each other's thoughts be like? Frightening? Peaceful? Boring? Would we become like a colony of worker ants? At present, perhaps thankfully, this question remains in the realm of philosophical musings, but, believe it or not, science is beginning to make some progress in the head-tapping department.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and some complex algorithms, researchers say that they have been able to identify how and where the brain stores our "intentions," or our planned decisions. While this is remarkable in itself, researchers have been able to use this knowledge to convincingly forecast a subject's intentions when faced with the choice of two tasks. If our minds turn out to be this deterministic at much more complex levels, then the thought police could soon be on their way.

Once upon a time, the brain was a closed shop, and so too our thoughts, but that was before the advent of fMRI and PET scans. Now, these devices enable scientists to get a good look at the brain and discover which regions are most likely responsible for our thoughts and actions. Rather than directly identifying actual neural activity as you might expect, fMRI works by measuring changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and blood oxygenation levels (together known as hemodynamic, or literally blood-dynamic, responses) that occur as a consequence of neural activity.

This association between neural activity and blood flow is not a new one, with the idea first being conceived around 100 years ago. Basically, when nerve cells are active they consume the oxygen carried by red blood cells, which means that an increase in blood flow will be detected where there is increased neural activity, after a delay of roughly 1-5 seconds. It was this concept and the latest fMRI technology that allowed Professor John-Dylan Haynes, from the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, to "read" subjects' intentions based on their neural activity.

During Haynes experiment, subjects were told to choose freely between two future actions - to either subtract, or add, two numbers - and to then hold this intention for a moment until they were presented with two unknown numbers on a screen. Remarkably, prior to having seen the numbers, the researchers were able to identify the subject's intentions with 70 percent accuracy by imaging patterns of activity in the brain's prefrontal cortex. Of course, the numbers were eventually splashed onto the screen to confirm that an intention specific to the task had in fact been identified, rather than some other intention. "It had been previously assumed that freely selected plans might be stored in the middle regions of the prefrontal cortex, whereas plans following external instructions could be stored on the surface of the brain. We were able to confirm this theory in our experiments," said Haynes.

A critical aspect of Haynes' work was the introduction of new computer software to recognize typical activation patterns in the brain associated with specific thoughts, called "multivariate pattern recognition". Haynes says that once the computer has been adequately "trained" to make these connections, it can predict the intentions of subjects solely on brain activity. During the course of "reading" people's minds, Professor Haynes says that his experiments have also revealed some intriguing insights regarding brain function. "The experiments show that intentions are not encoded in single neurons but in a whole spatial pattern of brain activity," says Haynes. "Intentions for future actions that are encoded in one part of the brain need to be copied to a different region to be executed."

So, do we now have to accede to the fact that our most intimate thoughts will one day be available to others? Well, don't retreat to the safety of your tin-foil hat just yet, as there is healthy skepticism regarding Haynes' research.

One criticism concerns something called "hemodynamic lag", which refers to the 1-5 second period between neural activity and the blood flow that the fMRI identifies. If this were unaccounted for it would certainly produce some bogus results. But in this case the criticisms seem unfounded. "Our data analysis takes this known hemodynamic lag into account, as one would expect from a good study," says Haynes. Fair enough, but what about the concerns raised by some fMRI researchers regarding vascular differences in subjects; wouldn't that affect the results? Aren't all our brain physiologies just far too different for a universal thought reading device to be useful? Well, the answer to that, too, seems to be no.

In a separate study conducted at the Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, researchers have used mathematical models to show that while our brains may be wired differently, a comparable pattern of neural activity and function can be observed between two brains when exposed to similar sensory input. Which may not seem like a big deal; after all, arriving at the same idea or solution as a colleague isn't a rare occurrence. But when you consider the sheer number of neurons and networks involved in the process, there would seem to be little chance for us to come up with the same answer at all. Even in a "network of 1,000 neurons, where each neuron can be connected to any other, there are a million possible contacts between any two neurons and consequently an unimaginably large number of possible networks," say researchers Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer and Marc Timme. "Each combination can have either an inhibiting or an activating effect on the downstream neuron and, in addition to this, can differ in its intensity and reaction time."

The Memmesheimer and Timme research seems to show that evolution has maintained some predefined neural networks for us to use when problem-solving. If correct, this would imply that any criticism leveled at Haynes' work based on the idea that we all think differently because our brains are wired differently is not a very strong criticism at all.

So, if mind "reading" were possible, what would the possible applications be? One positive application would be in the field of bionics, where paralyzed patients have already been hooked-up to computer-assisted prosthetic devices as well as what have tentatively been labeled "brain computer interfaces". Connected to these computers, patients can operate devices like televisions and PCs because the computer interface can read their intentions. Haynes' research takes these developments a step further, and presumably, at some time in the future it will be possible for people's abstract thoughts and intentions to be read.

Inevitably, in the dark recesses of some bureaucrat's mind, plans to exploit this science in less noble ways are probably being drawn up right now. How comfortable would we feel about authorities arresting people based on a crime they were yet to commit (a la Minority Report)? Not to mention how marketing departments may use such technologies. And if "mind reading" technology does become available, how would it change the dynamics of friendship, or society itself?

From www.scienceagogo.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

23.5 Degrees

By Gary Osborn - Member of The Book of THoTH Taken from Axis of God. Copyright © Gary Osborn 2005. All Rights Reserved.

For many years, we have been told by Egyptologists and historians that the pyramids of ancient Egypt were the tombs of the Pharaohs and nothing more.

This is the ‘official line’ and this could indeed be true as regards the majority of the pyramids in Egypt which were clearly built by the ancient Egyptians – many of which collapsed to rubble soon after being built.

But ask the many researchers (those not funded by institutions) who have made a life time study of the pyramids, and they would most likely tell you that the Great Pyramid of Giza is unique – not just because it is a perfect pyramid which has withstood the ravages of time – but because it appears that one of its purposes was to preserve knowledge.

They will also tell you that much meaningful information has already been derived from the Great Pyramid, even though many scholars and academics – i.e., those funded by the institutions and establishments – have never really accepted this data and continue to ignore it.

During the last months of 2002, I made a new major discovery about the Great Pyramid of Giza: that the Polar or Celestial Axis of the Earth, which is presently tilted at 23.43 degrees, (given the round figure of 23.5º in most text books on the subject) is clearly referenced in the geometrical structure of the Pyramid.

Furthermore, it appears that the overall structure and certain internal features of the pyramid also contain data about the Earth’s geophysics and orbital dynamics.

We also find that the Great Pyramid is actually pointing to its own location on the earth – being almost 30º N from the Equator, and this is the decisive factor for me as regards the credibility of this encoded information.

This new discovery about the Great Pyramid is remarkable in itself; but how I actually uncovered this hidden information never fails to amaze me – even now as I reflect on it – as it involved a 17th century painter who on the surface appears to have had nothing to do with Egypt and the pyramids of Giza . . . an artist whose works of art are believed to contain a code which many researchers have endeavored for years to decipher with no real success.

It would surprise many to learn that I first discovered this information about the Great Pyramid through studying and deciphering the hidden codes in three paintings by the French artist Nicolas Poussin (1594–1665). These initial discoveries and my own interpretation of the data will be revealed for the first time in my book Axis of God.

Furthermore, and since 2002 whilst researching into these discoveries, I have uncovered much additional data as to ‘why’ this information had been encoded – data which is very supportive of my initial findings.

For instance, I made the amazing ‘bonus’ discovery that the angle of 23.5º had been deliberately encoded in numerous different sources throughout history.

Its one thing to find this angle for the first time in the geometrical structure of the Great Pyramid and also the layout of the Giza necropolis; but to find this same angle having been deliberately encoded over and over again in various works of art – i.e., paintings, sculptures, architecture, symbolic imagery – both ancient and contemporary – is quite staggering.

One could and would argue that according to the ‘law of averages’, this angle is sure to appear in many paintings and as frequently as all the other angles we can extract from a 360º circle.

However, the truth is, that the paintings or sources I have analyzed are all associated by theme, and also contain deliberately planned, conspicuous linear items and features that are just “begging to be measured” so as to obtain the angles being presented.

For the sake of balancing the argument and to try to prove myself wrong, I also looked into the fact that the angle of 22.5 degrees is also a common angle used in art for perspective, as 22.5º is one sixteenth of a 360º circle. I mention this so that others would be aware of this and could perhaps use this in their argument and so test this themselves if interested.
I must point out that I have examined many paintings, and have found that although some of the overall ‘perspective features’ in some paintings are in the ‘right ball-park’ and could therefore be associated with the 22.5º angle of perspective so as to support this given fact, I have found that many suspect features, such as staffs, poles, flagpoles, spears, lances, clubs, bones, limbs, swords and other linear objects, are definitely at an angle of 23.5º or even 23 degrees.

We find this with certain linear items or features in well-known Masonic symbols and esoteric symbolism – and especially those we find in highly symbolic paintings portraying mystical or religious themes.

Furthermore, although very close, the angle of 23.5º is not mentioned as having anything to do with the common angles of perspective, so the many references to this angle must mean something else – and for the time being, the obliquity (tilt) of the earth’s axis is the main contender for me.

For example, the angle of 23 degrees appears quite implicitly in ancient Egyptian art – especially illustrations or wall-relief scenes that feature the Djed Column.

This is significant, as the Djed Column represents not only the backbone of the god Osiris but also the earth’s axis – hence the title I have given to my present work – Axis of God.

But it is at this point that we may ask, ‘why’ is the earth’s inclined axis being referenced in all these sources? After all, some believe, and are of the opinion, that the tilt of the earth’s axis is a ‘natural phenomenon’, and that the 23.5º tilt is necessary as the summer and winter cycles govern life on our planet. But, if this is true, then why do we find references to the angle of 23.5º in paintings on the theme of death, battle, war and conflict?

What exactly did the ‘initiate’ artists know – those who gave reference to this angle? . . What were these people trying to tell us?

My own interpretation, based on a lot more evidence which I have found and have yet to present, is that it was believed by the ‘initiated’ that the tilt of the earth isn’t natural, nor is it an ideal situation. Indeed it is a fact that the early Greek philosophers considered the tilt of the earth to be an unnatural and “irregular condition” and not something that had been set in motion since the beginning of creation.

Surprisingly, the angle of 23.5º appears in many medieval illustrations – especially those based on the macabre Dance of Death – a popular theme after the plagues that swept through Europe – as well as themes like the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

The same angle turns up in many paintings from the Baroque period (17th century) – especially paintings on the Vanitas theme which were popular in Europe at that time.

Vanitas means ‘emptiness’ or ‘untruth’ from which we derive the English word ‘vanity’. These compositions are usually ‘still life’ images or genre subjects with the objects symbolising the transience of life and mostly always feature a human skull, arm and thigh bones, antiquarian books, swords, candles, musical instruments, an hourglass and other paraphernalia arranged somewhat haphazardly on a table or large ornate chair.

Skulls are also an endemic feature in many of the 17th century paintings on the “ET IN ARCADIA” theme – again those by the painter Nicolas Poussin and also the painter Guercino (1618–1622).

As the examples cited above shows, it appears that the people who have been placing these references to the angle of 23.5º in many different sources throughout history are telling us that the tilt is associated with ‘death’.

The only explanation I could see, is that it was/is believed by those who have encoded this information, that division, argument, war and all kinds of conflict – regarded as natural elements in human nature and experience – is really the result of the tilt of the earth’s axis; or that the tilt reflects this imbalance and general disharmony in the system linked to the collective human consciousness and vice-versa.

From my research into these references and the cross-referencing of significant data relating to them, I’m compelled to look into the possibility that long ago something dramatic happened to the earth which caused it to tilt from an ‘upright position’ – almost causing the death of the human race and everything on the earth. Man then fell into the cycles of time, and as every mystical or ‘esoteric initiate’ knows, cycles mean ‘entrapment’ for the soul, which is trying to escape these repeating cycles and patterns.

Perhaps this is the real meaning behind the ‘fall of man’ related to the story of the Garden of Eden in the Bible, because as any geophysicist would tell you, if the earth was upright – i.e., 0º – there would be no seasons. Most regions of the earth, especially the belt areas above and below the equator, would be of temperate climate – a ‘continual springtime’ where no winter season would exist to bring a temporary halt to nature. There would be an abundance of food, and fertility would be at an all time high . . . a virtual Garden of Eden. Was this the Golden Age – known as Zep Tepi “the First Time” by the ancient Egyptians? Was this utopian paradise known as Arcadia?

If the earth did not tilt from an upright position, and had never been vertical, then to explain these references, it appears that such a scenario was nevertheless believed by many to have happened, or perhaps the vertical position of the earth was possibly an ‘ideal’ that only existed in the mind of man and largely based on ‘upright’ spiritual ideas and concepts that are shamanic in origin. I cannot stress this enough, because it’s not my intention to prove that the earth was once upright, nor my own belief that it ever was – only to bring attention to the evidence that it was once ‘believed’, and perhaps still believed, that this was once a reality, and/or should be or will be again. The evidence for this is in the many encoded references that this research now brings attention to for the first time in hundreds, if not thousands of years.

Furthermore, we find that the same angle appears in paintings that feature Jesus and other avatars and saints – especially scenes of the Crucifixion and also paintings that express the theme of enlightenment and illumination.
Many of us are only now discovering that the Jesus story is really based on the shamanic and pagan conception of the ‘resurrection god’ of many cultures, who in ancient Egypt was represented by the god Osiris and also Horus – the son and reincarnated-self of Osiris.

Keeping this in mind, we can see how the Crucifixion of Christ – especially the Cross which is tilted when carried by Christ to his place of execution and then raised up vertically, is really based on the ancient Egyptian ritual of the ‘raising of the Djed Column’ from its tilted position of 23.5º. The Djed was the Axis of God – being the spine of Osiris, which represented the earth’s axis and vice-versa, and it was raised on the Spring Equinox – one of only two days in the year that has the same conditions as the earth would be if it were upright – i.e., equal hours of day and night and temperate climate.

As many of us know, it is said that Jesus the Christ was crucified on the ‘Hill of Golgotha’, (“place of the skull”) during Easter (associated with the Spring Equinox), and it was from this vertical position that Christ then ascended to heaven; and this part of the story is important, because we are being told that the only way we can enter heaven is by being ‘upright’ and in every way that we can apply the term – meaning properly centred and balanced in both mind and body.

And although this could be interpreted in terms of upright spiritual values, principles and morals, we are nevertheless also being told that at once upon a time, and perhaps during a Golden Age, the earth was not inclined at 23.5 degrees like it is now, but was indeed upright. The vertical axis represented the spine of man, and we are being told that through this ‘erect’ position of the earth, man and all creation had a direct link with the Creator – represented by the ‘ecliptic centre’ in the heavens – the zero still-point to which the celestial pole of the earth would be pointing if vertical.

We can now see why the angle of 23.5º also appears in many religious drawings and paintings, and also those that depict an enigmatic individual who stands as an example of spiritual enlightenment and illumination, because the evidence suggests that the original shamanic and pagan conceptions that were used by the Church to establish Christianity were originally based on the ‘resurrection god’ and the rebirth of the shaman ‘saviour’ who was ’believed’ to have the power to ‘resurrect’ the earth’s axis back to its vertical position and bring back the balance of the Golden Age in terms of ‘healing’ the duality and imbalance in human consciousness.

This was the original belief behind the messiah/sun-god concept and it appears to have developed from the knowledge and cosmological ideas of those who appear to have survived a global catastrophe – survivors of an advanced culture or civilisation, whose knowledge was based on shamanic experience and conceptions. It were they perhaps, who understood man’s spiritual side and possessed the wisdom that we now know as ‘esoteric knowledge’ – much of which is ancient and had been passed down to us from some remote and distant age which now resides within the ‘collective unconscious’ only.

All this would explain why the angle of 23.5 degrees is referenced in sources that express both themes – i.e., illumination and enlightenment, and also death – meaning the near death of the human race due to the catastrophe that had once befallen the earth, or so it was believed. This explains the theme of the human skull which is not only referenced as the “place of the skull” on which Jesus was crucified and often depicted beneath the Cross in paintings of the Crucifixion, but it also features prominently in many of the Vanitas paintings . . . and also makes an appearance in Shakespeare’s play Hamlet.

It must be said that the story of Hamlet was based on the tragic story of Osiris, Set and Horus, and according to the book Hamlet’s Mill (1969) by authors, Hertha von Deschend and Giorgio de Santillana (a professor or the history of science), the original versions of the story – i.e, ancient myths and very old folk stories from all over Europe and also Asia – contain encoded information about Precession and the orbital dynamics of the earth.

The theme of decay, war, conflict and ruin, (imbalance) in which this angle can also be found repeatedly, appears to be associated with the symbolic “death” of the human race as a whole, in that man’s present condition is that his direct line (spine) with the Creator has been “severed” by the tilt of the earth, and so only those who have become enlightened and have been able to attain that link and maintain it by remaining balanced and centred in mind and body, can make it into heaven and perhaps reverse this situation for all by presenting themselves as an example.

In brief, this is the purpose of the ‘saviour’ who is reborn at the ‘end-beginning point’ (alpha-omega) of every Astrological Age to deliver his message of enlightenment as allegorized in the Crucifixion, and so he stands as an example to those who have maintained that link and to ‘awaken’ and remind everyone of us of our own potential to achieve the same.

Again this was the original idea and belief behind the ‘messiah mythos’, and such beliefs may still be in existence today by those who understand the original conception of the ‘One’ who is born again and again to awaken man and perhaps even raise the earth’s axis back to its vertical position via this ‘collective awakening’, as the imbalance of the earth reflects the imbalance in human consciousness and vice-versa.

He is the “once and future king” at the heart or centre of reality; whose spine (the Cross) is the earth’s axis and whose assembly are the 12 signs of the zodiac that surround the earth – each sign representing a 12th part of the human race. He is the 13th.

The more I researched into these discoveries; more remarkable data began to present itself: I found that the angle of 52 degrees is also referenced in these same sources and is almost as frequent as the 23.5-degree references.
This is interesting because the significant thing about the angle of 52º is that this is the angle of the inclined sides of the Great Pyramid of Giza . . .

The Catholic Church was very powerful during the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages – and really until the dawning of Science and the so-called Age of Enlightenment; so to be branded a heretic was very dangerous to one’s health.
Those who knew the truth behind the Church and Christianity would have had to be seen to “toe the line” and so information and knowledge which would have been seen as “heretical” and otherwise suppressed and stamped-out by the Church, would have been encoded – not only to preserve it, but also to secretly pass this knowledge onto others.

Aside from the use of ‘symbolism’, which has been used since ‘time immemorial’, the ideal medium for any code or cipher, and without it being obvious that one has encoded information, is the Arts. After all, to some extent, one has artistic licence to use any imagery one likes in the composition. It’s no surprise then to find that many architectural buildings, sculptures – especially illustrations and paintings – contain codes . . . and often the same code as I myself have discovered. Ironically, we find these codes in paintings that had been commissioned by elite members of the Catholic Church – many of them unaware that they had been patron to ‘heretic initiates’. No doubt many of these initiates had infiltrated the Vatican and were behind a good number of these benefactions and investments.

There is now much evidence to suggest that many elements of the Jesus story as told in the Gospels, are astrotheological; that the story was largely based on the astronomical alignments observed at Giza and the tracking of the constellation of Orion as well as the shadow phenomena associated with the Great Pyramid during the equinoxes and solstices. But more than this, the story was also based on what the pyramids were used for originally; in regard to shamanic initiation into the shamanic trance states, the mysteries of life, death and rebirth (reincarnation) and the ‘enlightenment experience’ – the knowledge of which was later preserved by the Gnostics, the Templars and the Freemasons, to name but a few.

For instance, the constellation of Orion represented the ‘resurrection god’ of many cultures, and in Egypt this was Osiris as well as his son and reincarnated self, Horus.

Again, Jesus the Christ was based on Horus the KRST, and so armed with this knowledge, it could be conjectured that the spear that pierces Christ’s right side in the Gospel of John, might be an encoded reference to the shaft that exits the King’s Chamber and aligns with Al-Nitak in the right side of Orion, according to author Robert Bauval’s ‘Orion Correlation Theory’. This is just one instance and there’s many more.

There is evidence to suggest that Orion was the 13th sign of the zodiac (“round table”) which correlates well with the 13th – the messiah at the centre who has 12 followers – 12 disciples, 12 knights, 12 tribes etc. And we also find that the star Al-Nitak of Orion was used as a kind of “gauge marker” to chart the cycle of precession – a phenomenon which is associated with the obliquity (tilt) of the earth’s axis and that this charting was implemented at Giza, which has been described as a ‘precessional clock’.

But why chart the cycle of precession? Unless “Precession is a post cataclysmic phenomenon” as geoscientists Allan and Delair have stated.

These are the themes I will be addressing and examining closely in the course of my work – and I should add that the crux of Allan and Delair’s theory is that the earth was once upright, and only several thousand years ago, having become tilted due to comet fragments from a supernova explosion in the region of the Vela star system.

Now let’s say that you possessed information that would be seen as “heretical”: that you understood that the stories presented in the Bible and the Gospels, and which had been adopted, adapted and promulgated by the Church, had really derived from an earlier knowledge and wisdom that was once known long ago in ancient Egypt, and perhaps even earlier. Let’s also say that you know that the symbolic message behind the geometrical layout of Giza and that the building of the Great Pyramid contains the true meaning behind many of these stories that had been misinterpreted, misconceptualised, and over the years had become corrupted, twisted and exploited in all kinds of ways to manipulate the beliefs of the collective and attain power over the collective consciousness.

Wouldn’t you want to bring attention to this information and knowledge? And if so, then you surely wouldn’t want to make it obvious. You would know that if you wanted to bring attention to the Great Pyramid as the source of all these mysteries, and send a message or communicate an important insight about it to those who would understand, you would only have to give reference to the angle of 52º by drawing or painting a linear object at this angle and emphasising it in such a way that is conspicuous and begging to be examined and measured.

If I am correct about the association between the angle of 52 degrees and the Great Pyramid, then this would also mean that this knowledge, as known only to the initiated, must reach back thousands of years to the time when the Great Pyramid was built and perhaps even earlier.

In any case, all the elements which have been encoded in these many sources throughout history appear to be leading us back to ancient Egypt and Giza – as if revealing the true meaning behind the stories presented in the Gospels, which again, have been adopted, adapted and promulgated by the Church.

But now to the sources themselves . . .

We find the angle of 23.5º and 52º repeated in Templar and Masonic symbolism – such as the Templar Cross Patee or Maltese Cross and also the Masonic Compass and Set-square which we will come to later. Most surprisingly we find the angle of 23.5º in Leonardo Da Vinci’s famous drawing, Vitruvian Man.

The angle of 23.5º is even referenced in one of the most infamous symbols of them all – the “All-Seeing Eye” in the detached and floating capstone of the pyramid from which rays of light radiate – which is really a reference to the Great Pyramid of Giza which is missing its capstone. This symbol is on every US Dollar bill and it’s amazing how people could have missed this.

Another source which gives reference to the angles of 23.5º and 52º, are the Main Streets of Washington DC, which we find on an early map of the Capital City.

Most researchers and writers will often bring attention to the Pentagonal geometry that is said to exist on the Map. However, almost everyone has overlooked the fact that these streets, which converge and centre on the White House, are 23.5º. There is even a 52-degree reference on this map – being the angle of New Hampshire Avenue.

I should also mention that while in the process of uncovering this additional data I have also been helped along the way by others, like my co-author Philip Gardiner and also Canadian researcher, Don Barone, to whom I had divulged some of the key elements of my research concerning these references to 23.5 degrees. The fact that others could find what I had already predicted, proved that I was dealing with a real phenomenon – something that had been overlooked by us all, even though the clues had been “hiding in plain view” and in many different sources throughout our known history – encoded by a secret cabal of people who believed in these things and possibly for good reason.

My own theory, as to the reason why the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt is being referenced along with the angle of 23.5 degrees, is that it might have something to do with the ‘fact’ that the Great Pyramid also contains encoded information about the geophysics of the earth’s axis – again, something I discovered in 2002 – and that perhaps this is one of the major reasons why the GP was built in the first place. It is as if the well-informed people (initiates) who referenced these angles, are telling us that the Great Pyramid, or even Giza itself, contains the answers to the mysteries about our catastrophic past.

Why would this be important?

Well one could perhaps conjecture that the reason why Giza and the GP contains this knowledge, is that in the aftermath of what appears to have been a major catastrophe which tipped the earth and nearly caused the death of the human race and almost everything on the planet, it was decided that knowledge about the geophysics of the earth and other knowledge be preserved. Perhaps this global catastrophe is something that comes around again and again – i.e., cyclic – which would explain the inclusion of the hourglass in many of these Vanitas paintings, as well as the paintings and drawings that illustrate the ‘Dance of Death’ and which appear to be telling us that we only have a limited amount of time to “awaken” and understand our present condition, the condition of our planet and our place in the universe.

Gary Osborn.

March 21st, 2006.

Gary Osborn is co-author with Philip Gardiner on the book The Serpent Grail (Watkins 2005) and The Shining Ones (Watkins 2006).

Gary Osborn’s Official Website:

http://garyosborn.moonfruit.com/

Presentations associated with this article – especially ‘23.5 Degrees’ – can be read here

http://garyosborn.moonfruit.com/revelations

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

The Truth Behind The Da Vinci Code

The Secret Code - The Truth Behind the Da Vinci Code

by Philip Gardiner, best selling author of The Shining Ones, The Serpent Grail, Proof - Does God Exist? and Gnosis: The Secret of Solomon’s Temple Revealed, also member of The Book of THoTH Website.

The Da Vinci Code and the madness that surrounds it is indicative of one thing – the fact that in the 21st century mankind is still in the dark about a great many things.

We may have sent rockets into space; we may be able to develop nano-technology and we can even heat up food with micro-wave radiation, but we are still no closer to the truth about our own religions and the secretive organisations that surround them.

The most powerful of them all is of course the Catholic Church and it is this Empire building religion that lies at the heart of the book. To begin with we do need to take a look at the claims made in the Da Vinci Code in relationship to the Holy Grail in-order to understand what the reality of the matter really is.

The Da Vinci Code Fiasco

One question regarding the Holy Grail that the early medieval writers asked was "who does it serve?" Well, let’s have a look at the current Grail world and see if it is serving us, or are we serving it?

Very briefly and for those among us who have been on the planet Sanity for the last few of years, the Da Vinci Code is a fiction based around a man who discovers a code that reveals the true identity of the Holy Grail to be nothing more than the very bloodline of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene.

Unfortunately the author, Dan Brown, claimed his now infamous book to be based upon real factual organisations and events. This however could not be farther from the truth.

Lets take it apart starting with the:

Priory of Sion

This supposedly ancient and enigmatic group allegedly once had Leonardo da Vinci himself as a Grand Master, not to mention several other notables such as Nicolas Flamel and Isaac Newton. However, there is no truth in it at all. Sion was the name of a hill nearby the residences of Pierre Plantard and Gerade de Sede – two of the original creators of the Priory of Sion hoax.

The documents of the Priory secreted in the Biblioteque Nationale in Paris have been proven to be forgeries. In fact the only truthful copies of anything for Mr Plantard in the Paris Library are newsletters from the 1950’s for a rather boring housing association, complaining about the state of the streets, and even this is in extremely poor French.

All the instigators of this surrealist hoax have admitted their creation on record. On the one hand they said it was a surrealist joke and on the other a kind of egotistical ploy to be accepted by society. And yet the world still goes mad with every new bloodline myth.

Sang Real

One of the main pieces of evidence for the books about the bloodline of Christ, from Holy Blood, Holy Grail to The Templar Revelation has been the interpretation of the original term used for the Holy Grail - San Graal. In the 80’s book, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, by Michael Baigent et al, we find that they interpret this differently, placing the g from graal onto the end of san, making sang real. This then translates as royal or holy blood. Mistaking a simple error by a 15th century writer - the only ever time the error was made until the 1980’s - they based an entire theory upon something that was simply not true. Sir Walter Skeat, one of the greatest etymologists England has ever created even said a hundred years ago that this error was "very early falsified" and for what ends he did not know. He pointed out that in fact the original concept meant mixing bowl, which of course relates entirely with the theory I put forward in The Serpent Grail.

Leonardo da Vinci

So, now that we know the true etymology of san graal and that the Priory of Sion never in fact existed, we should also know that Leonardo could not have been a grand master of a none existing order that protected a secret that also didn‘t exist.

In fact, all the historical background and information on Leonardo reveals that he was a skilled and wonderful artist - so no great revelation there then.

However, there are those strange elements of his paintings, which the Da Vinci Code and others pick up on. Take the female looking character in the Last Supper for instance. Many have pointed to the fact that this individual looks remarkably feminine. Well, he does. Others have pointed to the Mona Lisa as being not quite feminine enough and that surely the sitter must have been a boy. Using these assumptions many have claimed that Leonardo was therefore homosexual. It is more and more amusing by the day just how far this rubber band can be stretched, before it comes hurtling back and hits somebody in the face.

So what is the truth? Is that a lady in the Last Supper? No.

There was a tradition of painting the disciple that Christ loved, John the Evangelist, as a slightly boyish individual, thereby bringing questions to the mind of many as to whether Jesus himself was gay. In fact I discovered this to be part of an ancient Gnostic tradition whereby the two Johns, John the Baptist and John the Evangelist, were two sides to the duality – male and female, positive and negative, which needed to be rejoined in-order to be complete. Therefore John the Evangelist was perceived as the feminine principle in this relation, whereas John the Baptist was the manly bearded wild figure.

It was also part of the hidden tradition of the painter’s guild of the time to include androgynous elements within their paintings for this very reason. This androgynous element is there as a symbol of the the union of opposites mentioned before, of man and woman, of male and female, of the two sides of our mind which need bringing into union once again to form the perfect human.

Did Jesus and Mary marry and have children?

Who would have thought that such a simple question would raise such a controversy and even be taken seriously? To answer this one we need to break it down.

Firstly, if Jesus married Mary Magdalene then we have to admit that Jesus and Mary existed in the first place. Although we have a substantial amount of textual evidence for these biblical characters, this is due to the sheer amount of copying being carried out hundreds of years after the supposed event. We have no actual texts naming either character from the period, most of the texts date hundreds of years after.

Even if we do admit that these people were real, then we would have to admit that Jesus did walk on water, cast out demons into pigs and die and resurrect. That, or we would have another option: That the character of Jesus, just like that of Robin Hood and King Arthur, was based upon a real man somewhere and all the extra mythical and mystical elements were added into the story. Just as Robin married Marion (Mary) and Arthur married Guinevere, so too in this way - that is mythical - Jesus may have married Mary - even though there is no textual evidence for this.

Both Marion and Mary are the same and imply water and wisdom. Guinevere comes from similar roots especially as the queen of heaven, which was a title for Mary the Mother of Jesus and Isis the Mother of Horus- and as many scholars have pointed out the two Mary’s may in fact be amalgamations of a much older myth.

Guinevere is also the ‘queen of serpents’ and therefore knowledge and wisdom and her name is related in etymology to Eve which means female serpent and is an indication of wisdom.

Just as the early Christian church was forming groups such as the Gnostic Ophites or serpent worshippers, raising their communion cup to the good serpent they were also splitting the threefold mother goddess - Mary - into distinct parts. First the Mother Mary, then the Sister Mary and then Mary Magdalene, a mysterious element and we shall see why.

Mary the mother is Isis the mother of Horus. As Horus is the son and in fact reincarnation of Osiris, so Isis or Mary is also his sister and lover. She is all three, the feminine trinity. Mary Magdalene therefore is the hidden lover of Jesus who is both God and the Son of God, just like Horus. And all of this mystery tradition relates back to the ancient serpent cult as Isis, Osiris and Horus had strong associations with the creative, wise and immortal serpent. The same feminine trinity can in fact also be found in Celtic myth and even India with Kali.

Jesus was eventually likened to the Mosaic "brazen serpent in the wilderness" and imaged hundreds of times as a serpent upon the cross. Here we have that parallel with Arthur, whose name, Pendragon, means "head serpent" or "head of the serpent."

Now that we can see with just these few examples there is a real code afoot. An ancient code going right back into ancient Egypt and beyond, through Osiris and Isis and to Enki and Ninkhursag in Sumeria and Mesopotamia who were known themselves as serpent priests or doctors.

But what is this code telling us?

Simply that in-order to give birth to our own messiah or anointing, or in-order to save ourselves, we need to be in union with wisdom, which is symbolized as both water and the serpent - hence Arthur Pendragon and his wife the Queen of Serpents, or the early Enki and Ninkhursag, who were serpent deities or Shining Ones and were therefore symbols of enlightenment.

As God was upon the face of the waters of the deep in Genesis, so too must we submerge ourselves in wisdom in-order to bring about the divine creation within us.

So, now we understand that Jesus and Mary in union could be a metaphor or indeed a copy of this ancient system, what are we left with?

The truth of the Da Vinci Code is in fact more real than people know. Jesus and Mary did marry, in the Gnostic sense and not the literal sense. They did spawn a child and he was known simply as Gnosis. However, the evil twin brother known as Catholicism tried to wipe him out, like Set tried to destroy Osiris, or Mordred killed Arthur or the Sheriff of Nottingham killed Robin. In the end Set, Mordred and the Sheriff were themselves brought down, so what will be the verdict on the Catholic Church?

This hidden truth behind the veil of the literal Christianity hides the real truth of the Holy Grail, that it, like alchemy, is a work on the self. The question now is, who does it serve?

Well, one thing we do know, the organisations spoken of in the Da Vinci Code, such as the Jesuits and the Opus Dei, have indeed tried to keep this self empowering truth from mankind. The reason for this is simple, with the knowledge of our own god-head we no longer need a priest or a church and so they lose wealth and power. Let’s take a look at some of these organisations and see just what they have been up to.

The Society of Jesus or Jesuits was founded in 1540 by St. Ignatius Loyola and since then has grown from the original seven to nearly 30000 members who work out of nearly 2000 houses in over 100 countries. According to J. Parnell McCarter in his Puritan News Service, Ignatius was himself a Gnostic illuminist – a member of the Alumbrados of Spain, his home. These Alumbrados were quite simply the Spanish version of the infamous Illuminati – bringing full circle the Jesuits being created by an Illuminati and then going on to create an Illuminati. All of this was occurring at the same time as the rise in Freemasonic thought.

What is known about Ignatius is that he was a Spanish Basque soldier who then supposedly underwent an extraordinary conversion while recuperating from a broken leg. His experiences were written down and he called them Spiritual Exercises, going on later to found the Society of Jesus or Jesuits with the approval of Pope Paul III in 1540. Strangely upon the printing of his Spiritual Exercises in 1548 he was brought before the Inquisition, but was later released.

According to the Catholic Church the Jesuits have become renowned for their sanctity, which basically means that they have had many members Canonised or Blessed. They have been involved in many scientific discoveries and in the exploration or indeed exploitation of the New World.

From the start the Pope was overwhelmed with the Jesuit service, becoming his secret police, collector of information and general bully-boys, much akin to the history of the Alumbrados (Illuminated Ones.) On the face of it the Jesuits were opening schools, making amazing discoveries and sending missionaries out across the world. In fact it is claimed by the Catholic Church that no Order has ever had so many martyrs. However all this reveals is simply how far they pushed and how close to danger they always were. Stamping out a culture or pagan religion often brings dangers and martyrdom.

The skill of Ignatius Loyola was in the gathering around him of an energetic band of well-educated and determined men. Ignatius had the concept of supplying the Church with missionaries such as Francis Xavier, who would preach and administer the sacraments, whilst growing the Church’s membership and gathering huge amounts of information.

Ignatius soon discovered that colleges and universities offered the greatest service to the church, for by and through religious instruction, the Jesuits could manipulate the thinkers in addition to the masses manipulated in church on a Sunday.

These Jesuit schools of learning sprang up everywhere and became an influential part of Catholic reform called "a rebirth of the infant church". So influential were the Jesuits that they threatened the Royalty and they were "asked to leave" several countries.

To see just how influential the Jesuits have been we need to look at what the Catholic Church claim on their behalf.

By 1750, 30 of the world’s 130 astronomical observatories were run by Jesuit astronomers and indeed 35 lunar craters have been named to honour Jesuit scientists.

The "Gregorian" Calendar instigated by the Jesuit Christopher Clavius, sometimes called the "most influential teacher of the Renaissance".

Ferdinand Verbiest, a Jesuit, worked out the Russo-Chinese border and according to the Catholics until recent times no foreign name was as well known in China as the Jesuit Matteo Ricci, "Li-ma-teu".

Five of the major rivers of the world were first charted by Jesuit explorers; two of the statues in the Washington are Jesuits; the Jesuits founded Sao Paulo; Spanish Jesuits built settlements in Paraguay which lasted from 1607 to 1767; they taught agriculture, architecture, metallurgy, farming, music, ranching and printing to the indigenous people of each country the occupied – how better to build wealth.

In 1773 Pope Clement XIV yielded to Bourbon pressure and reduced the power of the Jesuits on the surface. The Jesuits followed orders and disbanded temporarily until 1814 when they were brought back together again. Like the Knights Templar before them the Jesuits simply assumed other roles. As if to prove that the Jesuits were ultimately obedient to the Pope in 1590 Pope Sixtus V wanted to take out the name Jesus from the official name of the society, to which the Jesuits duly complied – although Sixtus then surprisingly died – the questions arise who killed him and does this really show obedience to the Pope?

Today the Jesuits are back in force, with schools, colleges and universities across the world. At any one time they are educating over half a million people. Ex-President Mitterand of France was himself a Jesuit and it was he who instigated the infamous pyramid of light at the Louvre in Paris.

There is a subtle undercurrent running beneath the cover of this Catholic Order – it is a current of illumination now bastardised as a secret truth and hidden from our eyes by the clever manipulating of religion for the masses. But they also have links in the world of commerce and politics.

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Out Of Body Experiences

An out-of-body experience is where you have experiences in which your soul leaves the physical body. Your soul being within your astral body form can travel anywhere. This experience is also known as astral projection; soul flight; exteriorization; OBE, and astral travel.

This is a part of human experiences through all cultures and history. The out-of-body experience has been recorded for all to understand and work with if one chooses to do so. These occurrences have been reported in varied situations; housewives, doctors, Egyptian scrolls, Africa, China, Europe, to name a few.

This experience is not influenced by religious belief as observed by the different cultural backgrounds of the people involved. Out-of –body travel can be spontaneous or preplanned, conscious or subconscious. There are some basic ways to spot an out-of-body experience:

First >Your astral body is fully aware on all your sensory levels. You can perceive the environment you re in and fully remember upon going back to your physical body. There isn’t any doubt about having the experience. You can remember details and check on them if they are in your time period or in the past.

Second >At the same time the physical body looks as though asleep or in the death state, your “real” self is not within the physical shell at the time.

Third >The two bodies are connected by what is termed as the “silver cord.” The silver cord is an ethereal cord or cable of energy which has elastic properties, thus enabling you to travel unlimited distances. This cord may be able to be perceived by psychics.

Fourth >During out-of-body travel the astral body can go anywhere on this planet or on foreign planes to any location.

Fifth >Also, it is not limited to time.

Sixth >The amount of time you are out-of-body can be either pre-programmed or automatic. You would feel more refreshed upon coming back to your awakened state. This experience has a long-term effect on the individual. The reason being that once you have experienced this state, you will no longer have any doubts about the death experience as being final.

You will be aware that your physical body is not “everything,” thus, there are other states/planes available to your soul. You will be aware that your physical body is not as limited as you imagined. You “know” there is an immortal soul that is you.

Everyone has heard of out-of-body experiences in those who are very ill or in an accident. We do not always hear of those who did not have the experience due to something traumatic. Psychically at times, the astral body can be perceived, so if you are out-of-body at a destination where there is a person sensitive to you on this level, you will most likely be aware of being recognized. Sometimes the information you bring back can be from the future, in which case you may have a better way of dealing with the situation when it occurs or can prevent it if, for example, if it is an accident.

You need to remember that if you choose to consciously astral travel, to utilize a psychic self-defense method. This is to make sure everything will stay on a positive and safe level. (You can utilize mine or someone else’s’ method.)

Out-of-body experiences have been part of our heritage as men and women. We need only to be aware of it and consciously utilize this ability for positive purposes if choosing to develop it.

Always remember you are one with Divine Power.

May God Bless You Abundantly!

About the Author

Rev. Maria Solomon, MsD, D.D., DRH, born in Budapest, Hungary is a professional Psychic/Metaphysician since the early 1960s. As a speaker, she has conducted numerous lectures and seminars for over twenty years. Currently Rev. Maria Solomon lives on Long Island, New York. For further information see website – www.mariasolomon.com

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Beating The Diabetes Epidemic

Nearly 21 million Americans are believed to be diabetic, according to the Centers for Disease Control, and 41 million more are prediabetic -- their blood sugar is high and could reach the diabetic level if they do not alter their living habits. Nationwide, the disease's cost for 2002 -- from medical bills to disability payments and lost workdays -- was conservatively estimated by the American Diabetes Association at $132 billion. All cancers, taken together, cost the country about $171 billion a year.

The disease could actually lower the average life expectancy of Americans for the first time in more than a century. According to the CDC, one in three children born in the United States five years ago are expected to become diabetic in their lifetime, and a child found to have Type 2 diabetes at age 10 will see his or her life shortened by 19 years.

''Either we fall apart or we stop this,'' said Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. 'I will go out on a limb,'' he said, ''and say, 20 years from now people will look back and say: 'What were they thinking? They're in the middle of an epidemic and kids are watching 20,000 hours of commercials for junk food.' ''

According to the Office of Minority Health and the American Diabetes Association, the threat of diabetes is related to ethnicity and economic class. African Americans are more than twice as likely to be diagnosed with diabetes as non-Hispanic whites. One in every four African-American women over 55 has diabetes. And African Americans are 2.1 times more likely as non-Hispanic whites to die from diabetes.

Similar trends are true for Hispanics who, on average, are 1.7 times as likely to have diabetes as whites, and for American Indians and Alaska Natives, who are 2.2 times as likely as non-Hispanic whites of similar age to have diabetes.

Type 2 (adult onset) diabetes, which accounts for about 90 percent of all diabetics, is pretty clearly a disease of diet and lifestyle. And that's the good news. According to Neal Barnard, M.D. and founder and president of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), a change in diet can not only prevent the onset of Type 2 diabetes, but can reverse the disease and even get some Type 2 diabetics off insulin.

NEAL BARNARD, M.D., is the author of several books:Eat Right, Live Longer; Food for Life; and his latest, Dr. Neal Barnard's Program for Reversing Diabetes: The Scientifically Proven System for Reversing Diabetes Without Drugs.

Terrence McNally: Is it safe to say that lifestyle, nutrition, and prevention were not the cornerstones of medical education when you were in med school?

Neal Barnard: Well, not only were those things neglected in medical school, they were completely neglected in my personal life. I grew up in Fargo, North Dakota. My grandfather was a cattle rancher. My father grew up on a cattle ranch, and all my uncles and cousins are still in that business. I think I ate roast beef, baked potatoes and corn every day of my life -- except for special occasions, when it was roast beef, baked potatoes and peas.

When I went to medical school, we learned a great deal about how to diagnose conditions, how to manage them medically, and how to prescribe drugs. Unfortunately, one thing we did not pay much attention to was how to prevent conditions like cancer or heart disease. The number one thing when it comes to preventing illness is what we eat. Diet plays a more substantial role than smoking for most major cancers. But with regard to public awareness, even among physicians, with diet we're now where we were in about 1940 with tobacco. People have inklings -- "maybe I should do something..." -- but no one is doing much about it.

When people finally figured out that tobacco caused lung cancer, they got serious and took action -- not only individually but as businesses, as schools, and as a country. I'm optimistic. I think we're on the cusp of making a major diet change.

McNally: John Robbins in Reclaiming Our Health quotes a startling statistic: Medical students were asked how important nutrition was to health, first as they entered medical school and again when they graduated. At graduation, the number who felt it was an important factor had fallen by about half.

Barnard: Not just during medical school but also afterwards. All doctors need to have continuing medical education in order to keep their hospital privileges. It's rather expensive, and regrettably the drug companies have absolutely cornered that market.

I'm not saying that there's not a role for pharmaceuticals. There is. But that should be our alternative medicine. Mainstream medicine should deal with what's causing the illness in the first place. If it's your diet, let's change that. If that is not enough, then let's add medications.

We've got a ways to go, but the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine aims to change that emphasis. We advocate for preventive medicine, good nutrition, more sensible and more ethical research. My hope is that we'll be able to change the face of medicine.

McNally: How would you describe prevention?

Barnard: I think of prevention simply as not getting the diseases that would otherwise be in our future. Others get more sophisticated about it, and say there's secondary prevention and tertiary prevention, meaning once you've already got the disease, can we stop recurrence or can we stop the complications of it.

I have an ambitious goal: Let's preserve the very best of health for as long as we can. If you look at kids today, kids 12, 13, 14 years of age, they don't yet have heart disease so far as they're aware. They don't yet have cancer. They don't yet have diabetes in most cases, although some do. If we intervene with their diets now, we can spare them a miserable future. If we fail to do that, we condemn them.

We need to do more than change the face of medicine. We need to change our culture, and we need to change the way our government deals with nutritional issues and prevention. Right now we have a federal government that, on the one hand, says eat more fruits and vegetables and reduce fat in your diet. On the other hand, there are active programs to promote the consumption of meat and dairy products. Subsidies for meat and dairy are dramatically higher than subsidies for fruits and vegetables.

So confronting all those economic pressures that keep cholesterol on our plates, we've got a big challenge in front of us. But I believe we can do it, frankly, for this reason: People know there's a problem and they're sick of it. If you have a family member who's dealing with weight problems or who has diabetes, it's thankless. People have tried all kinds of solutions, they know that we need a bigger picture, and I think that's where we're going.

McNally: The food industry now admits there are problems, but claims it just wants people to make their own choices. They say the answer is public education, so those choices can be informed. Let's be serious. Nutrition education, if it were robust, might be $100 million, while billions are spent on an opposing form of education -- known as commercials.

Barnard: Every day you can flip on the evening news and half the commercials are for snack foods and fast food restaurants. The other half are for medications to undo the effects of our bad diet. That's the culture we're in. Just to make it explicit: This is not entirely the government's fault, though the government I think supports it.

In the early parts of the 20th century people had lung cancer, and it was unclear why. As time went on, people suspected that tobacco may be the reason. The tobacco industry said, "No way. Tobacco's good for you." You can see commercials and advertisements from not that long ago where doctors would say a particular brand of cigarettes was healthy.

Nowadays we have many forms of cancer, we have heart disease, diabetes and hypertension. I am suggesting that these do not occur primarily due to genetics, bad luck or stress. The main contributor to all of these is what we're dosing our bodies with three times a day.

If you look at Asian countries where meat is not the staple of their diet, where their staple is rice, there's very little cancer, very little diabetes. But if they move to Los Angeles or Chicago or Washington DC, stop eating rice and start eating cheeseburgers or fried chicken -- the rate of diabetes goes up 400 percent and cancer rates explode. Or they can stay in Japan and MacDonald's comes to them. An affluent woman in Japan who has Westernized her diet has nine times the breast cancer risk of a poor woman living nearby who has not abandoned rice and vegetables.

If you go back to the Great Depression or before -- and frankly for much of our sojourn on earth -- people couldn't afford to eat meat twice or three times a day. We ate beans and vegetables and fruits and things, much of it coming from our own gardens. Nowadays, for whatever reason, our culture has allowed us to have bacon and eggs for breakfast, baloney sandwiches for lunch, and fried chicken for dinner. And we are paying a terrible price.

McNally: Briefly what's the current state of things with regard to obesity and diabetes? Are things getting better or worse?

Barnard: Things are getting worse. Some recent statistics: in 1994, fewer than 5 percent of the California population had diabetes. Fast-forward ten years, to 2004. We're up to over 7 percent now, and the Centers for Disease Control say one out of every three kids born today will develop diabetes in their lifetime -- one in three.

Diabetes is the leading cause of blindness, a leading cause of amputations, a leading cause of loss of kidney function. It can take 10 years off your life if things don't go well -- which they normally don't. Three quarters of people with this disease die prematurely of a heart attack.

People come into my office with a sack full of medicines. Typically two for diabetes, one for cholesterol, two or three for blood pressure, plus others. It adds up to anywhere from $2,000-$5000 per person. Multiply that by the 20 million or so Americans who've got the disease, and you can see why it's bankrupting us.

McNally: What's the difference between type 1 and type 2 diabetes?

Barnard: In diabetes, the main problem is that there's too much sugar in the blood. Sugar is supposed to get into the cells to power your muscle cells, power your brain cells. Insulin is a hormone made in the pancreas that travels in the bloodstream to the cell's surface. It's like a key that opens up little doors to let the blood sugar inside.

In type 1 diabetes, what used to be called childhood onset, the insulin is not made any more, the pancreatic cells to make it are dead. Some people believe that early exposure to cow's milk proteins triggers an allergic reaction that causes antibodies to be formed that wipe out those cells.

McNally: Only in a small percentage of people?

Barnard: That's a leading theory. Researchers are still trying to tease out the different causes. Viruses may play a role as well. You seem to need a genetic predisposition to it, but the genes aren't determinate. If one identical twin has type 1 diabetes, usually the other one will not. So we're still sorting it out.

Ninety percent of diabetes is type 2, the adult onset form that's on the rise because of diet and lifestyle. These people have insulin in their body, but when the insulin key arrives at the cell and tries to open up the doors, it can't do it. It's as if somebody has gummed up the lock.

McNally: Haven't people used diet for a while? What's radically different about your approach?

Barnard: Anybody who's been on a typical diabetes diet knows it's an exercise in drudgery, and not very effective. The old approach says, "You can't handle sugar." Sugar's building up in the blood, so don't eat sugar and don't eat anything like white bread or potatoes that digests to sugar in the body. With that approach, people on a diabetes diet carefully monitor their carbohydrate intake, counting up carbohydrate grams. In most cases, they need to lose weight, so the diet says go to bed a little hungry to knock 500 calories a day off your diet. By Wednesday that gets very old.

Our muscle cells, however, are powered by sugar and glucose. Marathon runners carbo-load before a race, trying to increase the amount of sugar stored in their muscles and in their liver. But tiny little droplets of fat have accumulated inside the muscle of a person with type 2 diabetes. So insulin arrives in the blood, like a key, it goes into the lock, trying to open up the doors -- but there is so much fat inside the cell that the insulin signaling cannot take place.

We had some insights that allowed us to change the dietary approach to one that is easier and dramatically more effective. It starts with observations. As I mentioned, people on plant-based diets have relatively little diabetes. When they up their fat content they get more diabetes. Vegetarians have much less diabetes compared to meat eaters.

The diet we use says, "Okay, let's not worry so much about carbohydrate, let's take the fat out of your diet." It's not low-carb; it's a vegan diet. Now vegans are not people from the planet Vegas. A vegan diet means no animal products at all -- no chicken, no fish, no dairy, no eggs, and zero animal fat. Step two, keep the oils low. People who take olive oil all over their salad and their pasta, are learning how to use non fat dressings and cooking methods. Step three, we take the sugar out of the diet.

McNally: And you've clinically tested your approach?

Barnard: Our most recent study, starting in 2003 and finishing last year, was funded by the National Institutes of Health and published by the American Diabetes Association. Among those people where everything stayed absolutely constant -- their medicines didn't change, their exercise didn't change -- this new diet was three times more powerful than the current American Diabetes Association diet.

In fact, it was more powerful than any of the oral medicines that people with diabetes use. Individuals with diabetes in our study lost weight dramatically and easily, even though we weren't telling them to count calories. Their cholesterol levels fell, their symptoms improved, they felt better, and many of them got off their medicines or reduced their dosage.

McNally: A positive side effect: The environmental benefits when you stop buying from the poultry and meat industries are phenomenal.

Barnard: When I talk to a lot of younger audiences, they can't picture having diabetes or prostate cancer or arteriosclerosis because they're animal activists or environmentalists.

Americans now eat a million animals per hour -- mostly chickens. Americans now have this tremendous appetite for chicken, naively imagining chicken is somehow a health food, which it's clearly not. Chicken has chicken fat in it. The leanest beef that my Uncle Harold can raise is about 29 percent fat, as a percentage of calories. The leanest chicken, even without the skin, is about 23 percent fat. A bean is about 4 percent.

We have 100 million belching cows on the North American continent. People talk about global warming. There's a lot you can do, but the first thing by all means is retire those cows.

McNally: It's not just the methane they're putting out, it's also the enormous amounts of waste that pollute the water.

So to prevent diabetes, your prescription is stop eating meat and dairy?

Barnard: Avoid animal products completely -- meat, eggs and dairy, even skimmed milk. We are very clear, I can't reverse your diabetes or improve it if you continue to eat poultry and fish.

McNally: But don't we need some of the fats in fish and fish oil?

Barnard: Chinook salmon is about 50 percent fat, and people will say, "It's all good fat." Here's the bad news, I'm going to have to prescribe Prozac to everyone after I tell them this, because they're going to be so depressed. Yes, there are good fats in fish, the omega three fatty acids, for example, which reduce inflammation. But there's also a lot of bad fat in fish. About 15-30 percent of the fat in fish is plain old saturated fat.

McNally: People who avoid all fat miss some elements essential for brain development, etc., don't they? Where does that come from in your diet?

Barnard: There's not a lot of fat in vegetables, beans and fruits, but what there is, is heavily weighted toward omega three. If you want a little extra you can get it from walnut or flax, but I'm not sure anyone really needs that. A man whose grandfather died at age 30 came into our study at 31 when he was diagnosed with diabetes. We didn't tell him to count calories; we didn't tell him to say no to extra portions. He just did vegan, low fat, low sugar. He lost 60 pounds in a year, and in the course of the study his blood sugar values returned absolutely to normal. His doctors stopped all of his diabetes medications. His erectile dysfunction went away. He said, "Why didn't I do this diet 20 years ago?" He never would have had diabetes in all likelihood, had he been on this diet as a child.

McNally: Are people able to comply with this diet? Probably the reason they have diabetes and obesity is because they're eating a fast food diet. When they make that huge switch, how does it go?

Barnard: It goes terrific. Everybody has exactly that question: Can I do it? It sounds extreme, but it's like sticking your toe in a swimming pool. It feels a little cold, but once you jump in, you're going to love it. It beats the socks off continuing to carry that extra weight.

We have some online support for people at the Web site, pcrm.org. We have Q&A and we have a weekly live video conference support group that you can join.

People enjoy it. Start your breakfast with a big bowl of oatmeal. Have a bean burrito instead of that meat taco for lunch. At dinner top your pasta with a marinara sauce instead of the Alfredo. Easy as that and your body starts to heal.

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Labels: , , , , , ,

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

The Fantastic Secrets Of Nikola Tesla (Video)

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Steven Greer Disclosure Project Video

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

The Benefits Of A Vegetarian Diet

The report released this week by the world's leading climate scientists made no bones about it: Global warming is happening in a big way and it is very likely manmade. The U.N. report that came out soon after made a critical point: "The livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global." And yet, so many environmentalists continue to eat meat. Why?

Being part of the solution can be a whole lot simpler -- and cheaper -- than going out and buying a new hybrid. We can make a huge difference in the environment simply by eating a plant-based diet instead of an animal-based one. Factory farming pollutes our air and water, reduces the rainforests, and goes a long way to create global warming. Yet for some environmentalists, the idea of giving up those chicken nuggets is still hard to swallow.

So, I thought I might discuss a few of the key concerns that my meat-eating friends offer in defense of their continued meat consumption. Here we go:

Some were worried about thriving, physically, on a vegetarian diet.

Now this just does not make sense. Half of all Americans die of heart disease or cancer and two-thirds of us are overweight. The American Dietetic Association says that vegetarians have "lower rates of death from ischemic heart disease; ... lower blood cholesterol levels, lower blood pressure, and lower rates of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and prostate and colon cancer." Vegetarians, on average, are about one-third as likely to be overweight as meat eaters.

And I've just learned from the brilliant Dr. Andrew Weil that there is something called arachidonic acid, or AA, in animal flesh that causes inflammation. AA is a pro-inflammatory fatty acid. He explains that "heart disease and Alzheimer's -- among many other diseases -- begin as inflammatory processes. The same hormonal imbalance that increases inflammation increases cell proliferation and the risk of malignant transformation." They are finding out that inflammation is key in so many of the diseases that plague us. So when you eat meat, you ingest AA, which causes inflammation, which fires up the disease process. It doesn't matter if the chicken is free range or the beef is grass-fed because the fatty acid is natural and inherent in the meat.

As for having strength and energy on a vegetarian diet, some of the world's top athletes are vegetarian. A few examples: Carl Lewis (perhaps the greatest Olympian of all time), Robert Parish (one of the "50 Greatest Players in NBA History"), Desmond Howard (Heisman Trophy winner and Super Bowl MVP), Bill Pearl (professional bodybuilder and four-time Mr. Universe), Jack La Lanne (Mr. Fitness himself) and Chris Evert (tennis champion). Vegetarian athletes have the advantage of getting all the plant protein, complex carbohydrates and fiber they need without all the artery-clogging cholesterol and saturated animal fats found in meat that would slow them down. In fact, Carl Lewis says that "my best year of track competition was the first year I ate a vegan diet."

One person pointed out that the rain forest is being cut down to grow soy, not meat.

Actually, much of the rain forest is being chopped down for grazing, but also yes, the rain forest is being chopped down to grow soy -- but not for human consumption. Americans and Europeans can't raise all the feed domestically that is needed to sustain their meat addictions, so agribusiness has started cutting down the rain forest. Ask Greenpeace or any other environmental group, and they'll tell you that the overwhelming majority of soy (or corn or wheat, for that matter) is used to feed animals in factory farms. In fact, Greenpeace recently unveiled a massive banner over an Amazon soy field that read, "KFC-Amazon Criminal," to accentuate the point that large chicken and other meat companies like KFC are responsible for the destruction of the Amazon. It takes many pounds of soy or other plant foods to produce just one pound of animal flesh -- so if you're worried about the rain forests being chopped down for grazing or to grow soy, your best move is to stop eating chickens, pigs and other animals. If more people went vegetarian, we would need far less land to feed people, and we wouldn't have to destroy the few natural places that this world has left.

Some wondered about humane, organic or kosher meat.

Sadly, most of the meat, egg and dairy companies that pretend to be eco- or animal-friendly, with packages covered in pictures of pretty red barnyards, are basically the same massive corporately owned factory farms but with a newly hired advertising consultant. In fact, labels like "Swine Welfare" and "UEP Certified" are simply the industry labels that attempt to hide the horrible abuse involved in these products' production. And even "organic" farms are industrializing in ways that shock the journalists who bother to investigate. Sadly, "kosher" means nothing when it comes to how animals are treated on farms, and the largest kosher slaughterhouse in North America was caught horribly abusing animals -- ripping the tracheas out of live cows' throats and worse -- and defending the abuse as kosher.

All that said, it's undeniable that the rare meat eater who limits himself or herself to a bit of grass-fed cattle flesh on occasion is making a much smaller environmental impact than the vast majority of Americans. But when you consider that no reputable scientific or medical body believes that eating animals is good for us, let alone necessary, one has to wonder about environmentalists who insist on consuming products that we know to be resource-intensive and polluting (even if they're less resource intensive and polluting than some other similar options or eaten in "moderation"). It'd be like driving an SUV that gets 15 mpg rather than 10, or driving an SUV three days per week instead of seven. Sure, it might be better for the environment, but with so many more fuel-efficient ways to get from A to B, there's no need to drive any SUV at all. Eating meat -- any meat -- is the same thing: With so many healthy vegetarian options that are kinder and far more eco-friendly than even the "best" meat products, there's just no good justification for someone who claims to be an environmentalist -- or to oppose cruelty -- for doing it.

Some worry about "preachy" or "judgmental" or "extreme" vegetarians.

And some consider the very choice to be a vegetarian to be extreme. Although I certainly don't like radical in-your-face messages, the truth is that, sometimes, it's the only thing that seems to wrench us out of our slumber. I know it worked with me when I saw one of the slaughterhouse videos -- definitely not pleasant, but it got my attention.

The very nature of progressive movements throughout history is to tell others to stop doing something harmful or degrading (e.g., using humans as slaves, sexually harassing women, forcing children to work in sweatshops, harming the environment, etc). Yes, the abolitionists, suffragists, feminists, and civil rights activists were called extreme, and similarly, some vegetarians are called extreme. But maybe it's just because vegetarianism is not yet a cultural norm. Old habits -- and appetites -- die hard, and there is usually a lot of resistance before things change. I'm a southern gal, and I loved my chicken fried steak like no other. I didn't want to give up the joys of Sunday barbecue or chicken wings with my friends on a Friday night. I get it; I understand.

But still, if we are to continue evolving -- physically, emotionally, and spiritually -- we really do have to look at how our dinner choices affect not only the environment but, even more importantly, the well-being (or intense suffering) of other creatures. So yes, on the one hand, the move to eating a plant-based diet may look extreme because most people don't do it. But on the other hand, we can still have our barbecued (soy dogs and veggie burgers) and feel good about it.

I do feel strongly that vegetarians should not play into the self-righteous stereotypes, that we should not be shrill or judgmental, of course, but that doesn't require silence; it simply requires patience and decorum.

A few people asked about meat in the developing world, or meat for Eskimos or Inuit.

If you are an Eskimo, or you're living in sub-Saharan Africa and you're reading this blog, I'm not going to begrudge you your pound of flesh; it would be silly of me to do so. But if you're reading this in a developed country where almost all animals are eating animal feed rather than grazing, are factory-farmed rather than living with families or hunted, and you have abundant vegetarian options all around you, talk of people who have limited food options doesn't apply to you.

Some people worried that it's hard to be a vegetarian.

Being vegetarian isn't exactly the supreme sacrifice -- surfing around the food pics on any vegetarian cooking site will show you that. Vegetarian and vegan food is everywhere (even Burger King has a veggie burger!). Most, if not all, major grocery stores carry soy milk, mock meats ("chicken" nuggets, BBQ "ribs," burgers, soy "sausage," etc.), vegan cheeses, and soy ice cream. If you can't find what you want at the store, most will order it for you. Many restaurants have veggie options a-plenty (especially Thai, Indian, Ethiopian, Mexican and other ethnic restaurants, which are my favorite anyway). Sure, some vegetarians may prefer not to eat food that was cooked on the same grill as meat, but I'm not concerned about that (it does not cause more animals to suffer or more environmental harm). You can find great vegetarian recipes at www.VegCooking.com.

I'd also like to address the top five most common things that I hear from meat eaters regarding their meat consumption:

Number five: "Humans have always eaten animals -- it's natural."

First, our evolution in human morality is marked almost entirely by our attempt to move beyond the "might makes right" law of the jungle. It may indeed be "natural" for the powerful to dominate the weak, but that doesn't mean we should support it.

Second, human bodies don't require meat to be healthy -- quite the opposite. Animal flesh contains cholesterol and saturated fat, which are hard on our bodies. We may have had a need to eat meat thousands of years ago, in times of scarcity as hunter-gatherers, but we don't need to now, and we'll be better off if we don't. Check out this essay by Dr. Milton Mills for more information on the issue of whether the human physiology is designed for meat consumption.

Most critically, the people who say this generally use it to justify buying the same old meat that comes from giant, wholly unnatural factory farms where animals are crammed into filthy sheds or cages and not allowed to do anything natural to them -- at all, ever (breathe fresh air, bask in the sun, raise their young, dust-bathe, form social orders, etc.). Chickens in the egg industry have half their beaks cut off, piglets in the pork industry have their tails cut off, etc. (Please take 10 minutes to watch the video at a href="http://www.meat.org">www.Meat.org.) This is how 99 percent of chickens and turkeys, 95 percent of pigs and eggs, and most cow flesh and dairy products end up on our plates.

Lastly, if you care so much about being "natural," then think for a moment about the harm that you're doing to your natural environment by eating meat -- any meat. At the end of the day, for me, we don't need to eat meat, we'll be better off without it, and it causes animals to suffer.

Number four: "Animals are not equal to humans, so we should not be so concerned about them."

I disagree with Princeton professor Peter Singer on many issues, but on this one I think he gets it precisely right. Writes Dr. Singer, "[W]hen nonvegetarians say that 'human problems come first,' I cannot help wondering what exactly it is that they are doing for human beings that compels them to continue to support the wasteful, ruthless exploitation of farm animals." Which is to say: Fine, don't spend any time at all on animal issues, but please don't pay other people to abuse animals, which is what you are doing when you buy chicken, pork or other animal products. And remember: A vegetarian diet is also the best diet for the planet, so eat as though the planet depended on it, since it just might.

Number three: "There have been many brilliant meat eaters, like Picasso and Mozart, so they could not have been wrong."

I highly doubt that anyone is going to suggest that vegetarians Steve Jobs, Leonardo da Vinci, Pythagoras, Albert Einstein, Leo Tolstoy or Mohandas Gandhi were especially brilliant because they were vegetarians, and I also don't think one can make the argument that meat eaters attained their great heights as a result of their diet. Interestingly, studies show that vegetarians are smarter than meat eaters, but there is probably not causality there -- it's probably just that thoughtful people tend to question things more deeply, hence the decision to become vegetarian. Here's a 2006 study from the British Medical Journal about vegetarians being smarter than meat eaters.

Number two: "Where do you draw the line? Should we protect insects? What's the difference between killing plants and killing animals? They're all alive."

The theologian and Narnia inventor C.S. Lewis staunchly opposed testing on animals on Christian grounds, and he pointed out to those who asked this question that the question is baseless -- they already know and understand the differences between plants and animals. To whit, every reader will recoil in horror if asked to imagine lighting a cat on fire or beating a dog's head in with a baseball bat -- because we know that these things cause the animals pain. But none of us feels similarly at the prospect of pulling weeds or mowing our lawn -- because we know that weeds and lawns have no capacity to feel pain. Chickens, pigs, fish and cattle all feel pain in the same way and to the same degree as any dog or cat. Just watch their faces and their body language in these undercover videos; listen to their animal versions of screaming. I assure you, grass does not suffer like these poor creatures do.

I'm not so sure about insects, though I try to give them the benefit of the doubt whenever possible. Yes, when I walk down the street, I'm sure I step on bugs. But does the fact that I can't stop all cruelty mean that I shouldn't bother to stop a lot of it? Of course not. That'd be like saying that if you drive a car, you shouldn't even bother to recycle.

And the No. 1 justification for eating meat is: "Meat won't kill me, and I like it."

No question -- this is the crux of it all, the only purely honest answer if you ask me. Sure enough, unless you get really bad food poisoning from your next piece of undercooked chicken or choke to death on a piece of steak, meat won't kill you right away. But chances are pretty good that eating meat could reduce your life span (and quality) in the long run. The American Dietetic Association (the overarching group of nutrition researchers, doctors, etc.) says that vegetarians have lower rates of heart disease, cancer, diabetes and obesity than do meat eaters. Some argue that for every study, there's another that says the opposite, but that's simply not so in this case. You'd be hard-pressed to find a reputable scientific or medical body that disagrees with the simple fact that vegetarians are a fraction as likely to be overweight and much less likely to suffer from heart disease and cancer. Really, even if I didn't give a hoot about animal suffering or environmental degradation, I would still be vegetarian because the diet is the best diet for my health. And as noted, eating meat does support cruelty to animals and environmental degradation, all for the sake of a palate preference (which, by the way, can be largely satisfied by the luscious faux meat options out there).

Concluding thoughts:

One thing about being a vegetarian that is often missed is how empowering it is. Personally, I think that integrity of action requires that among other things, we attempt to lead lives that are as compassionate and conscious as possible. What this means to me, personally, is that if there is something that I would not want to do myself, I don't feel good paying someone else to do it on my behalf. So I don't inflict suffering or kill animals myself; and I don't support the market of killing by buying these poor animals chopped up and shrink-wrapped in the grocery store either.

We are a nation of animal lovers, and we all cringe in horror when we hear about cases like a dog being burned alive or tossed into freeway traffic. But chickens and pigs and other animals also deserve our compassion. They are all smart animals who feel pain and fear, yet they are treated just horribly, and sadly, there are no laws to protect them. Don't take my word for it, watch Alec Baldwin's Meet Your Meat and see for yourself what goes on.

We oppose sweatshops and child labor, and we cringe at the thought of children laboring in developing countries. But American slaughterhouses are sweatshops. They employ people working illegally who can't defend themselves out of fear of being deported. Conditions in these places are so bad that the average annual turnover rate for slaughter-line workers is out of sight. Check out the website of this labor organization to learn about its fight against Smithfield Foods (the world's largest pork and turkey producer, which owns Butterball).

We are environmentalists, and we cringe when see a bright yellow Hummer in the grocery store parking lot. But regardless of the amount of fuel that a Hummer uses or the amount of greenhouse gasses that it emits, if we're eating meat, we're making a conscious decision that is even more wasteful and polluting. In addition to my recent Vegetarian is the New Prius piece, check out this E Magazine article by the magazine's editor, The Case Against Meat, or this Grist.com article, How Poultry Producers Are Ravaging the Rural South, as just a few examples.

Americans and Europeans eat meat because we want to, not because we have to. And we do it at the expense of animals, people and the environment.

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Monday, March 05, 2007

Nazis Search For The Holy Grail

Heinrich Himmler, the head of the Nazi SS, made a secret wartime mission to an abbey in Spain in search of what he believed was the Aryan Holy Grail, a new book claims. Himmler visited the famous Montserrat Abbey near Barcelona where he thought he would find the Grail which Jesus Christ was said to have used to consecrate the Last Supper.

According to The Desecrated Abbey, by Montserrat Rico Góngora, the Reichsführer-SS thought if he could lay claim to the Holy Grail it would help Germany win the war and give him supernatural powers. The book claims that, far from being the King of the Jews, Himmler shared the outlandish belief with other leading Nazis that Jesus Christ was actually descended from Aryan stock.

Góngora writes that Himmler, Hitler's right-hand man, believed Jacob was of Aryan blood and his descendants, including Jesus Christ, were Aryan too.

Góngora has interviewed a former monk who was ordered by his superiors to greet Himmler during the visit in 1940.

Now a pensioner living in an old people's home near Barcelona, Andreu Ripol Noble was at the time the only German-speaker in the abbey and was asked to help Himmler with his odd quest.

Antoni Maria Marcet, the abbot, knew Himmler had launched public attacks on the Catholic Church in Germany and had no time for him, the book claims. But Ripol related how Himmler came to Montserrat inspired by Richard Wagner's opera Parsifal, which mentions the Holy Grail could be in kept in "the marvellous castle of Montsalvat in the Pyrenees".

It was widely believed in Nazi circles that this castle was Montserrat, a belief strengthened by the fact the first performance of the opera was held at the Liceu Opera House in Barcelona in 1913. Others have said it was Montségur in France.

Wagner is thought to have been inspired by the writings of the 13th troubadour Wolfram von Eschenbach and scores of other writers who claimed to know where the sacred chalice used by Christ at the Last Supper lay.

According to Góngora, Himmler was also inspired by a folk song from Catalonia, the north-eastern region in which Montserrat lies, which has a cryptic reference to a "mystical font of life" situated in the area.

Himmler, a former chicken farmer who rose through the Nazi ranks to become Hitler's most trusted lieutenant, is known to have an interest in racial mysticism.

After initially proclaiming himself a Catholic, Himmler had started to attack the German church more publicly, and increasingly turned to a fanatical belief in racially based paganism.

But, the book claims, despite his quest to find the Grail, he came away from Montserrat empty-handed.

Himmler was in Barcelona while Hitler was holding a conference with the newly installed Spanish dictator, General Francisco Franco, in October 1940. Hitler believed he could persuade Franco to join the war on Germany's side.

But with Spain ravaged after three years of civil war, Franco refused to take sides and officially at least, remained neutral.

Hitler was said to be furious and told the Italian leader, Benito Mussolini, that Franco was a "coward". The Spanish press at the time reported Himmler's visit in bland terms, noting only that he had given 25,000 pesetas towards the repair of a local reservoir.

The Reichsführer is known to have stayed at the Ritz hotel in Barcelona and made his hour-long journey to Montserrat surrounded by "blond-haired SS men", reports at the time said.

The Desecrated Abbey by Montserrat Rico Góngora is published by Planeta in Spanish.

Copyright: Independent News

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

The Law Of Karma

In Buddhist teaching, the law of karma, says only this: `for every event that occurs, there will follow another event whose existence was caused by the first, and this second event will be pleasant or unpleasant according as its cause was skillful or unskillful.'

A skillful event is one that is not accompanied by craving, resistance or delusions; an unskillful event is one that is accompanied by any one of those things. (Events are not skillful in themselves, but are so called only in virtue of the mental events that occur with them.)

Therefore, the law of Karma teaches that responsibility for unskillful actions is born by the person who commits them.

Let's take an example of a sequence of events. An unpleasant sensation occurs. A thought arises that the source of the unpleasantness was a person. (This thought is a delusion; any decisions based upon it will therefore be unskillful.) A thought arises that some past sensations of unpleasantness issued from this same person. (This thought is a further delusion.) This is followed by a willful decision to speak words that will produce an unpleasant sensation in that which is perceived as a person. (This decision is an act of hostility. Of all the events described so far, only this is called a karma.) Words are carefully chosen in the hopes that when heard they will cause pain. The words are pronounced aloud. (This is the execution of the decision to be hostile. It may also be classed as a kind of karma, although technically it is an after-karma.) There is a visual sensation of a furrowed brow and downturned mouth. The thought arises that the other person's face is frowning. The thought arises that the other person's feelings were hurt. There is a fleeting joyful feeling of success in knowing that one has scored a damaging verbal blow. Eventually (perhaps much later) there is an unpleasant sensation of regret, perhaps taking the form of a sensation of fear that the perceived enemy may retaliate, or perhaps taking the form of remorse on having acted impetuously, like an immature child, and hping that no one will remember this childish action. (This regret or fear is the unpleasant ripening of the karma, the unskillful decision to inflict pain through words.)

If there are no persons at all, then there is no self and no other. There is no distinction between pain of which there is direct sensual awareness (which is conventionally called one's own pain) and pain that is known through inference (conventionally called another person's pain). Whether pain is known directly or indirectly, there is either an urge to quell it or an urge to cultivate it. Whether joy is known directly or indirectly, there is either an urge to nourish it or to quell it. In the conventional language of speaking of events personally, the urge to quell all pain and to nourish all joy is known as being ethical or skillful or (if you like) good. The urge to nourish pain and quell joy is known as being unskillful, unethical or bad.

Being fully ethical is said to be impossible for those who make a distinction between self and other and show preference for the perceived self over the perceived other, for such perceptions inhibit being fully responsive. Being fully ethical is possible only for those who realize that all persons are empty, that is, devoid of personhood.

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :

Jesus Lost Tomb Sparks Controversy

Archaeologists and clergymen in the Holy Land derided claims in a new documentary produced by James Cameron that contradict major Christian tenets, but the Oscar-winning director said the evidence was based on sound statistics.

"The Lost Tomb of Christ," which the Discovery Channel will run on March 4, argues that 10 ancient ossuaries — small caskets used to store bones — discovered in a suburb of Jerusalem in 1980 may have contained the bones of Jesus and his family, according to a press release issued by the Discovery Channel.

One of the caskets even bears the title, "Judah, son of Jesus," hinting that Jesus may have had a son. And the very fact that Jesus had an ossuary would contradict the Christian belief that he was resurrected and ascended to heaven.

Cameron told NBC'S TODAY show that statisticians found "in the range of a couple of million to one in favor of it being them." Simcha Jacobovici, the Toronto filmmaker who directed the documentary, said the implications "are huge."

"But they're not necessarily the implications people think they are. For example, some believers are going to say, well, this challenges the resurrection. I don't know why, if Jesus rose from one tomb, he couldn't have risen from the other tomb," Jacobovici told TODAY.

Goes against conventional wisdom

Most Christians believe Jesus' body spent three days at the site of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem's Old City. The burial site identified in Cameron's documentary is in a southern Jerusalem neighborhood nowhere near the church.

In 1996, when the British Broadcasting Corp. aired a short documentary on the same subject, archaeologists challenged the claims. Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television.

"They just want to get money for it," Kloner said.

Cameron said his critics should withhold comment until they see his film.

"I'm not a theologist. I'm not an archaeologist. I'm a documentary filmmaker," he said.

The film's claims, however, have raised the ire of Christian leaders in the Holy Land.

"The historical, religious and archaeological evidence show that the place where Christ was buried is the Church of the Resurrection," said Attallah Hana, a Greek Orthodox clergyman in Jerusalem. The documentary, he said, "contradicts the religious principles and the historic and spiritual principles that we hold tightly to."

How possible is it?

Stephen Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem who was interviewed in the documentary, said the film's hypothesis holds little weight.

"I don't think that Christians are going to buy into this," Pfann said. "But skeptics, in general, would like to see something that pokes holes into the story that so many people hold dear."

"How possible is it?" Pfann said. "On a scale of one through 10 — 10 being completely possible — it's probably a one, maybe a one and a half."

Pfann is even unsure that the name "Jesus" on the caskets was read correctly. He thinks it's more likely the name "Hanun." Ancient Semitic script is notoriously difficult to decipher.

Kloner also said the filmmakers' assertions are false.

"It was an ordinary middle-class Jerusalem burial cave," Kloner said. "The names on the caskets are the most common names found among Jews at the time."

Bone-box controversy resurrected

Archaeologists also balk at the filmmaker's claim that the James Ossuary — the center of a famous antiquities fraud in Israel — might have originated from the same cave. In 2005, Israel charged five suspects with forgery in connection with the infamous bone box.

"I don't think the James Ossuary came from the same cave," said Dan Bahat, an archaeologist at Bar-Ilan University. "If it were found there, the man who made the forgery would have taken something better. He would have taken Jesus."

None of the experts interviewed by The Associated Press had seen the whole documentary. Osnat Goaz, a spokeswoman for the Israeli government agency responsible for archaeology, declined to comment before the documentary was aired.

Copyright: MSNBC

Technorati Tags:



The Tesla Shield™

Click Here To Social Bookmark This Story

Email This Story To A Friend :


Sitemap